Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T16:48:12.190Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Regimes of Memory: the Case of the Netherlands

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2013

Pieter Emmer
Pieter Emmer*
Affiliation:
Department of History, University of Leiden, the Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Netherlands is not known for its opposing regimes of memory. There are two exceptions to this rule: the history of the German Occupation during the Second World War and the Dutch participation in the Atlantic slave trade and slavery. The relatively low numbers of survivors of the Holocaust in the Netherlands, as well as the volume and the profitability of the Dutch slave trade and slavery, and the importance of slave resistance in abolishing slavery in the Dutch Caribbean have produced conflicting views, especially between professional historians and the descendants of slaves living in the Netherlands.

Type
Focus: Regimes of Memory
Information
European Review , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , October 2013 , pp. 470 - 479
Copyright
Copyright © Academia Europaea 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Third_ManGoogle Scholar
2.Geyl, P. C. (1946) Patriotten en NSB-ers. Een historische parallel (Amsterdam: J. van Campen).Google Scholar
3.Blom, J. C. H. (1989) In de ban van goed en fout? Wetenschappelijke geschiedschrijving over de bezettingstijd in Nederland. In: J. C. H. Blom (ed.), Crisis, bezetting en herstel. Tien studies over Nederland 1930-1950 (Den Haag: Nijgh & Van Ditmar Universitair), pp. 102–120.Google Scholar
4.Schöffer, I. (1956) Het nationaal-socialistisch beeld van de geschiedenis der Nederlanden (Arnhem/Amsterdam: Van Loghum Slaterus).Google Scholar
5.Meyers, J. (1984) Mussert. Een politiek leven (Amsterdam: De Arbeiderspers), p. 120.Google Scholar
6.de Haan, I. (2008) The Paradoxes of Dutch History: Historiography of the Holocaust in the Netherlands. In: D. Bankier and D. Michman (eds), Holocaust Historiography in Context: Emergence, Challenges, Polemics and Achievements (Jerusalem: Yad Vashem), pp. 355–376.Google Scholar
7. B. van der Boom (2012) ‘We weten niets van hun lot.’ Gewone Nederlanders en de Holocaust (Amsterdam: Boom); van der Heijden, C. (2010) Grijs Verleden: Nederland en de Tweede Wereldoorlog (Amsterdam: Veen).Google Scholar
8.Kuitenbrouwer, M. (1998) Het imperialisme-debat in de Nederlandse geschiedschrijving. Bijdragen en mededelingen betreffende de geschiedenis der Nederlanden, 113, pp. 56–73.Google Scholar
9. H. W. van den Doel (2001) Afscheid van Indië. De val van het Nederlandse imperium in Azië (Amsterdam: Prometheus); de Geus, P. B. R. (1984) De Nieuw Guinea-kwestie. Aspecten van buitenlands beleid en militaire macht (Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff).Google Scholar
10.Willems, W. (2001) De uittocht uit Indië, 1945-1995 (Amsterdam: Bert Bakker).Google Scholar
11.Smeets, H. and Steijlen, F. (2006) In Nederland gebleven. De geschiedenis van de Molukkers in Nederland, 1951-2006 (Amsterdam and Utrecht: Bert Bakker and MHM).Google Scholar
12.Oostindie, G. (2009) History brought home: postcolonial migrations and the Dutch rediscovery of slavery. In: W. Klooster (ed.), Migration, Trade, and Slavery in an Expanding World. Essays in Honor of Pieter Emmer (Leiden and Boston: Brill), pp. 305–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar