Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:35:44.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Overcoming European Civil War: Patterns of Consolidation in Divided Societies, 2010–1800

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 September 2012

Iván Zoltán Dénes
Iván Zoltán Dénes
Affiliation:
Budapest, Beregszász út 62, H-1112, Hungary. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Divided, sometimes antagonistic, communities in officially unified nations seem to be the rule in Europe. In some cases, they conjure up the most painful memories of actual civil-war events, but usually they constitute the common experience of most Europeans, who lived through different kinds of war, revolutions, counter-revolutions, coups d’état, dictatorships, totalitarian systems, regime changes, territorial losses, ethnic cleansings, and exchanges of population. In spite of major breakthroughs, we find all over Europe that the experiences and humiliations of previous generations have remained mainly unspoken and unelaborated at both individual and community levels. Dangerous as they are, such narratives and undigested traumas necessarily call for well-advised, learned and thoughtful acts of overwriting and reworking. A broadly based, well-founded, historical, multi- and interdisciplinary research project for the comparison of the various modes of trauma management in the different countries and regions of Europe can open up new perspectives and provide essential tools for working out individual and collective traumatic historical experiences. Its main question is how different communities were able to process their collective traumatic historical experiences, and what can be learned from the outcomes of these processes. The project will compare the common and different characteristics of the various regimes of memory and patterns of consolidation.

Type
Focus: European Civil Wars
Information
European Review , Volume 20 , Issue 4 , 04 September 2012 , pp. 455 - 474
Copyright
Copyright © Academia Europaea 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References and Notes

1. P. Nora (Ed.) (1984–1995) Les Lieux de mémoire (Paris: Gallimard).Google Scholar
2. P. Smith, K. Koufa and A. Suppan (Eds) (1991) Ethnic Groups in International Relations (New York: New York University Press).Google Scholar
3. M. Mazower (2005) Salonica, City of Ghosts: Christians, Muslims, and Jews, 1430–1950 (New York: Alfred A. Kopf).Google Scholar
4. M. Mazower (1999) Dark Continent: Europe's Twentieth Century (New York: Alfred A. Kopf).Google Scholar
5. T. Judt (2005) Postwar: A History of Europe since 1945 (New York: The Penguin Press).Google Scholar
6. T. Judt (2008) Reappraisals: Reflections on the Forgotten Twentieth Century (New York: The Penguin Press).Google Scholar
7. W. Schivelbusch (2003) The Culture of Defeat: On National Trauma, Mourning and Recovery. Translated by J. Chase (New York: Picador, Metropolitan Books, Henry Holt & Co).Google Scholar
8. H. Boedecker (Ed.) (2002) Begriffsgeschichte—Diskursgeschichte—Metapherngeschichte (Göttingen: Wallstein Verlag).Google Scholar
9. D. Castiglione and I. Hampsher-Monk (Eds) (2001) The History of Political Thought in National Context (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. C. Conrad and S. Conrad (2002) Die Nation Schreiben. Geschichtswissenschaft im internationalen Vergleich (Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht).Google Scholar
11. C. Dutt (Ed.) (2003) Herausforderungen der Begriffsgeschichte (Heidelberg: C. Winter Universitätsverlag).Google Scholar
12. F. Dosse (2003) La marche des idées: Histoire des intellectuels—Histoire intellectuelle (Paris: La Découverte).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. M. Foucault (1972) The Archaeology of Knowledge (New York: Pantheon Books).Google Scholar
14. M. Foucault (1981) M Power/Knowledge (Hassocks, Sussex: Harvester Press).Google Scholar
15. M. Freeden (1996) Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach (Oxford: Clarendon Press).Google Scholar
16. M. Freeden (2005) Liberal Languages: Ideological Imaginations and 20th Century Thought (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
17. H.U. Gumbrecht (2006) Dimension und Grenzen der Begriffsgeschichte (München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag).Google Scholar
18. I. Hampsher-Monk et al. (Eds) (1998) History of Concepts: Comparative Perspectives (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. F. Hartog (2003) Des régimes d'historicité: Présentisme et experiénces du temps (Paris: Le Seuil).Google Scholar
20. R. Koselleck (2002) The Practice of Conceptual History: Timing History, Spacing Concepts (Stanford: Stanford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. R. Koselleck (2006) Begriffsgeschichten: Studien zur Semantik und Pragmatik der politischen und sozialen Sprache (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag).Google Scholar
22. D. LaCapra (1983) Rethinking Intellectual History: Texts, Contexts, Language (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
23. D. LaCapra (1985) History and Criticism (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).Google Scholar
24. W. Lepenies (Ed.) (2003) Entangled Histories and Negotiated Universals (Frankfurt, New York: Campus).Google Scholar
25. M. Llanque (2008) Politische Ideengeschichte—Ein Gewebe politischer Diskurse (München: Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. J.G.A. Pocock (1989) Political Language & Time. Essays on Political Thought and History (Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
27. J.G.A. Pocock (2009) Political Thought and History: Essays on Theory and Method (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
28. Q. Skinner (2002) Visions of Politics. Vol. 1. Regarding Method (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
29. G. Spiegel (1999) The Past as Text. The Theory and Practice of Medieval Historiography (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press).Google Scholar
30. L. Schorn-Schütte (2006) Historische Politikforschung. Eine Einführung (München: C.H. Beck Verlag).Google Scholar
31. J. Tully (Ed.) (1988) Meaning and Context: Quentin Skinner and His Critics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
32. K.M. Wilson (Ed.) (1996) Forging the Collective Memory. Government and International Historians through Two World Wars (Providence, RI; Oxford: Berghahn Books).Google Scholar
33. M. Werner and B. Zimmermann (Eds) (2004) De la comparaison à l'histoire croisée (Paris: Le Seuil).Google Scholar
34. See the studies on nationalism by E. Gellner, A.D. Smith and J. Breuilly.Google Scholar
35.See the interpretations of the different discourses of collective identities in L. Colley (1992) Britons: Forging the Nation, 1707–1837 (New Haven; London: Yale University Press).Google Scholar
36. P. Rosanvallon (2004) Le Modèle Politique Français: La société civile contre le jacobinisme de 1789 à nos jours (Paris: Éditions du Seuil).Google Scholar
37. B. Trencsényi, M. Kopeček, et al. (Eds) (2006, 2007, 2010) Discourses of Collective Identity in Central and Southeast Europe (1770–1945), Texts and Commentaries (Budapest; New York: Central European Press).Google Scholar
38. J. Hayward (2007) Fragmented France: Two Centuries of Disputed Identity (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39. F. Bechhofer and D. McCrone (Eds) (2009) National Identity, Nationalism and Constitutional Change (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40. P. Nora (1984–1995) Les Lieux de mémoire (Paris: Gallimard).Google Scholar
41.István Bibó's pathbreaking interpretations: I. Bibó (1991) Die deutsche Hysterie: Ursachen und Geschichte. Translated by H.H. Paetzke (Frankfurt am Main; Leipzig: Insel Verlag); I. Bibó (1993) Misére des petits États d'Europe de l'Est. Translated by Gy. Kassai (Paris: Albin Michel); and I. Bibó (1997) Isteria tedesca, paura francese, insicurezza italiana. Psicologia di tre nazioni da Napoleone a Hitler. Translated by M. Mihályi (Bologna: Il Mulino), were written in 1942–1944, but published more than four decades later. These works of Bibó were among the first steps towards the direction advocated by this project. Many of Bibó's conclusions harmonised with several later studies on Germany, such as W. Mommsen (1978) Der deutsche Liberalismus zwischen ‘Klassenloser Bürgengesellschaft’ und ‘Organisiertem Kapitalismus’. Zu einigen neuerern Liberalismusinterpretatione. Geschichte und Gesellschaft, 1; T. Nipperdey (1983) Deutsche Geschichte 1800–1866. Bürgerwelt und starker Staat (München: Thomas Beck, C.H.); L. Gall (1990) Bismarck, the White Revolutionary (London: Unwin Hyman); J.J. Sheehan (1993) German History, 1770–1866 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press); J.J. Sheehan (1999) German Liberalism in the Nineteenth Century (New York: Humanity Books); D. Langewiesche (2000) Liberalism in Germany (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
42. W. Schivelbusch (2003) The Culture of Defeat: On National Trauma, Mourning and Recovery (New York: Picador, Metropolitan Books, Henry Holt & Co), was a breakthrough connecting the literature on traumas with the historical literature.Google Scholar
43. For the brief overviews of the cases I worked out some common theoretical and methodological points, then was privileged enough to learn from the following colleagues’ individual proposals: John A. Davis (University of Connecticut) on Italy, Jürgen Elvert (University of Cologne) on Germany, Maarten Van Ginderachter (University of Antwerp) on Belgium, Maciej Janowski (Institute of History, Warsaw) on Poland, Jeremy Jennings (University of London) on France, Leonidas Kallivretakis (Neo-Hellenic Research Foundation, Athens) on Greece, Michal Kopeček (Institute of Contemporary History, Prague) on Bohemia, Czechoslovakia, Czech Republic and Slovakia, Mikko Lagerspetz (Åbo Akademi University) on Estonia, Pablo Sánchez Léon (Universidad del País Vasco) on Spain and the regime of memory, Dubravko Lovrenovic (University of Sarajevo) on Bosnia-Herzegovina, Nils Muiznieks (University of Latvia) on Latvia, Piotr Wciślik (Central European University, Budapest-Warsaw) on Poland, Árpád Welker (City Archive, Budapest-University of Helsinki) on Finland and Meike Wulf (University of Maastricht) on Estonia. I am indebted to them. I do hope we shall have the chance working out together each and all cases and their comparisons as well.Google Scholar