Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T02:21:59.246Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On looking both ways at once: scrutinies of the private life of higher education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2009

Guy Neave
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Can governments trust the universities to be ‘market responsive’? What changes in the relationship between government and higher education are emerging in Europe? In what way do they differ from the assumptions which until recently underpinned similar policy in Britain? Different political values lead to different arrangements. This article examines some of the contemporary issues posed by strengthening of mechanisms of accountability and the implications their reinforcement has for participation in institutional decision making. © 1997 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Type
Research Article
Information
European Review , Volume 5 , Issue 3 , July 1997 , pp. 289 - 303
Copyright
Copyright © Academia Europaea 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Templeman, G. (1982) Britain: a model at risk. CRE Information, No. 58, 2nd Quarter, pp. 22–30.Google Scholar
2.Clark, B. R. (1983) The Higher Education System: Academic Organisation in Cross National Perspective, Berkeley, Los Angeles, London, University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Teichler, U. (1997) Graduate unemployment—challenges for higher education in the 21st century.Paper presented to the Unesco Consultation of Non Governmental Organisations,Paris,February [mimeo] 13pp.Google Scholar
4.Consejo de Universidades (1987) La Reforma universitaria española: evaluaciòn e informe, Madrid, Consejo de Universidades Secretaria General.Google Scholar
5.Clark, B. R. (1977) Academic Power in Italy: Bureaucracy and Oligarchy in a National University System, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
6.Neave, G. and Jenkinson, Sally (1983) Higher Education Research in Sweden: an Analysis and an Evaluation, Stockholm, Almqvist & Wiksell International, 106pp.Google Scholar
7.Neave, G. (1996) Homogenization, Integration and Convergence: the Cheshire Cats of Higher Education analysis. In The Mockers and Mocked: Comparative Perspectives on Differentiation, Convergence and Diversity in Higher Education. Meek, V. L., Goedegebuure, L., Kivinen, O. and Rinne, R. (Eds). Paris/Oxford, Pergamon for IAU Press.Google Scholar
8.Neave, G. (1995) The core functions of government: six European perspectives on a shifting educational landscape. Report to the Adviesraad voor het Onderwijs (Dutch Advisory Council on Eduation), Utrecht, Netherlands, April 1995, pp. 45.Google Scholar
9.de Groof, J. (1995) The Scope and distinction between Article 126 and 127 of the Treaty on European Union and the implications of the principle of subsidiarity.Paper presented to the International Educational Law Association,Bremen,December 1995 (mimeo).Google Scholar
10.Haberma[es], J. (1973) The Legitimation Crisis, London.Google Scholar
11.Weiler, H. (1983) Compensatory legitimation. Comparative Education Review.Google Scholar
12.Fragnière, G. and Busman, C. (1976) L'Université technique de Twente. Paedagogic Europaea xi(2), 69–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Trow, M. (1990) American higher education: exceptional or just different? In Schafer, Still Different? A New Look at American Exceptionalism, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
14.Lane, J.-E. and Fredriksson, B. (1981) Higher Education and Public Administration. Stockholm, Almqvist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
15.Groof, J. de, Neave, G. and Svec, J. (forthcoming) Governance and Democracy in Higher Education, Strasbourg, Council of Europe Legislative Reform Project Volume 2.Google Scholar
16.Neave, G. and Rhoades, G. (1987) The academic estate in Western Europe. In The Academic Profession: National, Disciplinary and Institutional Settings. Clark, B. R. (Ed.). Berkeley, Los Angeles, University of California Press, 59pp.Google Scholar
17.Fluxá, J.-M. (1996) Identificación de problemas de los Organos de Gobierno de la Universidad. Seminario de reflexión sobre órganos de gobierno de la universidad, Cuidad Réal (Spain) Consejo de Universidades, [mimeo] 15pp.Google Scholar
18.CRE (1986–1987) European University Systems part i. CRE Bulletin No. 75(Standing Conference of Presidents, Rectors and Vice-Chancellors of the European Universities) 3rd Quarter 1986, Geneva, Conférence des Recteurs Européens, 140pp. CRE European University Systems part ii. CRE Bulletin No. 77, 1st Quarter 1987, Geneva, Conférence des Recteurs Européens, 136pp.Google Scholar
19.Vallès, J. M. (1996) Gobeirno universitario: entre la autogestión estamental y la responsibilidad social. Seminario de reflexión sobre órganos de gobierno de la universidad, Cuidad Réal (Spain) (Consejo de Universidades), [mimeo] 16pp.Google Scholar
20.Trow, M. (1978) The ‘public’ and ‘private’ lives of academia. Minerva 2, 113–127.Google Scholar
21.Harmon, G. (1992) Governance, administration and finance. In The Encyclopedia of Higher Education. Clark, B. R. and Neaves, G. (Eds) (4 vols). Oxford, Pergamon, Vol. 2. Analytical Perspectives, pp. 1279ff.Google Scholar
22.Neave, G. and Vught, F. van (1992) Prometheus Bound: the Changing Relationship Between Government and Higher Education in Western Europe, Oxford, Pergamon Press, 253pp.Google Scholar
23.Neave, G. and Vught, F. van (1994) Government and Higher Education Relationships across Three Continents: the Winds of Change, Oxford, Elsevier-Pergamon, 319pp.Google Scholar
24.Burgess, T. and Pratt, J. (1974) The Polytechnics: a report. London, Pitmans.Google Scholar