Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:05:24.970Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Moral and Legal Dilemmas of the New Polish Security Policy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2019

Marek Górka
Marek Górka*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Humanities, Koszalin University of Technology, Kwiatkowskiego 6e, 75-343 Koszalin, Poland. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Due to attacks carried out by terrorist organisations, most European countries have placed this phenomenon at the forefront of their priorities in the field of security policy. The fight against terrorism has sparked a heated debate about the significance of security and civil liberties. The law on anti-terrorist operations of 2 July 2016 triggered the debate in Poland as well. This article attempts to answer the question of whether it is possible to maintain a balance between freedom and security. Therefore, the contemporary challenge that many governments face is not effective terrorist attack prevention, but rather an effective anti-terrorism policy whose provisions will not pose a greater threat to democracy than terrorists themselves.

Type
Articles
Information
European Review , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , May 2019 , pp. 260 - 274
Copyright
© Academia Europaea 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes and References

1. Kostakopoulou, D. (2009) The area of freedom, security and justice and the political morality of migration and integration. In: H. Lindahl (Ed.), A Right to Inclusion and Exclusion? Normative Fault Lines of the EU’s Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (Oxford: Hart Highlights), pp. 185–208; A. Etzioni (2005) How Patriotic is the Patriot Act? Freedom Versus Security in the Age of Terrorism (New York, London: Routledge), pp. 9–27; Ch. Eckes (2011) The legal framework of the European Union’s counter-terrorist policies. Full of good intentions? In: Ch. Eckes and T. Konstadinides (Eds), Crime within the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 127–158; J. Angwin (2014) Dragnet Nation: A Quest for Privacy, Security, and Freedom in a World of Relentless Surveillance (New York: Macmillan), pp. 37–44.Google Scholar
2. The Law of June 10, 2016 on anti-terrorist operations in Poland. Available at: http://isap.sejm.gov.pl/DetailsServlet?id=WDU20160000904 (accessed 10 October 2016).Google Scholar
3. Matlary, J.H. (2009) European Union Security Dynamics In the New National Interest (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 15–39; S. Léonard and Ch. Kaunert (2013) Introduction – beyond EU counter-terrorism cooperation: European security, terrorism and intelligence. In: S. Léonard and Ch. Kaunert (Eds), European Security, Terrorism and Intelligence Tackling New Security Challenges in Europe (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
4. Ivancea, T.I. and Baltes, L. (2011) European security and defence dimension, general aspects. Land Forces Academy Review, 16(2), pp. 156–159; N. Nita and M.C. Bogea (2013) The most important challenges of Romania for the sustainable development of the freedom, security and justice space in the European Union. Acta Universitatis George Bacovia, 2(2), pp. 24–36; M. Kornprobst (2015) Building agreements upon agreements: The European Union and grand strategy. European Journal of International Relations, 21(2), p. 267; M. Kornprobst (2013) European Union strategy for cyber security. Military Technology, 37(3), p. 58.Google Scholar
5. Z. Minton Beddoes (2016) Brexit brief: Immigration. Let them not come. The Economist. Available at: http://www.economist.com/news/britain/21695958-hostility-large-scale-european-union-migration-could-decide-referendum-let-them-not-come (accessed 10 October 2016); Z. Minton Beddoes (2015) Islam in Europe. The Economist. Available at: http://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2015/01/daily-chart-2 (accessed 10 October 2016).Google Scholar
6. The European Union increasingly assumes the role of an international entity, whose role extends beyond the geographical reach of member countries. This is, first, due to the same kind of undertaken missions; second, it is due to the neighbourhood policy and assistance for the development. Rouet, G. (2014) Turbulences, European neighbourhood policy and European identity. Politické Vedy, 2, pp. 9–27.Google Scholar
7. Górka, M. (2016) Freedom or security? Contribution to the discussion on the example of the law on anti-terrorist operations on 10 June 2016. e-Politikon, 19, available at: http://oapuw.pl/e-politikon (accessed 10 October 2016).Google Scholar
8. Ciorciari, J.D. and Ch. Weiss, J (2016) Nationalist protests, government responses, and the risk of escalation in interstate disputes. Security Studies, 25(3), pp. 546–583.10.1080/09636412.2016.1195633Google Scholar
9. Olsen, G.R. (2015) After Afghanistan: The European Union as security provider in Africa. Global Society, 29(2), pp. 227–242.10.1080/13600826.2015.1013922Google Scholar
10. Banks, Ch.P. and Tauber, S. (2014) U.S. District Court decision-making in USA PATRIOT Act cases after September 11. Justice System Journal, 35(2), pp. 139–161; B.E. Gronbeck (2014) The USA Patriot Act: Coming to terms with silenced voices. Journal of the European Institute for Communication and Culture, 11(2), pp. 37–48.Google Scholar
11. Byman, D. (2016) The Islamic State’s European front. International New York Times, 24 March 2016, p. 8.Google Scholar
12. The Law of June 10, 2016 on anti-terrorist operations in Poland, Article 4§1,2. Available at: http://isap.sejm.gov.pl/DetailsServlet?id=WDU20160000904 (accessed 10 October 2016).Google Scholar
13. Carter, J.G. and Carter, D.L. (2012) Law enforcement intelligence: implications for self-radicalized terrorism. Police Practice and Research, 13(2), pp. 138–154.Google Scholar
14. Zegart, A.B. (2006) An empirical analysis of failed intelligence reforms before September 11. Political Science Quarterly, 121(1), pp. 33–60; S. Marrin (2011) The 9/11 terrorist attacks: A failure of policy not strategic intelligence analysis. Intelligence and National Security, 26(2-3), pp. 182–202.Google Scholar
15. The Law of June 10, 2016 on anti-terrorist operations in Poland, Article 3§1, 5§1, 8§1. Available at: http://isap.sejm.gov.pl/DetailsServlet?id=WDU20160000904 (accessed 10 October 2016).Google Scholar
16. Donohue, L.K. (2005) Security and freedom on the fulcrum. Terrorism and Political Violence, 17(1-2), pp. 69–87.10.1080/09546550590520582Google Scholar
17. Regulation of the Minister of Internal Affairs and Administration dated 22 July 2016. On the catalog of incidents of terrorist. Available at: http://isap.sejm.gov.pl/DetailsServlet?id=WDU20160001092 (accessed 10 October 2016).Google Scholar
18. The Law of June 10, 2016 on anti-terrorist operations in Poland, Article 9§1. Available at: http://isap.sejm.gov.pl/DetailsServlet?id=WDU20160000904 (accessed 10 October 2016).Google Scholar
19. The Law of June 10, 2016 on anti-terrorist operations in Poland, Article 10§1. Available at: http://isap.sejm.gov.pl/DetailsServlet?id=WDU20160000904 (accessed 10 October 2016).Google Scholar
20. The Criminal Code. Article 115§20. Available at: http://isap.sejm.gov.pl/DetailsServlet?id=WDU19970880553 (accessed 10 October 2016).Google Scholar
21. The Law of June 10, 2016 on anti-terrorist operations in Poland, Article 23§1,4,5,6. Available at: http://isap.sejm.gov.pl/DetailsServlet?id=WDU20160000904 (accessed 10 October 2016).Google Scholar
22. The Law of June 10, 2016 on anti-terrorist operations in Poland, Article 22§1,2. Available at: http://isap.sejm.gov.pl/DetailsServlet?id=WDU20160000904 (accessed 10 October 2016).Google Scholar