Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:52:53.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Mirage of Global Democracy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Jaap De Wilde
Jaap De Wilde*
Affiliation:
Department of International Relations & International Organization, University of Groningen, The Netherlands. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The literature about global democracy deals with two different types of democratization: Type 1 is about spreading democracy across sovereign states as the basis for good governance. It focuses on the quality of the state/society-nexus: the balance between coercion, reward and identity. Type 2 is about democratizing world politics as such. In its most concrete expressions it focuses on the relationship between international society (a community of states) and world society (a community of people). The contemporary structure of multilevel governance provides the rationale behind this: national democracies are ineffective in controlling essential centres of power. This implies a need to scale up democracy to global proportions. However, in Type 1 considerations the term democracy often is an empty shell. This blinds observers for checks and balances and types of pluralism in non-democratic states. It also blinds them for misuse of democratic claims in democratic states. Aspiring global democracy in terms of Type 2 ignores that the presence of a central authority is a precondition inherent to the concept of democracy. Democratic theory cannot escape and is consequently caught up in its preconditions of a people (demos) and a government (cratos).

Type
Focus: Globalization
Information
European Review , Volume 19 , Issue 1 , February 2011 , pp. 5 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © Academia Europaea 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Tilly, C. (1990) Coercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990-1990 (Oxford/Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell) C. Tilly (1994) War making and state making as organized crime. In: J. A. Hall (ed.) The State: Critical Concepts (London: Routledge), pp. 508–529.Google Scholar
2.Anderson, B. (1991) Imagined Communities. Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, (London: Verso).Google Scholar
3. See, for example Bayart, J.-F., Ellis, S. and Hibou, B. (1999) The Criminalization of the State in Africa (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).Google Scholar
4.www.freedomhouse.org.Google Scholar
5. ANP, de Volkskrant, 2 January 2010.Google Scholar
6.www.worldaudit.org; here Mexico is listed 62.Google Scholar
7.Guéhenno, J. M. (1994) La fin de la Démocratie (Paris: Editions Flammarion).Google Scholar
8. See, for example, Chomsky, N. (2006) Failed States: The Abuse of Power and the Assault on Democracy (New York: Metropolitan Books) Ch. 6 (analysing the 2004 presidential elections).Google Scholar
9.Holm, T. T. and Eide, E. B. (eds) (2000) Peacebuilding and Police Reform (London: Frank Cass).Google Scholar
10.Huinder, C. (ed.) (1991) De macht van de kazerne: militairen in Afrika, Latijns Amerika en Azië (The Power of the Barracks: The Military in Africa, Latin America and Asia) (Kleine XminY Studies).Google Scholar
11.Weiler, J. H. H. (1999) The Constitution of Europe: ‘Do the New Clothes have an Emperor?’ and Other Essays on European Integration (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) Ch. 8; J. S. Nye Jr. (2001) Globalization’s democratic deficit, Foreign Affairs, 80(4).Google Scholar
12.Czempiel, E. O. and Rosenau, J. N. (eds) (1992) Governance Without Government: Order and Change in World Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). R. Higgott, G. Underhill and A. Bieler (eds) (2000) Non-State Actors and Authority in the Global System (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
13.Dahl, R. A. (1998) On Democracy (New Haven: Yale University Press), p. 38.Google Scholar
14.Omelicheva, M. Y. (2009) Global civil society and democratization of world politics: a bona fine relationship or illusory liaison? International Studies Review, 11, p. 109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Omelicheva, M. Y. (2009) Global civil society and democratization of world politics: a bona fine relationship or illusory liaison? International Studies Review, 11, p. 116, emphasis added.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Jackson, R. H. (2000) The Global Covenant: Human Conduct in a World of States (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 341–342.Google Scholar
17.Buzan, B. (2004) From International to World Society? English School Theory and the Social Structure of Globalization (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
18.Werner, W. G. and de Wilde, J. H. (2001) The endurance of sovereignty. The European Journal for International Relations, 7(3), pp. 283–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Linklater, A. and Suganami, H. (2006) The English School of International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Ellis, D. C. (2009) On the possibility of ‘International Community’. International Studies Review, 11, p. 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Weiler, J. H. H. (1999) The Constitution of Europe: ‘Do the New Clothes have an Emperor?’ and Other Essays on European Integration (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), p. 268.Google Scholar
22.Weiler, J. H. H. (1999) The Constitution of Europe: ‘Do the New Clothes have an Emperor?’ and Other Essays on European Integration (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), p. 270.Google Scholar
23.http://www.bicc.de.Google Scholar
24.Omelicheva, M. Y. (2009) Global civil society and democratization of world politics: a bona fine relationship or illusory liaison? International Studies Review, 11, p. 126, emphasis added.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Weiss, T. G. (2009) What happened to the idea of world government. International Studies Quarterly, 53, p. 254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Weiss, T. G. (2009) What happened to the idea of world government. International Studies Quarterly, 53, p. 267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar