Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T16:29:03.652Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Is the ‘Intention’ There? On the Impact of Scientism on Hermeneutics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2018

Zhang Jiang*
Affiliation:
Chinese Academy of Social Science, Beijing 100732, People’s Republic of China. Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Ever since the mid-twentieth century, there has been a prevailing tendency of eliminating the author’s existence in his or her text, as well as the existence of his or her intention. The practice of negating the meaning of the author’s intention and thereby imposing arbitrary interpretations on the text to serve the critic’s own interpretive purpose, has led contemporary literary hermeneutics onto the wrong road of relativism and nihilism. It is sensible for us to identify an impact of scientism on such a hermeneutic tendency. However, no matter how we try to deny and dissolve the author’s intention, its being in the text is a hard fact that always determines the text’s quality and value and influences the readers’ understanding and interpretation. The author’s intention runs through the whole process of the text’s creation, displaying itself in all the plans and designs of the text, such as its language, structure and style. It is a false question to ask whether intention exists in literary creation, and the idea that the other person can be totally independent of the author’s intention to assert the meanings or significance of the text will finally lead us to nowhere but sheer subjective imagination. Any serious and responsible critic must research in depth to first bring out the author’s intention, and then bring out the text’s historical and social milieus. This is the foundational step towards fair and justified interpretation of the text. Since literary works are the objectification of the authors’ thoughts and mind power, we, whatever theories we are interested in, should give the author and his or her intention due respect. This is undoubtedly a scientific attitude toward literary studies.

Type
Conflicts and Dialogues between Science and Humanities
Copyright
© Academia Europaea 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References and Notes

1. Wimsatt, W.K. and Beardsley, M.C. (1989) The intentional fallacy. In: W.K. Wimsatt Jr. (Ed.), The Verbal Icon: Studies in the Meaning of Poetry (Lexington, KY: The University Press of Kentucky), pp. 318.Google Scholar
2. Here, one could particularly refer to R. Wellek (1986) A History of Modern Criticism 1750-1950. Volume 6: American Criticism, 1900-1950 (New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
3. Bell, C. (1913) Art (New York: Frederick A. Stokes Company), p. 8.Google Scholar
4. Barthes, R. (1977) Image Music Text: Essays Selected and Translated by Stephen Heath (London: Fontana Press), p. 111.Google Scholar
5. Barthes, R. (1970) Writing Degree Zero. Translated by A. Lavers and C. Smith (Boston: Beacon Paperback), p. 17.Google Scholar
6. Husserl, E. (2001) Logical Investigations, Vol. 1. Translated by J.N. Findlay (New York: Routledge), p. 191.Google Scholar
7. Barthes, R. (2002) S/Z, Translated by R. Miller (New York: Blackwell), p. 22.Google Scholar