Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T08:07:16.716Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interpreting Regimes of Memory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 November 2013

Iván Zoltán Dénes*
Affiliation:
Budapest, Beregszász út 62, H-1112, Hungary. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

This introduction gives a brief account of the conceptual framework and the topics of the case studies, especially the connection between the psychological concept of trauma applied in the social sciences and the characteristics of the historical analysis of traumatic events or processes, the link between the patterns of consolidation and the regimes of memory, and the context of the chosen case studies of this focus.

Type
Focus: Regimes of Memory
Copyright
Copyright © Academia Europaea 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes and References

1. Pablo Sánchez León (Universidad del Pais Vasco) inspired me on the subject of Regimes of Memory as a whole and as regards details between 2009 and 2011 working on the proposal of European Civil Wars: Patterns of Consolidation in Divided Societies, 2010-1800. I am grateful for his ideas. His bibliographical list includes: Brown, D. P., Scheflin, A. W. and Hammond, D. C. (2002) Memory, Trauma Treatment, and the Law (New York: W.W. Norton)Google Scholar
Felman, S. (2002) The Juridical Unconscious: Trials and Traumas in the Twentieth Century (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press)Google Scholar
Sarat, A., Davidovitch, N. and Albertstein, M. (2007) Trauma and Memory: Reading, Healing, and Making Law (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press)Google Scholar
Campbell, K. (2011) Testifying to Trauma: The Codification of Trauma in Humanitarian Law. (2011)Google Scholar
Breakwell, G. M., Coping with Threatened Identities (London: Methuen)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erickson, K. (1994) A New Species of Trouble: Explorations in Disaster, Trauma, and Community (New York: W.W. Norton)Google Scholar
Young, J. A. (1995) The Harmony of Illusions: Inventing Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press)Google Scholar
Caruth, C. (1996) Unclaimed Experience: Trauma, Narrative, Memory (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press)Google Scholar
Kolk, B. A., McFarlane, A. C. and Weisaeth, L. (1996) Traumatic Stress: The Effects of Overwhelming Experience on Mind, Body, and Society (New York: Guilford Press)Google Scholar
Danieli, Y. (1998) International Handbook of Multigenerational Legacies of Trauma (New York: Kluwer Academic)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaCapra, D. (2000) History and Memory after Auschwitz (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press)Google Scholar
Leys, R. (2000) Trauma: A Genealogy (Chicago: University of Chicago Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, S. J. (2003) Trauma and Recovery (New York: Basic Books)Google Scholar
Alexander, J., Eyerman, R., Giesen, B., Smelser, N. and Stompka, P. (2004) Cultural Trauma and Collective Memory (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press)Google Scholar
Wilson, P. (2005) The Posttraumatic Self: Restoring Meaning and Wholeness to Personality (New York: Routledge)Google Scholar
Kirmayer, L. J., Lemelson, R. and Barad, M. (eds) (2007) Understanding Trauma. Integrating Biological, Clinical and Cultural Perspectives (New York: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Iván Zoltán Dénes (2012) European Review, 20(4), pp. 455–525.Google Scholar
3. István Bibó (b. 1911, d. 1979), political thinker. See: Document. Cf. Berki, R. N. (1992) The realism of moralism. The political philosophy of István Bibó. History of Political Thought, XIII, 3Google Scholar
Dénes, I. Z. (ed) (2014) The Meaning of European Political Development. The Essays of István Bibó (New Haven, CT; London: Yale University Press)Google Scholar