Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T15:45:19.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Individual Sanctions of Competition Law: A Comparison between the UK and Turkey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 November 2019

Samet Caliskan  and
Saliha Oner
Samet Caliskan
Affiliation:
Mus Alparslan University, Turkey. Email: [email protected]
Saliha Oner
Affiliation:
S&S Business and Legal Consultancy, Newcastle, UK. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is a highly advocated view that a competition law with sanctions targeting individuals would achieve a greater deterrent impact than one that does not. Having introduced individual sanctions does not, however, guarantee that a market would have less anticompetitive conduct, because these sanctions are effective only insofar as they are severely implemented on wrongdoing individuals. UK competition law is one example of this issue because cases where individuals have been targeted and punished are significantly fewer than the authorities expected, in spite of it being more than 15 years since individual sanctions were introduced amidst high expectations. This article examines the individual sanctions of competition law in the UK and Turkey. It argues that Turkey is on the right path by departing from the way in which EU law enforces the rules of competition law, and is moving closer to UK law. However, it is argued that further steps should be cautiously considered to avoid the same issues which UK competition law is currently experiencing, as there are serious doubts that the latter has achieved the desired deterrent effect.

Type
Articles
Information
European Review , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , February 2020 , pp. 154 - 171
Copyright
© Academia Europaea 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bodrum Feribot İşletmeciliği A.Ş. and Bodrum Express Denizcilik ve Turizm A.Ş. (Case 09-51/1245-314) TCA decision of 3 November 2009.Google Scholar
Booking.com (Case 17-01/12-4) TCA decision of 5 January 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caliskan, S (2019) Company liability and competition law: exposure of company to risk of undesirable behaviour of directors. Liverpool Law Review. Available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10991-019-09220-4 (accessed 17 February 2019).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canbolat, EC and Lahur, S (2017) Turkish Competition Authority’s fining natural persons. Available at http://www.mondaq.com/turkey/x/629150/Antitrust+Competition/Turkish+Competition+Authoritys+Fining+Natural+Persons (accessed 9 January 2019).Google Scholar
Cargo (Case 10-58/1193-449) TCA decision of 3 September 2010.Google Scholar
Citröen Dealers (Case 10-60/1274-480) TCA decision of 23 September 2010.Google Scholar
Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) (2015) Competition and Markets Authority Annual Plan 2015/16 (CMA34).Google Scholar
Competition Policy International (CPI) (2019) Turkey: Gov investigates Google over competition law violations. Available at https://www.competitionpolicyinternational.com/turkey-gov-investigates-google-over-competition-law-violations/ (accessed 4 January 2019).Google Scholar
De Moncuit, G (2018) Legitimacy test for criminal sanction: antitrust law perspective. Global Competition Litigation Review 11(4), 152–158.Google Scholar
Department for Business, Innovation, & Skills (BIS) (2011) A Competition Regime for Growth: A Consultation on Options for Reform. London: BIS. Available at https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/31411/11-657-competition-regime-for-growth-consultation.pdf (accessed 13 March 2019).Google Scholar
Furse, M (2012) The Criminal Law of Competition in the UK and in the US – Failure and Success. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Galloway, J (2017) Securing the legitimacy of individual sanctions in UK competition law. World Competition: Law and Economics Review 40(1), 121–157.Google Scholar
Google (Case 18-33/555-273) TCA decision of 19 September 2018.Google Scholar
Gündüz, H (2012) Fines in Turkish competition law: has the lottery ended? Competition Journal 13(4), 45–96.Google Scholar
Hammond, SD (2004) Cornerstones of an Effective Leniency Program. Available at https://www.justice.gov/atr/speech/cornerstones-effective-leniency-program (accessed 12 February 2019).Google Scholar
Hicks, A (2001) Director disqualification: can it deliver? Journal of Business Law, 433–460.Google Scholar
Izmir Chamber of Jewellers (Case 16-35/603-268) TCA decision of 27 October 2016.Google Scholar
Jashua, J (2010) Shooting the messenger: does the UK criminal cartel offense have a future? Available at http://www.americanbar.org/content/dam/aba/publishing/antitrust_source/Aug10_Joshua8_2f.authcheckdam.pdf (accessed 19 February 2019).Google Scholar
Jones, A and Williams, R (2014) The UK response to the global effort against cartels: is criminalization really the solution? Journal of Antitrust Enforcement 2(1), 100–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kovacic, WE (2016) Criminal enforcement of competition law: implications of US experience. Concurrences – Competition Law Review 2, 33–40.Google Scholar
Kriesberg, SM (1976) Decision-making models and the control of corporate crime. Yale Law Journal 85, 1091–1129.Google Scholar
Lever, J (1999) The development of British competition law: a complete overhaul and harmonization. Available at https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/51159/1/301152780.pdf (accessed 17 March 2019).Google Scholar
Office of Fair Trading (2001) The proposed criminalisation of cartels in the UK (OFT365).Google Scholar
Official Gazette (Number 25781) (2008). Available at http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2008/02/20080208-1.htm (accessed 28 January 2019).Google Scholar
Otuzbir Kimya ve Sanayi Türk Ltd. Şti. (Otuzbir Ltd) and Sodaş Sodyum Sanayi A.S. (Sodas AS) (Case 12-24/711-199) TCA decision of 5 March 2012.Google Scholar
Peugeot Dealers I (Case 10-53/1057-391) TCA decision of 6 August 2010.Google Scholar
Polinsky, MA and Shavell, S (1993) Should employees be subject to fines and imprisonment given the existence of corporate liability? International Legal Review Law & Economics 239–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R. v Burns and Others [2010] EWCA Crim 1148.Google Scholar
R. v Whittle [2008] EWCA Crim 2560; [2009] U.K.C.L.R. 247.Google Scholar
Reindl, AP (2006) How strong is the case for criminal sanctions in cartel cases. In Cseres, KJ, Schinkel, MP and Vogelaar, FOW (eds), Criminalisation of Competition Law Enforcement: Economic and Legal Implications for the EU Member States. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 110–133.Google Scholar
Ruhmkorf, A and Du Plessis, JJ (2017) The United Kingdom. In Du Plessis, JJ and De Koker, JN (eds), Disqualification of Company Directors: A Comparative Analysis of the Law in the UK, Australia, South Africa, the US, and Germany. Oxford: Routledge, pp. 32–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v Goldberg [2004] 1 BCLC 597 para [611].Google Scholar
Stanton Bonna (UK) Ltd, FP McCann Ltd, CPM Group Ltd and Milton Pipes Ltd (Stanton), CE/9705/12.Google Scholar
Steel Ring Manufacturers (Case 12-52/1479-508) TCA decision of 30 October 2012.Google Scholar
Steel Tanks, CE/9623/12.Google Scholar
Stephan, A (2008) Survey of public attitudes to price-fixing and cartel enforcement in Britain. Company Law Review 5(1), 123–145.Google Scholar
Stephan, A (2011a) Disqualification orders for directors involved in cartels. Journal for European Competition Law & Practice 2(6), 529–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephan, A (2011b) How dishonesty killed the cartel offence. Criminal Law Review 6, 446–455.Google Scholar
TCA (2019) Annual Reports. Available at https://www.rekabet.gov.tr/en/Sayfa/information-center/publications/annual-reports?sayfa=1 (accessed 15 February 2019).Google Scholar
Whelan, P (2007) A principled argument for personal criminal sanctions as punishment under EC cartel law. Competition Law Review 4(1), 7–40.Google Scholar
White Meat (Case 09-57/1393-362) TCA decision of 25 November 2009.Google Scholar
Wils, WPJ (2005) Is criminalization of EU competition law the answer? World Competition: Law and Economics Review 28(2), 1–52.Google Scholar
Wils, WPJ (2008) Efficiency and Justice in European Antitrust Enforcement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar