Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T20:24:00.648Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The impact of the New Biology on our philosophical view of the world, man and the environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2009

Dagfinn Føllesdal
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The so-called New Biology has given us revolutionary insights into the nature of life and created an upsurge of popular interest in biology. However, it has also fostered an impression of ‘genetic determinism’ which been eagerly put to use in political ideology.

Type
Focus: Science and society
Information
European Review , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , May 1999 , pp. 285 - 293
Copyright
Copyright © Academia Europaea 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Kitcher, P. (1996) The Lives to Come (New York: Simon & Schuster), p. 271.Google Scholar
2.Nelkin, D. and Lindee, M. S. (1995) The DNA Mystique (New York: Freeman) pp. 2–3.Google Scholar
3.Dawkins, R. (1976) The Selfish Gene (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
4.Godfrey-Smith, P. (1999) On the theoretical role of ‘genetic coding’. To appear in Philosophy of Science.Google Scholar
5.Sulloway, F. (1998) ‘Darwinian virtues.’ New York Review of Books, 45(6), 9 04 9, pp. 34–40.Google Scholar
6.Andreasen, R. O. (1998) A new perspective on the race debate. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 49, 199–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Hull, D. L. (1994) Species, Races and Genders: Differences are Not Deviations, Genes and Human Knowledge (Iowa City, Iowa: University of Iowa Press).Google Scholar
8.Hull, D. L. (1998) Species, subspecies and races. Social Research, 65, 351–367.Google Scholar