Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:46:35.160Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

How Many Italies? Reconciliation, the Risorgimento and Italy's North South Divide

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 September 2012

John A. Davis
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut, USA. Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Italy is a critical point of reference for studying the strengths and limits of strategies of reconciliation in divided European societies, one that demonstrates the validity of Iván Zoltán Dénes’ introductory comment that the presence of ‘divided, sometimes antagonistic, communities in officially unified nations seems to be the rule in Europe’.

Type
Focus: European Civil Wars
Copyright
Copyright © Academia Europaea 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References and Notes

1. See Tobias, B. (1991) Una patria per gli italiani: spazi, itinerari, monumenti nell'Italia unita (Bari: Laterza) and M. Isnenghi and E. Cecchinato (1996) Perrone I luoghji della memoria. Simboli e miti dell'Itaia unita (Bari: Laterza).Google Scholar
2.Davis, J. (2006) ‘Brigantaggio’ and ‘Anti-Risorgimento.’ In: M. Isnenghi, E. Cecchinato, D. Ceschin and G. Albanese (Eds) Gli Italiani in guerra: conflitti, identità, memorie dal Risorgimento ai nostri giorni Vol. 1 Fare l'Italia: unità e disunità nel Risorgimento (Turin: UTET).Google Scholar
3.Vivarelli, R. (2008) Fascismo e Storia d'Italia (Bologna: Il Mulino).Google Scholar
4.Pavone, C. (1991) Una guerra civile; un saggio storico sulla moralità della Resistenza (Turin: Bollato Bollinghieri).Google Scholar
5. See McCarthy, P. (1995) The Crisis of the Italian State (New York: St Martin's Press) and G. Orsina (2010) The Republic after Berlusconi: some reflections on historiography, politics and the political use of history in post-1994 Italy. Modern Italy, 15(1), pp. 77–92, who cites Salvatore Lupo: ‘The most elementary outcome, the avoidance of civil war, was also the most important. Romeo's comment about the economy also holds true for politics: we must understand not why Italy is so different from England and France, but why it escaped the destiny of Greece or Spain, which it resembled in many ways in terms of history and geography’, S. Lupo (2004) Partito e antipartito. Una storia politica della prima Repubblica (1946–78) (Rome: Donzelli), p. 21.Google Scholar
6.Orsina, G. (2010) The Republic after Berlusconi: some reflections on historiography, politics and the political use of history in post-1994 Italy. Modern Italy, 15(1), 7792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. See McCarthy, P. (1995) The Crisis of the Italian State (New York: St Martin's Press) and A. Cento Bull (2010) The legacy of the strategy of tension and armed conflict in the context of (non) reconciliation. In: A. Mammone and G. Veltri (Eds) Italy Today. The Sick Man of Europe (London: Routledge), pp. 101–113.Google Scholar
8.McCarthy, P. (1995) The Crisis of the Italian State (New York: St Martin's Press) and P. Ginsborg (2003) Italy and its Discontents. Family, Civil Society, State 1980–2001 (London: Penguin).Google Scholar
9.Davis, J. (2006) ‘Brigantaggio’ and ‘Anti-Risorgimento’. In: M. Isnenghi, E. Cecchinato, D. Ceschin and G. Albanese (Eds) Gli Italiani in guerra: conflitti, identità, memorie dal Risorgimento ai nostri giorni Vol. 1 Fare l'Italia: unità e disunità nel Risorgimento (Turin: UTET).Google Scholar
10. In English see, for example, De Felice, R. and Ledeen, M.A. (1976) Fascism: An Informal Introduction to its Theory and Practice (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books).Google Scholar
11. See Arthurs, J. (2010) Fascism as ‘heritage’ in contemporary Italy. In: A. Mammone and G. Veltri (Eds) Italy Today. The Sick Man of Europe (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
12.Pavone, C. (1991) Una guerra civile; un saggio storico sulla moralità della Resistenza (Turin: Bollato Bollinghieri).Google Scholar
13.Vivarelli, R. (2000) Fine di una stagione. Memoria 1943–45 (Bologna: Il Mulino), and J.E. Miller (1999) Who chopped down that cherry tree? The resistance in history and politics 1945–1998. Journal of Modern Italian Studies, (4, 1), pp. 37–53.Google Scholar
14.Galli della Loggia, E. (1996) La morte della patria: la crisi dell'idea di nazione tra Resistenza, antifascismo e Repubblica (Rome-Bari: Laterza).Google Scholar
15.Bollati, G. (1983) L'Italiano. Il carattere nazionale come storia e come invenzione (Turin: Einaudi), and E. Rusconi (1993) Se cessiamo di essere una nazione (Bologna: Il Mulino).Google Scholar
16. See Avanza, M. (2010) The Northern League and its ‘innocuous’ xenophobia. In: A. Mammone and G. Veltri (Eds) Italy Today. The Sick Man of Europe (London: Routledge), pp. 131142.Google Scholar
17. For example, Dickie, J. (1999) Darkest Italy. The Nation and Stereotypes of the mezzogiorno 1860–1900 (New York: St Martin's Press) and M. Nelson (2002) The View from Vesuvius. Italian Culture and the Southern Question (Berkeley: California University Press).Google Scholar
18. See Allum, F. and Allum, P. (2010) Revisiting Naples. Clientelism and organized crime. In: A. Mammone and G. Veltri (Eds) Italy Today. The Sick Man of Europe (London: Routledge), pp. 185198.Google Scholar
19. See, for example, Roux, C. (2010) When politics matters: Federalism Italian style. In: A. Mammone and G. Veltri (Eds) Italy Today. The Sick Man of Europe (London: Routledge), pp. 6072.Google Scholar