Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:39:38.400Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From the National to a Transnational Paradigm. Writing Literary Histories Today

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2013

Svend Erik Larsen
Svend Erik Larsen*
Affiliation:
Department of Aesthetics and Communication, Section of Comparative Literature, Aarhus University, Langelandsgade 139, DK 8000, Aarhus C, Denmark. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Modern literary history was born, together with the European nation states, in the early 19th century, encapsulating the emerging idea of literature as an articulation of the national mentality. In tandem with other national histories of art, politics, language, religion, culture and nature, literary history took part in the creation of a national identity, as did the literary texts it interpreted and canonized along a historical trajectory with the nation state as its teleological culmination. Literature and literary histories have always been a form of cultural intervention, not just texts. This is still the case, but in a modern transnational and globalized cultural environment, inherited historical paradigms are obsolete as scientific and didactic models. Nevertheless, they still play a dominant role in our educational institutions on all levels. This article discusses the resilience of the national paradigm, points to the institutional and conceptual obstacles for imposing alternative frameworks, but also exemplifies how new historiographical routes may be found.

Type
Focus: Writing a History of European Literature as Part of a World History of Literature
Information
European Review , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , May 2013 , pp. 241 - 251
Copyright
Copyright © Academia Europaea 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Perkins, D. (1992) Is Literary History Possible? (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar
2.Larsen, S.E., Andreasen, B., Jørgensen, M. and Ringgaard, D. (2009) litteraturDK (Copenhagen: Lindhardt & Ringhof).Google Scholar
3.Larsen, S.E. (2011) What is literary historiography? In: K. Kulavkova, N. Avramovska (Eds) New Literary Theory and Hermeneutics (Interpretations vols. 4–5) (Skopje: Macedonian Academy of Science and Arts), pp. 67–92.Google Scholar
4.Bacon, F. (1994) Novum Organum (Chicago: Open Court), p. 113.Google Scholar
5.Vico, G. (1966) La Scienza Nuova e Opere scelte (Torino: Unione Tipografico-Editrice Torinese), p. 299.Google Scholar
6.Kant, I. (1964) Schriften zur Anthropologie, Geschichtsphilosophie, Politik und Pädagogik (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft), p. 101.Google Scholar
7.von Humboldt, W. (1960) Werke 1 (Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft), p. 580.Google Scholar
8.Le Goff, J. (1992) History and Memory (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar
9.de Staël, G. (1959) De la littérature considérée dans ses rapports avec les institutions sociales 1 (Genève: Droz), pp. 92, 149, 147.Google Scholar
10.Larsen, S.E., Andreasen, B., Jørgensen, M. and Ringgaard, D. (2009) litteraturDK (Copenhagen: Lindhardt & Ringhof).Google Scholar
11. The framework is the emerging World Literature paradigm in Literary Studies, see, Schöning, U. (Ed.) (2000) Internationalität nationaler Literaturen (Göttingen: Wallstein); D. Damrosch (2003) What is World Literature? (Princeton: Princeton University Press); D. Pizer (2006) The Idea of World Literature (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press); M.R. Thomsen (2008) Mapping World Literature (London: Continuum); K.-M- Simonsen and J. Stougaard-Nielsen (Eds) (2008) World Literature, World Culture (Aarhus: Aarhus University Press); T. D'haen (2012) The Routledge Concise History of World Literature (London: Routledge), and T. D'haen, D. Damrosch and D. Kadir (Eds) (2012) The Routledge Companion to World Literature (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
12. The website was visited on 20 November 2009.Google Scholar
13. A similar but antipodean perspective can be found in Veit, W. (2008) Globalization and literary history: rethinking comparative literary history – globally. New Literary History. Special Issue: Globalization, 39, pp. 415–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Ghosh, A. (2000) The Glass Palace (New York: HarperCollins), p. 349.Google Scholar