Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:40:14.479Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Foreign Language/Literature as Human and Social Sciences in the Chinese Context

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 April 2016

Zongxin Feng
Zongxin Feng*
Affiliation:
Department of Foreign Languages and Literatures, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Globalization has accelerated international and intercultural exchange in almost all aspects of life and every discipline of study has to take a global perspective for its development. This paper discusses some current issues in China’s ‘foreign language/literature’ sector, at the tertiary level of human and social sciences, and it does so in terms of localized concepts and diverse fields of study, administrative intervention, institutional organization, professional recognition, academic dilemmas, and problems and prospects of development in view of the international context of sociocultural globalization.

Type
Tsinghua–Academia Europaea Symposium on Humanities and Social Sciences, Globalization and China
Information
European Review , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , May 2016 , pp. 335 - 346
Copyright
© Academia Europaea 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References and Notes

1.Institute of Linguistics of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (2002) A Dictionary of Modern Chinese (Beijing: The Commercial Press), p. 1295.Google Scholar
2.Disciplinary Catalogue of the Ministry of Education, China. http://www.chinadegrees.cn/xwyyjsjyxx/xwbl/xwzd/xkml/.Google Scholar
3.Lyons, J. (1980) Language and Linguistics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), p. 37.Google Scholar
4.http://www.fas.harvard.edu/pages/departments-and-areas.Google Scholar
5.http://humsci.stanford.edu/departments/clusters/humanities_and_arts/.Google Scholar
6.http://www.cam.ac.uk/colleges-and-departments.Google Scholar
7.http://www.humanities.ox.ac.uk/faculties_and_units.Google Scholar
8.Confucius (551–479BC) said ‘When one does not have an adequate title he cannot speak in the right name, and therefore he cannot act successfully and accomplish anything’. An alternative and more literal interpretation is: ‘When the name is not proper, words are not expressive, and therefore no success can be expected’. Cf. Xi, Zhu (ed.) (1942) Confucius Analects, Book 13 Zi Lu, 13.3 (Beijing: Zhonghua Books), p. 33.Google Scholar
9.http://www.blcu.edu.cn/. Wenhua ‘culture’ is also defined in Chinese as ‘literacy’ and ‘general knowledge’, and a lack of it is expressed as mei wenhua ‘having no culture’, meaning ‘illiterate or uneducated’. A metalingual statement ‘there is no “culture” in [the name of] the university’ makes a word play.Google Scholar
10.For example, the University of International Business and Economics in Beijing has two foreign-language divisions: yingyu xueyuan ‘school of English’ is titled ‘School of International Studies’ (http://sis.uibe.edu.cn/) and waiyu xueyuan ‘school of foreign languages’ is titled ‘School of Foreign Studies’ (http://sfs.uibe.edu.cn/).Google Scholar
11.http://www.gdufs.edu.cn/.Google Scholar
12.Hu, Z. (2002) Thoughts on China’s English education. Foreign Languages Research, 3, p. 7.Google Scholar
13.Xu, J., Wang, F. and Liu, R. (eds) (1996) Current Situations and Prospects of Chinese Linguistics (Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press).Google Scholar
14.Disciplinary Catalogue of the Ministry of Education, China. http://www.chinadegrees.cn/xwyyjsjyxx/xwbl/xwzd/xkml/.Google Scholar
15.Institute of Linguistics of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (2002) A Dictionary of Modern Chinese (Beijing: The Commercial Press), p. 1295.Google Scholar
16.Fowler, R. (1971) The Languages of Literature (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul), pp. 1–2.Google Scholar
17.Pratt, M. L. (1977) Toward a Speech Act Theory of Literary Discourse (Bloomington: Indiana University Press), p. vii.Google Scholar
18.Love, H. (2002) Attributing Authorship: An Introduction (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 40–49.Google Scholar
19.Booth, W. (1961) The Rhetoric of Fiction (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
20.Chomsky, N. (1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax (Cambridge: The MIT Press), p. 4.Google Scholar
21.Culler, J. (1975) Structuralist Poetics: Structuralism, Linguistics and the Study of Literature (Ithaca: Cornell University Press), pp. 113–130.Google Scholar
22.Li, C. and Xu, B. (2006) Zhongguo jinxiandai waiyu jiaoyu shi (A History of Modern Foreign Language Teaching in China) (Shanghai: Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press).Google Scholar