Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:51:54.705Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The European Nation State: A Great Survivor

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2013

R.C. Van Caenegem
R.C. Van Caenegem*
Affiliation:
Universiteitstraat 4, B 9000 Gent, Belgium. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Today Europe consists of a great number of nation states – some large like Germany, some small like Latvia – where nationhood coincides with statehood. This situation is the result of political upheavals, such as the Italian resorgimento and the waning of the Ottoman Empire in the nineteenth century, and the dismemberment of the Austro-Hungarian Empire and the collapse of the Soviet Union and Communist Yugoslavia in the twentieth century. The process is still going on and the United Kingdom may one day be divided into three nation states, England, Scotland and Ireland. The author explores the origins of the modern state after Europe had passed through the tribal and feudal phases (fifth–twelfth centuries) and the role of the Church in the success of the late medieval monarchies, while making clear that the Church also thwarted their ambition to achieve full sovereignty. The author finally wonders what encouraged the European peoples to achieve independence and national statehood.

Type
Focus: Nation
Information
European Review , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , February 2013 , pp. 28 - 40
Copyright
Copyright © Academia Europaea 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References and Notes

1. See on him Walker, D.M. (ed.) (1981) Stair Tercentenary Studies (Edinburgh: Stair Society).Google Scholar
2. For a critical review of recent changes in the British constitution see Baker, J. (2011) Our unwritten constitution. In: Proceedings of the British Academy, 2009. Lectures (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 91–118.Google Scholar
3. In his De statu imperii Germanici of 1667.Google Scholar
4.Verlinden, C. (1935) Robert Ier le Frison Comte de Flandre (Antwerp, De Sikkel), pp. 66–67.Google Scholar
5.See the detailed study of G. Duby (1953) La société des XIe et XIIe siècles dans la région mâconnaise (Paris: Librairie Armand Colin).Google Scholar
6. S. Kay (ed.) (1991) Raoul de Cambrai (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.So three times in a charter of 1119 for the abbey of Cluny, in A. Luchaire (1883) Histoire des institutions monarchiques de la France sous les premiers Capétiens, II (Paris: Imprimerie Nationale), p. 56, n. 1.Google Scholar
8.See on all this and the concept de la couronne E. Bournazel (1975) Le gouvernement capétien au XIIe siècle (Paris: Presses Universitaires de France), pp. 171–172.Google Scholar
9.In his Tractatus de actionibus of 1256. See R. Feenstra (1974) Fata Iuris Romani. Etudes d'histoire du droit (Leiden: Presses Universitaires de Leyde), pp. 139–149.Google Scholar
10. P. Partner (1982) The Murdered Magicians. The Templars and their Myth (Oxford: Oxford University Press). For a recent assessment of the policies of the king, see E.A.R. Brown (2012) Moral imperatives and conundrums of conscience: reflections on Philip the Fair of France. Speculum, 87, pp. 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Fukuyama, F. (2011) The Origins of Political Order. From Prehuman Times to the French Revolution (London: Profile Books), pp. 78–94 and 229–241.Google Scholar
12. W. Ullmann (1975) Law and Politics in the Middle Ages (London: Hodder & Stoughton), ch. 9, pp. 267–306. Sciencia politica was a newly created phrase.Google Scholar
13. Recently, a new critical edition of this work was published by Shaw, P. (ed.) (2009) Dante Alighieri, Monarchia (Florence: Casa Editrice Le Lettere) (Le Opere di Dante Alighieri, 5).Google Scholar
14.The interdict was a suspension of church services such as mass, baptisms, marriages and funerals. Thus, on a famous occasion Pope Innocent III imposed an interdict on England. See for the details of this protracted conflict, C. Cheney (1972) Pope Innocent III and England (Stuttgart: Hiersemann), Part III, ch. 3, pp. 303–325.Google Scholar
15. W. Ullmann (1975) Law and Politics in the Middle Ages (London: Hodder & Stoughton), p. 283.Google Scholar
16. I refer, of course, to the murder of Thomas Becket, archbishop of Canterbury in 1170 by four knights at the instigation of King Henry II. See the authoritative biography by Barlow, F. (1986) Thomas Becket (London: Weidenfeld). For a more recent appraisal see J.J. Spigelman (2004) Becket and Henry II: the Becket Lectures (Sydney: The St. Thomas More Society). The author is Chief Justice in the Supreme Court of New South Wales.Google Scholar
17. By the end of the thirteenth century ‘the lower ranks of the polity, the gentry and the bourgeoisie had already become Anglophone’. The first administrative texts in English appeared from 1344 onwards, and the Statute of Pleading of 1362 introduced English in the law courts, where Law French remained also in use for a long time. See Ormrod, W.M. (2003) The use of English: language, law and political culture in fourteenth-century England. Speculum, pp. 750–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Douglas, D.C. (1984) William the Conqueror. The Norman Impact upon England (London: Eyre & Spottinwoode), p. 220.Google Scholar
19. This philosophical inspiration was most noticeable in the Austrian civil code of 1811. See Gilardeau, E. (2011) L'ABGB de 1811: une codification kantienne. Revue Historique de Droit Français et Etranger, pp. 407–422.Google Scholar
20.In a recent thoughtful book Professor Sabino Cassese, a judge in the Italian constitutional court, boldly speaks of his country as ‘a society without state’: S. Cassese (2011) L'Italia: una società senza stato? (Bologna: Il Mulino), (note the question mark in the title).Google Scholar
21.Quoted in A.H. Manchester (1980) A Modern Legal History of England and Wales 1750–1950 (London: Butterworths), p. 128. In the eighteenth century there were only four judges in Common Pleas.Google Scholar
22. See the remarks on Kessler's state typology in Ian Buruma's review of Easton, Laird M. (ed.) (2011) Journey to the Abyss: The Diaries of Count Harry Kessler, 1880–1918 (New York: Knopf), in the New York Review of Books, vol. LXI, no. 1, January 12, 2012, p. 20.Google Scholar
23.Gilissen, J. (1967) Die belgische Verfassung von 1831: ihr Ursprung und ihr Einfluss. In: Beiträge zur deutschen und belgischen Verfassungsgeschichte im 19. Jahrhundert (Stuttgart: Ernst Klett Verlag), p. 63.Google Scholar

Further Reading

E. Cortese (1995) Il diritto nella storia medievale, 2 vols. (Rome: Il Cigno Galileo Galilei).Google Scholar
Fukuyama, F. (2011) The Origins of Political Order. From Prehuman Times to the French Revolution (London: Profile Books).Google Scholar
Gaudemet, J. (1994) Eglise et Cité. Histoire du droit canonique (Paris: Montchrestien).Google Scholar
Padoa Schioppa, A. (2005) Storia del diritto in Europa. Dal medioevo all’ età contemporanea (Collezione di Testi e di Studi) (Bologna: Il Mulino).Google Scholar
Van Caenegem, R.C. (1995) An Historical Introduction to Western Constitutional Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wormald, P. (1999) The Making of English Law: King Alfred to the Twelfth Century. Vol. I: Legislation and its limits (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar