Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:22:00.390Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cultures of Migration and Conflict in Contemporary Human Mobility in Turkey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2016

Ibrahim Sirkeci  and
Jeffrey H. Cohen
Ibrahim Sirkeci
Affiliation:
Regent’s Centre for Transnational Studies, Regent’s University London, Inner Circle, Regent’s Park, London NW1 4NS, UK. E-mail: [email protected]
Jeffrey H. Cohen
Affiliation:
Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We approach Turkish mobility using a culture of migration perspective with reference to conflict. Conflicts are defined broadly into an array of situations including minor disputes, tensions or latent conflicts on the one hand and major violent events on the other. These situations, defined along a security continuum shape individual perceptions. Increasing perceptions of human insecurity are positively correlated to a rise in migration propensity. Applied to Turkey’s international migration history we note that major conflicts have determined inflows and outflows of populations and created a Turkish culture of migration, which reinforces continuous population flows between countries of destination and origin. Migration flows between Germany and Turkey are exemplary in this regard.

Type
Turkey and Europe: Cultural Aspects
Information
European Review , Volume 24 , Issue 3 , July 2016 , pp. 381 - 396
Copyright
© Academia Europaea 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References and Notes

1.Sirkeci, I. and Yüceşahin, M. (2014) Editörden: Türkiye’de göç çalışmaları. Göç Dergisi, 1(1), pp. 1–10. http://tplondon.com/dergi/index.php/gd/article/view/2 (accessed 29 October 2014).Google Scholar
2.Biffl, G. (2012) Turkey and Europe: The role of migration and trade in economic development. Migration Letters, 9(1), pp. 47–64.Google Scholar
3.According to the Turkish Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the size of the Turkish community abroad is approximately 5 million people and about 4 million reside in Europe. Available at: http://www.mfa.gov.tr/the-expatriate-turkish-citizens.en.mfa (accessed 30 October 2014).Google Scholar
4.Sirkeci, I. (2005) War in Iraq: Environment of insecurity and international migration. International Migration, 43/4: 197–214.Google Scholar
5.Sirkeci, I. (2000) Exploring the Kurdish population in the Turkish context. Genus, 52, pp. 149–175.Google Scholar
6.Sirkeci, I. (2009) Improving the Immigration and Asylum Statistics in Turkey – Türkiye’de Uluslararası Göçve Sıgınmastatistiklerinin Gelitirilmesi. November 2009, Turkish Statistical Institute, Ankara, Turkey.Google Scholar
7.Figures for 1990 and 2000 are based on Turkish Censuses, while 2011 is an estimation based on OECD data.Google Scholar
8.Estimation based on Turkish Statistics Institute’s address-based population registration system data.Google Scholar
9.Sirkeci, I. and Martin, P. L. (2014) Sources of irregularity and managing migration: the case of Turkey. Border Crossing: Transnational Working Papers, No. 1401, pp. 1–16. Available at: http://www.tplondon.com/journal/index.php/bc/article/viewFile/373/294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Sirkeci, I. (2003) Migration, Ethnicity, and Conflict: Emigration of Turkish Kurds from Turkey to Germany. PhD Thesis, Sheffield: University of Sheffield.Google Scholar
11.Ravenstein, E. G. (1885) The laws of migration. Journal of the Statistical Society of London, 48, pp. 167–235; E. G. Ravenstein (1889) The laws of migration. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 52(2), pp. 241–305.Google Scholar
12.Lee, E. S. (1966) A theory of migration. Demography, 3(1), pp. 47–57. D. B. Grigg (1977) EG Ravenstein and the ‘laws of migration’. Journal of Historical Geography, 3(1), pp. 41–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Grigg, D. B. (1977) EG Ravenstein and the ‘laws of migration’. Journal of Historical Geography, 3/1: 41–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.See Dorigo, G. and Tobler, W. (1983) Push-pull migration laws. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 73, pp. 1–17. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8306.1983.tb01392.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Massey, D. S., Hugo, G. and Taylor, J. E. (1993) Theories of international migration: a review and appraisal. Population and Development Review, 19(3), pp. 431–466.Google Scholar
16.Anthony, D. W. (1990) Migration in archaeology: the baby and the bathwater. American Anthropologist, 92(4), pp. 895–914.Google Scholar
17.Cohen, J. H. and Sirkeci, I. (2011) Cultures of Migration (Austin: University of Texas Press).Google Scholar
18.Levitt, P. and Schiller, N. G. (2004) Conceptualizing simultaneity: a transnational social field perspective on society 1. International Migration Review, 38(3), pp. 1002–1039.Google Scholar
19.Findlay, A. M. and Li, F. L. N. (1999) Methodological issues in researching migration. The Professional Geographer, 51(1), pp. 50–59.Google Scholar
20.The words ‘migrant’ and ‘immigrant’ gained negative connotations and even turned into swear words. See Salomonson, N. and Fellesson, M. (2014) Tricks and tactics used against troublesome travellers - Frontline staff’s experiences from Swedish buses and trains. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 10, pp. 53–59.Google Scholar
21.Alexander, B. K. (2014) Critical autoethnography as intersectional praxis. In: R. M. Boylorn and M. P. Orbe (eds), Critical Autoethnography: Intersecting Cultural Identities in Everyday Life (Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press), pp. 110–122.Google Scholar
22.Used in Turner, F. J. (1906) The colonization of the west, 1820–1830. The American Historical Review, 11(2), pp. 303–327.Google Scholar
23.Conn, H. A. and Budington, R. A. (1927) Physiology and Human Life (Silver: Burdett), H.C. Northcott (1944) The geographic mobility of Canada’s elderly. Canadian Studies in Population, 12(2), pp. 183–202.Google Scholar
24.Recchi, E. (2006) From migrants to movers: citizenship and mobility in the European Union. In: M. P. Smith and A. Favell (eds), The Human Face of Global Mobility (New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers), pp. 53–77.Google Scholar
25.Castles, S. (2010) Understanding global migration: a social transformation perspective. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(10), pp. 1565–1586.Google Scholar
26.Hammar, T. (1995) Development and immobility: why have not many more emigrants left the south? Causes of International Migration (Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities), pp. 173–186.Google Scholar
27.Sirkeci, I. and Martin, P. L. (2014) Sources of irregularity and managing migration: the case of Turkey. Border Crossing: Transnational Working Papers, No. 1401, pp. 1–16. Available at: http://www.tplondon.com/journal/index.php/bc/article/viewFile/373/294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Dahrendorf, R. (1959) Class and Class Conflict in Industrial Society (Stanford: Stanford University Press), p. 135.Google Scholar
29.For a series of cases and discussions on the environment of human insecurity, please see: I. Sirkeci (2009) Transnational Mobility and Conflict. Migration Letters, 6(1), pp. 3–14. Also: I. Sirkeci (2003) Migration, Ethnicity, Conflict. PhD dissertation, (Sheffield, UK: University of Sheffield) and I. Sirkeci, J. H. Cohen and P. Yazgan (eds) (2016) Conflict, Insecurity, and Mobility (London: Transnational Press London).Google Scholar
30.Further details of the handbook, data and methodology can be found Jenkins, J. C., Taylor, C. L., Abbott, M., Maher, T. V. and Peterson, L. (2012) The World Handbook of Political Indicators IV (Columbus, OH: Mershon Center for International Security Studies, The Ohio State University), Available at: https://sociology.osu.edu/worldhandbook (accessed 1 October 2013).Google Scholar
31.The data set is computer-generated parsed information from Reuters newswires into categories of actors and events. Newswire data from Reuters are beneficial for cross-comparative research because this agency has ‘approximately 16,900 staff in 94 countries, including 2,400 editorial staff in 196 bureaus around the world’ (Reuters 2007).Google Scholar
32.‘The size and global representation of Reuters ensures that this agency is able to report on a large number of events in every part of the world on daily bases’, p. 58 in Maher, T. V. and Peterson, L. (2008) Time and country variation in contentious politics: multilevel modelling of dissent and repression. International Journal of Sociology, 38(3), pp. 52–81.Google Scholar
33.Official figures tend to indicate much lower volumes. The total number of immigrants arrived in the late Ottoman Empire and Modern Turkey from 1912 until 1927 Census is estimated to be 844,984. See Behar, C. (2003) The Population of the Ottoman Empire and Turkey (Ankara: State Institute of Statistics Republic of Turkey), p. 62.Google Scholar
34.See Aktar, A. (2012) Tax me to the end of my life! In B. C. Fortna et al. (eds), State-Nationalisms in the Ottoman Empire, Greece and Turkey: Orthodox and Muslims, 1830–1945 (Oxon: Routledge), p. 198.Google Scholar
35.Zayas, A. D. (2007) The Istanbul Pogrom of 6–7 September 1955 in the light of international law. Genocide Studies and Prevention, 2(2), pp. 137–154.Google Scholar
36.Güven, D. (2011) Riots against the non-Muslims of Turkey: 6/7 September 1955 in the context of demographic engineering. European Journal of Turkish Studies. Social Sciences on Contemporary Turkey, 12.Google Scholar
37.Alford, J. (ed.) (1984) Greece and Turkey: Adversity in Alliance (Aldershot, Hants: Gower).Google Scholar
38.Sirkeci, I., Cohen, J. H. and Yazgan, P. (2012) Turkish culture of migration: flows between Turkey and Germany, socio-economic development and conflict. Migration Letters, 9(1), pp. 33–46.Google Scholar
39.Hale, W. M. (1981) The Political and Economic Development of Modern Turkey (London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
40.Arı, K. (1995) Büyükmübadele: Türkiye’yezorunlugöç, 1923–1925 (Vol. 17) (Tarih Vakfı Yurt Yayınları).Google Scholar
41.Seker, B. D. and Sirkeci, I. (2014) The Turkish born women in London and their adaptation processes. Paper presented at the Turkish Migration Conference 2014, Regent’s Centre for Transnational Studies, Regent’s University London, UK, 30 May–1 June 2014.Google Scholar
42.According to the 2011 UK Census, the number of people stated Turkish as their main language was 99,423 and it was 48,239 for Kurdish. Available at: http://www.nomisweb.co.uk/census/2011/qs204ew (accessed 30 October 2014).Google Scholar
43.Baser, B. (2012) Inherited Conflicts: Spaces of Contention between Turkish and Kurdish Second Generation Diasporas in Sweden and Germany (Doctoral dissertation, PhD Thesis, Florence, European University Institute).Google Scholar
44.Sirkeci, I. and Zeynelolu, S. (2014) Abwanderung aus Deutschland in die Türkei: Eine Trendwende im Migrationsgeschehen? In: S. Alscher and A. Krienbriek, (eds), Abwanderung von TürkeistämmigenWer verlässt Deutschland und warum? (Germany: BAMF), pp. 30–85.Google Scholar
45.Akkoyunlu, Ş. (2012) intervening opportunities and competing migrants in Turkish migration to Germany, 1969–2008. Migration Letters, 9(2), pp. 155–175.Google Scholar
46.Federal Foreign Office, Germany, available at: http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/EN/Aussenpolitik/Laender/Laenderinfos/01-Nodes/Tuerkei_node.html (accessed 30 October 2014).Google Scholar
47.It is important to note that those with dual citizenship are reported as Turkish citizen in Turkish censuses.Google Scholar
48.Zeyneloglu, S. and Sirkeci, I. (2014) Türkiye’de Almanlar ve Almancılar. Göç Dergisi, 1(1), pp. 77–118. http://tplondon.com/dergi/index.php/gd/article/view/5 (accessed 29 October 2014).Google Scholar