Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:13:01.863Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Corruption and its Impact on Protest Activities in Post-communist Europe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2021

Milan Školník Open the ORCID record for Milan Školník [Opens in a new window]
Milan Školník*
Affiliation:
Philosophical Faculty of the University of Hradec Králové, Department of Political Science, Hradec Králové, Czech Republic. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Corruption is a phenomenon that affects societies. It lowers trust in public institutions, lowers trust among people, undermines economic development, undermines democracy, and has implications for political participation. This article contributes to current debates on the impact of corruption by looking at other possible consequences of corruption. Specifically, this article looks at the impact of the perception of corruption on the approval of public protest meetings and demonstrations because, if corruption leads to these non-institutionalized forms of political participation, this may lead to security problems or a direct outbreak of violence. This study analyses this relationship by using seven post-communist countries that have undergone specific developments in terms of corruption. These developments were largely due to large-scale privatizations, politicized state administration, and the linking of politicians to the private sector. This research was conducted with individual-level data. The module ‘The Role of Government V’ from the International Social Survey Programme was used. Descriptive charts have revealed that in six out of the seven countries, most respondents considered politicians to be very corrupt. Around 80% of respondents in all seven countries approve of the organization of public protest meetings. Around 70% of respondents in all seven countries approve of demonstrations. Regression analysis revealed that there is a relationship between the perception of corruption among politicians and the approval of protest activities. Specifically, the more politicians are corrupt, the more people approve of holding public protest meetings and demonstrations.

Type
Article
Information
European Review , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , June 2022 , pp. 393 - 407
Copyright
© 2021 Academia Europaea

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Avenburg, A (2017) Corruption, accountability and citizen participation in protests in Latin America. Revista Debates 11(3), 11–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baboš, P (2015) Corruption experience, perception and anti-corruption trust: different effects in various post-communist states. Romanian Journal of Political Sciences (1), 107–128.Google Scholar
Balán, M (2011) Competition by denunciation: the political dynamics of corruption scandals in Argentina and Chile. Comparative Politics 43(4), 459–478. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041511796301597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldock, G (2016) The perception of corruption across Europe, Middle East and Africa. Journal of Financial Crime 23(1), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-02-2015-0004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bašná, K (2019) Income inequality and level of corruption in post-communist European countries between 1995 and 2014. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 52(2), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2019.05.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayar, Y, Odabas, H, Sasmaz, MU and Ozturk, OF (2018) Corruption and shadow economy in transition economies of European Union countries: a panel cointegration and causality analysis. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja 31(1), 1940–1952. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2018.1498010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bohrer, RE, Pacek, AC and Radcliff, B (2000) Electoral participation, ideology, and party politics in post-communist Europe. The Journal of Politics 62(4), 1161–1172. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-3816.00051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cieślik, A and Goczek, Ł (2018a) Corruption, privatisation and economic growth in post-communist countries. Europe-Asia Studies 70(8), 1303–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2018.1511771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cieślik, A and Goczek, Ł (2018b) Initial conditions and privatisation as causes of post-communist corruption. Post-Communist Economies 30(1), 36–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2017.1361693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimitrova, AL (2018) The uncertain road to sustainable democracy: elite coalitions, citizen protests and the prospects of democracy in Central and Eastern Europe. East European Politics 34(3), 257–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2018.1491840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fazekas, M and King, LP (2019) Perils of development funding? The tale of EU Funds and grand corruption in Central and Eastern Europe. Regulation & Governance 13(3), 405–430. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ficeac, B (2013) The ‘culture of corruption’ in the post-communist space. Economic indicators, transition indices and cultural dimensions vs. the perception of corruption. Revista de Cercetare Si Interventie Sociala 43, 215–239.Google Scholar
Gingerich, DW (2009) Corruption and political decay: evidence from Bolivia. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 4(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00008003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grødeland, ÅB and Aasland, A (2011) Fighting corruption in public procurement in post-communist states: obstacles and solutions. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 44(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2011.01.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochstetler, K (2006) Rethinking presidentialism: challenges and presidential falls in South America. Comparative Politics 38(4), 401–418. https://doi.org/10.2307/20434009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, L (1997) Corruption and the crisis of the post-communist state. Crime, Law and Social Change 27(3–4), 275–297. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008271702238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, L (2013) Postcommunist transitions and corruption: mapping patterns. Social Research: An International Quarterly 80(4), 1163–1186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holmes, L (2017) Curbing post-communist corruption: external pressure vs. domestic commitment. In Fish, SM, Graeme, G and Milenko, P (eds), A Quarter Century of Post-Communism Assessed. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 99–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43437-7_5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutcheson, DS (2004) Disengaged or disenchanted? The vote ‘against all’ in post-communist Russia. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 20(1), 98–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523270410001687127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ISSP Research Group (2018) International Social Survey Programme: Role of Government V – ISSP 2016. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA6900 Data file Version 2.0.0. https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jin, J (2016) Female participation and corruption in the public sector. International Review of Public Administration 21(4), 305–319. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2016.1270577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khandekar, A and Reddy, DS (2015) An Indian summer: corruption, class, and the Lokpal protests. Journal of Consumer Culture 15(2), 221–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469540513498614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kostadinova, T (2003) Voter turnout dynamics in post-Communist Europe. European Journal of Political Research 42(6), 741–759. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.00102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kostadinova, T (2009) Abstain or rebel: corruption perceptions and voting in East European elections. Politics & Policy 37(4), 691–714. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2009.00194.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kostadinova, T (2012) Political Corruption in Eastern Europe: Politics after Communism. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Ledeneva, A (2009) Corruption in postcommunist societies in Europe: a re-examination. Perspectives on European Politics and Society 10(1), 69–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/15705850802700017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machado, F, Scartascini, C and Tommasi, M (2011) Political institutions and street protests in Latin America. Journal of Conflict Resolution 55(3), 340–365. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002711400864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, DS (2003) Fairness matters: equity and the transition to democracy. World Policy Journal 20(4), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.1215/07402775-2004-1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAllister, I and White, S (2008) Voting ‘against all’ in postcommunist Russia. Europe-Asia Studies 60(1), 67–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668130701760349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Liñán, A (2007) Presidential Impeachment and the New Political Instability in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popova, M and Post, V (2018) Prosecuting high-level corruption in Eastern Europe. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 51(3), 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.postcomstud.2018.06.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sajó, A (2003) From corruption to extortion: Conceptualization of post-communist corruption. Crime, Law and Social Change 40(2–3), 171–194. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025736621543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, D (2007) Anti-corruption: what do we know? Research on preventing corruption in the post-communist world. Political Studies Review 5(2), 202–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-9299.2007.00129.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, Y (1991) The Chinese protests of 1989: the issue of corruption. Asian Survey 31(8), 762–782. https://doi.org/10.2307/2645228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilly, C (2003) The Politics of Collective Violence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar