Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:20:07.390Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Artistic Research in the SATORI Common Ethical Framework

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2020

Lucille Holmes
Lucille Holmes*
Affiliation:
Elam School of Fine Arts, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland1142, New Zealand. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It is well known that academic research which includes human participants undergoes an ethical review which, in many countries today, includes all academic disciplines and not only medical science. But what about those disciplines with the least experience of ethical codes for research, such as the visual and performing arts? How are they defined and positioned in ethical codes and guidelines that are intended to apply to all disciplines? What are the challenges to ethical frameworks which aim to be inclusive of the visual and performing arts? This article examines the European Commission-funded SATORI project (Stakeholders Acting Together On the ethical impact assessment of Research and Innovation) in its aim to produce the first comprehensive, international standard for the ethical assessment of research in all fields including the arts.

Type
Articles
Information
European Review , Volume 28 , Issue 4 , August 2020 , pp. 636 - 647
Copyright
© Academia Europaea 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arlander, A (2010) Characteristics of visual and performing arts. In Biggs, M and Karlsson, H (eds), The Routledge Companion to Research in the Arts. London: Routledge, pp. 315–332.Google Scholar
Bachmann, M (2015) Wanna Play? Dries Verhoeven and the limits of non-professional performance. Performance Paradigm 11, 88–100. Available at www.performanceparadigm.net/index.php/journal/article/view/164/162 (accessed 7 January 2017).Google Scholar
Benčin, R, Šumič-Riha, J and Riha, R (2015) Ethics assessment in different fields: humanities. Annex 2.e, Ethical assessment of research and innovation: a comparative analysis of practices and institutions in the EU and selected other countries, SATORI Deliverable 1.1. Available at http://satoriproject.eu/media/2.e-Humanities.pdf (accessed 7 October 2017).Google Scholar
Biggs, M and Büchler, D (2010) Communities, values, conventions and actions. In Biggs, M and Karlsson, H (eds), The Routledge Companion to Research in the Arts. London: Routledge, pp. 82–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biggs, M and Karlsson, H (2010) Evaluating quality in artistic research. In Biggs, M and Karlsson, H (eds), The Routledge Companion to Research in the Arts. London: Routledge, pp. 405–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolt, B (2016) Whither the aesthetic alibi: ethics and the challenge of art as research in the academy. In Warr, D, Waycott, J, Guillemin, M and Cox, S (eds), Ethics and Visual Research Methods: Theory, Methodology, and Practice. London: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 187–200.Google Scholar
Bolt, B, MacNeill, K and Ednie-Brown, P (2014) Creative practice, research ethics and the doctoral thesis. In Ravelli, L, Paltridge, B and Starfield, S (eds), Doctoral Writing in the Creative and Performing Arts. Oxfordshire: Libri Publishing, pp. 79–96.Google Scholar
College Art Association (CAA ) (2011) Artist Code of Ethics. Available at www.collegeart.org/standards-and-guidelines/guidelines/practices (accessed 25 November 2018).Google Scholar
Dahlgren, A (2016) Contemporary art, criminal acts and media events. Konsthistorisk tidskrift/Journal of Art History 85(2), 181–198. doi-org.ezproxy.auckland.ac.nz/10.1080/00233609.2015.1132763 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, L, Stuart Katz, J and Ruby, J (1988) Introduction: a moral pause. In Gross, L, Stuart Katz, J and Ruby, J (eds), Image Ethics: The Moral Rights of Subjects in Photographs, Film, and Television. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–33.Google Scholar
Gurzawska, A and Benčin, R (2015) Ethics assessment in different fields: social sciences. Annex 2.d, Ethical assessment of research and innovation: a comparative analysis of practices and institutions in the EU and selected other countries. SATORI Deliverable 1.1. Available at http://satoriproject.eu/media/2.d-Social-Sciences.pdf (accessed 2 September 2017).Google Scholar
Iphofen, R (2017) Achieving consensus in research ethics: An interim conclusion and some recommendations. In Iphofen, R (ed), Finding Common Ground: Consensus in Research Ethics across the Social Sciences. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing, pp. 211–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jansen, P, Reijers, W, Douglas, D, Sattarov, F, Gurzawska, A, Kapeller, A, Brey, P, Benčin, R, Warso, Z and Braun, R (2017) A reasoned proposal for shared approaches to ethics assessment in the European context. SATORI Deliverable D4.1. Available at http://satoriproject.eu/media/D4.1_Proposal_Ethics_Assessment_Framework.pdf (accessed 7 December 2018).Google Scholar
Kjørup, S (2010) Pleading for plurality: artistic and other kinds of research. In Biggs, M and Karlsson, H (eds), The Routledge Companion to Research in the Arts. London: Routledge, pp. 24–43.Google Scholar
Marshall, J (2008) Personal Freedom Through Human Rights Law?: Autonomy, Identity and Integrity under the European Convention on Human Rights. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.Google Scholar
Matthews, SL (2016) Protesting the privilege of perception: resistance to documentary work in Hale County, Alabama, 1900–2010. Southern Cultures 22(1), 31–65. doi:10.1353/scu.2016.0005.Google Scholar
Newbury, D (2010) Research training in the creative arts and design. In Biggs, M and Karlsson, H (eds), The Routledge Companion to Research in the Arts. London: Routledge, pp. 368–387.Google Scholar
Owen, M (2002) Engaging the humanities? Research ethics in Canada. Journal of Research Administration 33(3), 5–12. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A95790882/AONE?u=learn&sid=AONE&xid=822fddbf Google Scholar
Shelley-Egan, C, Brey, P, Rodrigues, R, Douglas, D, Gurzawska, A, Bitsch, L, Wright, D and Wadhwa, K (2016) Ethical assessment of research and innovation: a comparative analysis of practices and institutions in the EU and selected other countries. SATORI Deliverable D1.1. Available at http://satoriproject.eu/media/D1.1_Ethical-assessment-of-RI_a-comparative-analysis.pdf (accessed 16 April 2018).Google Scholar
Stenmark, CK, Antes, AL, Martin, LE, Bagdasarov, Z, Johnson, JF, Devenport, LD and Mumford, MD (2010) Ethics in the humanities: findings from focus groups. Journal of Academic Ethics 8(4), 285–300. https://doi-org.ezproxy.auckland.ac.nz/10.1007/s10805-010-9120-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verhoeven, D (2014) Wanna Play? – a reflection by Dries Verhoeven. Available at http://room404.net/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/wanna_play-een_reflectie_eng_def.pdf (accessed 8 April 2018).Google Scholar
Waern, A (2016) The ethics of unaware participation in public interventions. CHI ’16 Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, CA, USA, 7–12 May 2016, pp. 803–814. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858188 (accessed 18 May 2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, J (2018) Artists in the University: Positioning Artistic Research in Higher Education. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar