Hostname: page-component-f554764f5-nqxm9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-11T13:51:24.215Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Agriculture–Environment Relationship and Environment-based Agricultural Support Instruments in Turkey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2020

Onur Yeni Open the ORCID record for Onur Yeni [Opens in a new window]  and
Özgür Teoman
Onur Yeni
Affiliation:
Department of Economics and Social Policy Research Centre, Hacettepe University, Beytepe Campus, 06800, Çankaya, Ankara, Turkey. Email: [email protected]
Özgür Teoman
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study aims to present the environmental performance of agriculture in Turkey, focusing on the post-2000 period, and to evaluate the agri-environmental support instruments in Turkey in light of the data obtained. According to the findings, it can be asserted that, in spite of several positive developments, Turkey’s agriculture seems to be far from sustainable. The number of farmers and the extent of the agricultural land aided by the support instruments account for very small portions of the total figures. At the same time, the amount of support provided to producers also has a very small share of the total agricultural support. Considering the findings about agri-environmental performance and agri-environmental support instruments together, we suggest that while the use of these support instruments is a positive step, the supports have not had an impact on inducing a green transition in agriculture yet. Uncertainties caused by legislative changes, amounts of support falling short of the cost of a green transition in agriculture, lack of knowledge and training activities regarding environment-friendly agricultural methods, and lack of effective organization of agricultural producers are thought to be among the reasons for this result.

Type
Articles
Information
European Review , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , April 2022 , pp. 194 - 218
Copyright
© 2020 Academia Europaea

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Aküzüm, T, Çakmak, B and Gökalp, Z (2010) Türkiye’de su kaynakları yönetiminin değerlendirilmesi. Tarım Bilimleri Araştırma Dergisi 3, 67–4.Google Scholar
Ataseven, Y and Sumelius, J (2014) The evaluation of agri-environmental policies in Turkey and the European Union. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin 23, 2045–2053.Google Scholar
Atiyas, İ and Bakış, O (2013) Aggregate and Sectoral TFP Growth in Turkey: A Growth Accounting Exercise. TÜSİAD-Sabancı University Competition Forum Working Paper No. 2013-1. Available at https://ref.sabanciuniv.edu/sites/ref.sabanciuniv.edu/files/tfp_tur_refwp.pdf (accessed 3 February 2018).Google Scholar
Aydın, B, Özkan, E, Aktürk, D, Kiracı, MA and Hurma, H (2015) Kırklareli, Edirne, Tekirdağ ve Çanakkale illerinde üreticilerin iyi tarım uygulamalarına yaklaşımı. Tarım Ekonomisi Araştırmaları Dergisi 1, 28–41.Google Scholar
Boz, İ (2016) Effects of environmentally friendly agricultural land protection programs: evidence from the Lake Seyfe area of Turkey. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 15, 1903–1914, doi.org/10.1016/S2095-3119(15)61271-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burjorjee, P, Nelis, Y and Roth, B (2017) Land cooperatives as a model for sustainable agriculture: a case study in Germany. Master’s thesis, Blekinge Technology Institute. Available at http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1111078/FULLTEXT02 (accessed 23 August 2018).Google Scholar
Çetin, M (2020) Agricultural water use. In Harmancıoğlu, NB and Altınbilek, D (eds), Water Resources of Turkey. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, pp. 257–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Çetin, B and Vardar, A (2008) An economic analysis of energy requirements and input costs for tomato production in Turkey. Renewable Energy 33, 428–433, doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2007.03.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dağhan, H and Öztürk, M (2015) Soil pollution in Turkey and remediation methods. In Hakeem, KR, Sabir, M, Öztürk, M and Mermut, AR (eds), Soil Remediation and Plants: Prospects and Challenges. New York: Academic Press, pp. 287–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demiryürek, K, Stopes, C and Güzel, A (2008) Organic agriculture: the case of Turkey. Outlook on Agriculture 37, 261–267, doi.org/10.5367/000000008787167754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DSİ (State Hydraulic Works) (2017) DSİ Genel Müdürlüğü 2017 faaliyet raporu [Annual Report of the General Directorate of State Hydraulic Works 2017]. Ankara: Devlet Su İşleri Genel Müdürlüğü.Google Scholar
Eruygur, O, Kıymaz, T and Küçüker, MC (2016) Türk tarımında rekabet edebilirlik ve toplam faktör verimliliği. Ekonomik Yaklaşım 27, 237–279, doi.org/10.5455/ey.35960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eurostat (2019a) Agri-Environmental Indicator – Soil Erosion. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php/Agri-environmental_indicator_-_soil_erosion (accessed 17 January 2020).Google Scholar
Eurostat (2019b) Annual Freshwater Abstraction by Source and Sector. Available at https://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=env_wat_abs&lang=en (accessed 16 January 2020).Google Scholar
Evrendilek, F and Ertekin, C (2002) Agricultural sustainability in Turkey: integrating food, environmental and energy securities. Land Degradation and Development 13, 61–67, doi.org/10.1002/ldr.480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAO (2017) Water for Sustainable Food and Agriculture: A Report Produced for the G20 Presidency of Germany. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
FAO (2019a) FAOSTAT Inputs/Land Use Domain. Available at http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/RL (accessed 10 January 2020).Google Scholar
FAO (2019b) FAOSTAT Fertilizers by Nutrient. Available at http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/RFN (accessed 15 January 2020).Google Scholar
FAO (2019c) FAOSTAT Pesticides Use Dataset. Available at http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/RP (accessed 15 January 2020).Google Scholar
FAO (2019d) FAOSTAT Emissions Database, Agriculture, Agriculture Total. Available at http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/GT (accessed 30 January 2020).Google Scholar
FAO (2019e) FAOSTAT Macro Indicators Database. Available at http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/MK (accessed 30 January 2020).Google Scholar
Görücü, Ö, Akça, E and Apaydın, E (2017) Çölleşme ile Mücadele Ulusal Stratejisi ve Eylem Planı Değerlendirme Raporu [Evaluation Report for National Strategy and Action Plan to Combat Desertification]. Ankara: T.C. Orman ve Su İşleri Bakanlığı Çölleşme ve Erozyonla Mücadele Genel Müdürlüğü.Google Scholar
Hansen, JW (1996) Is agricultural sustainability a useful concept? Agricultural Systems 50, 117–143, doi.org/10.1016/0308-521X(95)00011-S.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hasdemir, M and Hasdemir, M (2016) Türkiye’de çevre amaçlı tarım arazilerini koruma programı uygulamaları [Implementation of Environmentally Based Agricultural Land Protection Program in Turkey]. In Sarı S, Gencer AH and Sözen İ (eds), Proceedings of International Conference on Eurasian Economies 2016. İstanbul: Beykent University Publications, pp. 496–502.Google Scholar
Ikerd, JE (1990) Agriculture’s search for sustainability and profitability. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 45, 18–23.Google Scholar
Kanber, R and Ünlü, M (2008) Türkiye’de sulama ve drenaj sorunları: Genel bakış [Irrigation and Drainage Problems in Turkey: Overview]. In Sulama-Drenaj Konferansı Bildiri Kitabı [Proceedings of Conference on Irrigation-Drainage]. Adana: T.C. Çevre ve Orman Bakanlığı DSİ VI: Bölge Müdürlüğü, pp. 1–45.Google Scholar
Karabat, S and Atış, E (2012) Manisa ili bağ alanlarında kullanılan tarımsal ilaçların gıda güvenliğine etkisinin koşullu değerleme yöntemiyle analizi. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 49, 17–25.Google Scholar
Kendirli, B, Çakmak, B and Uçar, Y (2005) Salinity in the southeastern Anatolia project (GAP), Turkey: Issues and options. Irrigation and Drainage 54, 115–122, doi.org/10.1002/ird.157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kük, M and Burgess, P (2010) The pressures on, and the responses to, the state of soil and water resources of Turkey. Ankara Üniversitesi Çevrebilimleri Dergisi 2, 199–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundell, M, Lampietti, J, Pertev, R, Pohlmeier, L, Akder, H, Ocek, E and Shreyasi, J (2004) Turkey: A Review of the Impact of the Reform of Agricultural Sector Subsidization. Washington, DC: World Bank. Available at http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/484361468121476788/pdf/346410turkey1ag1complete.pdf (accessed 18 July 2018).Google Scholar
MoAF (T.R. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry) (2018) Agri-Environmental Support Data. Data accessed on official request.Google Scholar
MoD (T.R. Ministry of Development) (2014a) Onuncu Kalkınma Planı (2014-2018) Tarım Özel İhtisas Komisyonu Tarım Arazilerinin Sürdürülebilir Kullanımı Çalışma Grubu Raporu [Tenth Development Plan (2014-2018) Report for Sustainable Use of Agricultural Lands of the Workgroup under Specialization Commission on Agriculture]. Ankara: T.C. Kalkınma Bakanlığı.Google Scholar
MoD (2014b) Onuncu Kalkınma Planı (2014-2018) 2014 Yılı Programı [Tenth Development Plan (2014-2018) 2014 Annual Programme]. Ankara: T.C. Kalkınma Bakanlığı. Available at http://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/2014_Yılı_Programı.docx (accessed 15 December 2018).Google Scholar
MoD (2015) Onuncu Kalkınma Planı (2014-2018) 2015 Yılı Programı [Tenth Development Plan (2014-2018) 2015 Annual Programme]. Ankara: T.C. Kalkınma Bakanlığı. Available at http://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/2015_programı_15_12_2014.pdf (accessed 15 December 2018).Google Scholar
MoD (2016) Onuncu Kalkınma Planı (2014-2018) 2016 Yılı Programı [Tenth Development Plan (2014-2018) 2016 Annual Programme]. Ankara: T.C. Kalkınma Bakanlığı. Available at http://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/2016_Programı.pdf (accessed 15 December 2018).Google Scholar
MoD (2017) Onuncu Kalkınma Planı (2014-2018) 2017 Yılı Programı [Tenth Development Plan (2014-2018) 2017 Annual Programme]. Ankara: T.C. Kalkınma Bakanlığı. Available at http://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/2017_Programı_ResmiGazeteNushası.pdf (accessed 15 December 2018).Google Scholar
MoD (2018) Onuncu Kalkınma Planı (2014-2018) 2018 Yılı Programı [Tenth Development Plan (2014-2018) 2018 Annual Programme]. Ankara: T.C. Kalkınma Bakanlığı. Available at http://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/2018_Yılı_Programı.pdf (accessed 15 December 2018).Google Scholar
MoEU (T.R. Ministry of Environment and Urbanization) (2018) Çevresel Göstergeler-Tarım İlacı Kullanımı [Environmental Indicators-Pesticide Use]. Available at https://cevreselgostergeler.csb.gov.tr/tarim-ilaci-pestisit-kullanimi-i-85834 (accessed 24 December 2019).Google Scholar
MoEU (2019) Türkiye Çevre Sorunları ve Öncelikleri Değerlendirme Raporu (2017 yılı verileriyle) [Turkey Environmental Problems and Priorities Assessment Report (with 2017 data)]. Ankara: T.C. Çevre ve Şehircilik Bakanlığı.Google Scholar
MoFAL (T.R. Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock) (2014) Tarımsal Destekler Bülteni 2014 [Bulletin on Agricultural Supports 2014]. Ankara: T.C. Gıda, Tarım ve Hayvancılık Bakanlığı.Google Scholar
MoFAL (2015) Tarımsal Destekler Bülteni 2015 [Bulletin on Agricultural Supports 2015]. Ankara: T.C. Gıda, Tarım ve Hayvancılık Bakanlığı.Google Scholar
MoFAL (2016a) Tarımsal Destekler Bülteni 2016 [Bulletin on Agricultural Supports 2016]. Ankara: T.C. Gıda, Tarım ve Hayvancılık Bakanlığı.Google Scholar
MoFAL (2016b) Communique on the Application of Cabinet Decree on Supporting Producers Preferring Environmentally Based Agricultural Land Protection Program. Available at http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2016/03/20160331-7.htm (accessed 30 July 2018).Google Scholar
MoFAL (2018) Tarımsal Destekler Bülteni 2018 [Bulletin on Agricultural Supports 2018]. Ankara: T.C. Gıda, Tarım ve Hayvancılık Bakanlığı.Google Scholar
MoFWA (T.R. Ministry of Forestry and Water Affairs) (2013) Çölleşme ile Mücadele Eylem Planı: 2013-2017 [Action Plan for Combatting Erosion: 2013-2017]. Ankara: T.C. Orman ve Su İşleri Bakanlığı Çölleşme ve Erozyonla Mücadele Genel Müdürlüğü.Google Scholar
OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2012) Water Quality and Agriculture: Meeting the Policy Challenge. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264168060-en.Google Scholar
OECD (2016) Innovation, Agricultural Productivity and Sustainability in Turkey. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264261198-en.Google Scholar
OECD (2017) Water Risk Hotspots for Agriculture. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264279551-en.Google Scholar
OECD (2019a) OECD Agri-Environmental Indicators Database. Available at https://stats.oecd.org/Index.aspx?QueryId=79425&lang=en (accessed 31 January 2019).Google Scholar
OECD (2019b) Nutrient Balance (indicator). Available at https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/agriculture-and-food/nutrient-balance/indicator/english_82add6a9-en (accessed 31 January 2019).Google Scholar
Özbilge, Z (2007) An analysis of organic agriculture in Turkey: the current situation and basic constraints. Journal of Central European Agriculture 8, 213–222.Google Scholar
Özden, A (2014) Total factor productivity growth in Turkish agriculture: 1992–2012. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science 20, 469–473.Google Scholar
Özerol, G and Bressers, H (2017) How do farmers align with the agri-environmental changes in irrigated agriculture? A case study from the Harran Plain, Turkey. Irrigation and Drainage 66, 45–59, https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.2064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polat, K and Dellal, İ (2016a) Ramsar alanlarda iyi tarım uygulamaları yapan üreticilerin iklim değişikliği algısı: Göksu Deltası örneği Tarım Ekonomisi Araştırmaları Dergisi 2, 51–62.Google Scholar
Polat, K and Dellal, İ (2016b) Göksu Deltası’nda çeltik yetiştiriciliği yapan üreticilerin iklim değişikliği algısı ve iyi tarım uygulamaları yapmalarında etkili faktörlerin belirlenmesi. Tarım Ekonomisi Araştırmaları Dergisi 2, 46–54.Google Scholar
Redman, M and Hemmami, M (2008) Developing a National Agri-environmental Programme for Turkey. Ankara: T.C. Tarım ve Köyişleri Bakanlığı. Available at http://www.efncp.org/download/Turkey-agri-environment-and-HNV-farming-report.pdf (accessed 30 July 2018).Google Scholar
SBD (Strategy and Budget Directorate) (2019) 2019 Yılı Cumhurbaşkanlığı Yıllık Programı [2019 Annual Programme of the Presidency of the Republic of Turkey]. Ankara: T.C. Cumhurbaşkanlığı Strateji ve Bütçe Başkanlığı. Available at http://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/2019_Yili_Cumhurbaskanligi_Yillik_Programi.pdf (accessed 20 February 2019).Google Scholar
Song, Y, Qi, G, Zhang, Y and Vernooy, R (2014) Farmer cooperatives in China: diverse pathways to sustainable rural development. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 12, 95–108, doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2013.858443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SPO (State Planning Organization) (2013) Dokuzuncu Kalkınma Planı (2007-2013) 2013 Yılı Programı [Ninth Development Plan (2007-2013) 2013 Annual Programme]. Ankara: T.C. Başbakanlık Devlet Planlama Teşkilatı. Available at http://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/2013_Yılı_Programı.doc (accessed 15 December 2018).Google Scholar
Toprak, FE (2015) Avrupa Birliği’nde Yeşil Tarım Uygulamaları ve Türkiye ile Karşılaştırılması [Green Agricultural Practices in the European Union and Their Comparison with Turkey]. Specialization thesis. Ankara: T.C. Gıda Tarım ve Hayvancılık Bakanlığı.Google Scholar
TurkStat (2018) Crop Production Statistics Database (Agricultural Pesticides Statistics). Available at http://www.turkstat.gov.tr/PreTablo.do?alt_id=1001 (accessed 12 December 2018).Google Scholar
TurkStat (2019) Crop Production Statistics-Central Dissemination System. Available at https://biruni.tuik.gov.tr/medas/?kn=92&locale=tr (accessed 24 December 2019).Google Scholar
Unakıtan, G, Hurma, H and Yılmaz, F (2010) An analysis of energy use efficiency of canola production in Turkey. Energy 35, 3623–3627, doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.05.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UNEP (United Nations Environment Programme) (2011) Towards a Green Economy: Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme. Available at http://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/18966/Green_EconomyReport_Final_Dec2011_UNEP.pdf?sequence=1veisAllowed=y (accessed 18 July 2018).Google Scholar
UNFCCC (2020) Greenhouse Gas Inventory Data. Available at https://di.unfccc.int/time_series (accessed 30 January 2020).Google Scholar
Wanyama, FO (2014) Cooperatives and the Sustainable Development Goals: A Contribution to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Geneva: ILO. Available at http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_emp/---emp_ent/---coop/documents/publication/wcms_306072.pdf (accessed 30 August 2018).Google Scholar
World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our Common Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Yeni, O (2019) A sectoral analysis of greenhouse gas emissions and sectoral output growth in turkey. In Wigley, A and Çağatay, S (eds), The Dynamics of Growth in Emerging Economies: The Case of Turkey. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 283–305.Google Scholar
Yılmaz, İ, Akçaöz, H and Özkan, B (2005) An analysis of energy use and input costs for cotton production in Turkey. Renewable Energy 30, 145–155, doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2004.06.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yiğitbaşoğlu, H (2000) Türkiye’de tarım topraklarının kullanımında yapılan başlıca yanlışlıklar ve bunlara bir örnek: Eskişehir. Ankara Üniversitesi Dil ve Tarih-Coğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi 40, 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar