1.I am grateful to the editors of the publications in question for permission to re-use a number of ideas and passages, most often in revised form, earlier articulated in my ‘The Humanities Under Siege?’ in Diogenes 229–230 (58, 1-2), 2012, pp. 136–146, and, to a lesser extent, ‘Minor Literatures and Major Histories,’ in A World History of Literature, Theo D’haen, ed. (Brussels: Koninklijke Vlaamse Akademie van België voor Wetenschappen en Kunsten/Royal Flemish Academy of Belgium, 2012), pp. 101–108.Google Scholar

2.Harvey, D. (1989) The Condition of Postmodernity (Oxford: Blackwell).Google Scholar

3.Lyotard, J.-F. (1979) La condition postmoderne (Paris: Minuit).Google Scholar

4.Wallerstein, I. (1974, 1980, 1989) The Modern World-System I, II, III (London: Academic Press).Google Scholar

5.Todorov, T. (1984) The Conquest of America, Trans. R. Howard (New York: Harper).Google Scholar

6.Habermas, J. ([1985] 1990) Modernity’s consciousness of time and its need for self-reassurance. In: J. Habermas, The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), pp. 1–22; and J. Habermas ([1980] 1992) Modernity – an incomplete project. In: P. Brooker (ed.), Modernism/Postmodernism (London: Longman), pp. 125–38.Google Scholar

7.Said, E. ([1978] 1979) Orientalism (New York: Vintage).Google Scholar

8.Makdisi, S. (1998) Romantic Imperialism: Universal Empire and the Culture of Modernity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), p. 1.Google Scholar

9.Majeed, J. (1992) Ungoverned Imaginings: James Mill’s The History of British India and Orientalism (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10.Suleri, S. (1992) The Rhetoric of English India (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press), p. 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

11.Viswanathan, G. (1988) Masks of Conquest: Literary Study and British Rule in India (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar

12.Said, E. (1983) The World, the Text, and the Critic (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).Google Scholar

13.Ayers, E. L. (2009) Where the humanities live. Daedalus (Winter), pp. 24–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14.The number of students registered in the 12 leading modern languages is rising for each language, but seen over time, the numbers relate a different story: although there is growth in absolute numbers of enrolments in modern languages, because of the phenomenal expansion of students attending institutions of higher learning, in 2006 enrolments in the most taught languages have not reached the proportion they reached in 1960–1965. Since the high of 1960–1965, enrolments in languages have fallen substantially in proportion to the expanding number of students attending institutions of higher education. Thus, describing trends only in terms of increasing enrolments does not convey the magnitude of some of these changes. (Enrollments in Languages Other Than English in United States Institutions of Higher Education, Fall 2006, N. Furman, D. Goldberg, and N. Lusin, Web publication, 13 November 2007, pp. 3–4, http://www.mla.org/pdf/06enrollmentsurvey_final.pdf)Google Scholar

15.Forum, the electronic newsletter (2: 3 June 2002; http://www.hum2.leidenuniv.nl/forum/02_3/discussie/1.htm) of the Faculty of Arts of Leiden University, in an article entitled ‘Falen de curricula modern talen?’ (‘Are modern language studies falling short?’), lists the reduction of incoming first-year students as follows for the period 1992 to 2001: Spanish 70%, French 68%, Slavics 68%, German 61%, Romance 49%, Italian 47%, Dutch 41%, English 39%; all Dutch Faculties of Arts lost 34.6% in student numbers. The figures for the major Dutch universities look as follows: Utrecht 51%, UvA 50%, Leiden 37.5%, Groningen 28%, Nijmegen 20.5%.Google Scholar

16.The financial crisis of 2008 made its consequences painfully evident in the 2008–2009 MLA Job Information List (JIL). After trending upward between 2003–2004 and 2007–2008, the number of jobs advertised in the JIL in 2008–2009 declined since 2007–2008 by 446 (24.4%) in English and 453 (27.0%) in foreign languages. In the English edition 1202 ads announced 1380 jobs; in the foreign language edition 1106 ads announced 1227 jobs (ads that departments later marked ‘search cancelled’ have been excluded from these counts). In both numerical and percentage terms, this year’s declines mark the largest single-year decreases in the 34-year history of the JIL counts. (Report on the MLA Job Information List, 2008–2009, MLA Office of Research, Web publication, 25 September 2009, p. 1, http://www.mla.org/pdf/jil_report200809.pdf)Google Scholar

17.The MLA/ADE report Demography of the Faculty: A Statistical Portrait of English and Foreign Languages, D. Laurence, Web publication, 10 December 2008, p. 1, states that ‘The percentage figures show a dramatic ten-percentage-point decline in the share of the faculty represented by tenured and tenure-track appointments. The numbers tell us that, across higher education considered as a whole, the percentage drop in tenured and tenure-track appointments occurred because of increases in the non-tenure-track categories rather than cuts in the absolute number of tenured or tenure-track positions. (The IPEDS data, of course, tell us nothing about transfers of lines between disciplines, and an aggregate summary masks the varying circumstances of specific institutions or sectors.) The ADE report on the academic workforce also calls attention to the continuing increases in student enrolments since 1975 and particularly from 1995 to 2005. As student enrolments grow, the part of the faculty teaching off the tenure track grows a lot, while the tenured and tenure-track faculty ranks stay roughly the same size. The tenured faculty becomes diminished in the institution by being overwhelmed rather than by being cut.’Google Scholar

18.https://aeon.co/essays/the-humanities-are-booming-only-the-professors-can-t-see-it.Google Scholar

19.Zuckerman, H. and Ehrenberg, R. G. (2009) Recent trends in funding for the academic humanities & their implications. Daedalus (Winter), pp. 124–146. With the ‘academic humanities’ Zuckermand and Ehrenberg mean ‘“all fields of study normally grouped together ... that are identified as departments and programs in humanities, and in which the Ph.D. is the highest earned degree.” They also include history (sometimes classified with the social sciences) and aspects of anthropology, ethnology, and archaeology’ (p. 124). In another article in the same Daedalus issue E.L. Ayers defines the humanities as ‘generally considered to include English language and literature; foreign languages and literatures; history; philosophy; religion; ethnic, gender, and cultural studies; area and interdisciplinary studies; archaeology; art history; the history of music; and the study of drama and cinema. Some parts of political science, government, geography, anthropology, and sociology – the “humanistic social sciences” – are more closely identified with the humanities than with other more quantitative aspects of the disciplines.’Google Scholar

20.D’Arms, J. (1997) Funding trends in the academic humanities. reflections on the stability of the system. In: A. Kernan (ed.), What’s Happened to the Humanities? (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

21.http://www.ku.edu.tr/ku/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2080&Itemid=2973.Google Scholar

22.Harpham, G. G. (2005) Beneath and beyond the ‘crisis in the humanities’. New Literary History, 36, p. 35.Google Scholar

23.Randel, D. M. (2009) The public good: knowledge as the foundation for a democratic society. Daedalus (Winter), pp. 8–12.Google Scholar

24.Eckermann, J. P. ([1836, 1848, 1955] 1987) Gespräche mit Goethe in den letzten Jahren seines Lebens. Herausgegeben von Fritz Bergemann (Frankfurt am Main und Leipzig: Insel Verlag).Google Scholar

25.Strich, F. (1949) Goethe and World Literature. Transl. C. A. M. Sym (New York: Hafner Publishing Company), p. 16.Google Scholar

26.Moulton, R. ([1911] 1921) World Literature and its Place in General Culture (New York: Macmillan).Google Scholar

27.Lawall, S. (2004) Anthologizing ‘world literature’. In: J.R. Di Leo (ed.), On Anthologies: Politics and Pedagogy (Lincoln and London: University of Nebraska Press), pp. 59–60.Google Scholar

28.Buck, P. M. Jr (ed.) (1934) An Anthology of World Literature (New York: Macmillan), p. v.Google Scholar

29.Guérard, A. (1940) Preface to World Literature (New York: Henry Holt and Company), p. 34.Google Scholar

30.Friederich, W. P. (1960) On the integrity of our planning. In: H.M. Block (ed.), The Teaching of World Literature, UNC Studies in Comparative Literature 28 (Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press), pp. 14–15.Google Scholar

31.Etiemble, R. ([1964, 1966] 1975) Faut-il réviser la notion de Weltliteratur? Essais de littérature (vraiment) générale (Paris: Gallimard), p. 22.Google Scholar

32.Shih, S.-M. (2004) Global literature and technologies of recognition. PMLA, 1, pp. 16–30.Google Scholar

33.Moretti, F. (2000) Conjectures on world literature. New Left Review, 1, pp. 54–68.Google Scholar

34.Casanova, P. (1999) La République mondiale des lettres (Paris: Seuil); also as The World Republic of Letters. Transl. M. DeBevoise (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004).Google Scholar

35.Damrosch, D. (2003) What Is World Literature? (Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

36.Said, E. (2004) Humanism and Democratic Criticism (New York: Columbia University Press).Google Scholar

37.Apter, E. (2006) The Translation Zone: A New Comparative Literature (Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar

38.Spivak, G. (2003) Death of a Discipline (New York: Columbia University Press), p. 39.Google Scholar

39.Arac, J. (2002) Anglo-globalism? New Left Review, 16(July-August), pp. 35–45.Google Scholar

40.Wang, N. (2010) World literature and the dynamic function of translation. Modern Language Quarterly, 71(1), 2–14.Google Scholar

41.Wang, N. (2010) Global English(es) and global Chinese(s): toward rewriting a new literary history in Chinese. Journal of Contemporary China, 19(63), p. 170.Google Scholar

42.Chow, R. (2004) The old/new question of comparison in literary studies: a post-European perspective. ELH, 71(2), p. 307.Google Scholar

43.Gunder Frank, A. (1998) Re-Orient: Global Economy in the Asian Age (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press).Google Scholar