Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:13:54.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two fin de siècles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2009

H. L. Wesseling
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Is the end of the 20th century comparable with the end of the 19th century, the so-called fin de siècle? To what extent are the cultural characterizations of that decade—for fin de siècle is first and foremost a cultural concept—applicable to our days? The answer to this question is not easy to give because there are similarities as well as dissimilarities. The central preoccupation of the fin de siècle however was the feeling of decadence, the idea that European civilization was past its prime and on to the end. This notion is not a characteristic of the present day's cultural climate and therefore there exists a fundamental difference between the two periods.

Type
FOCUS—Two Fin de Siècles
Information
European Review , Volume 2 , Issue 3 , July 1994 , pp. 213 - 220
Copyright
Copyright © Academia Europaea 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Grand-Carteret, J. (1893) XIXe siècle. Paris, 753.Google Scholar
2.Jackson, H. (1950) The Eighteenth-nineties. A Review of Art and Ideas at the Close of the Nineteenth Century. Harmondsworth, 20.Google Scholar
3.Weber, E. (1986) France, Fin de siècle. Cambridge, MA, 9.Google Scholar
4.Grand-Carteret, J. (1893) XIXe siècle, 754.Google Scholar
5.Janik, A. and Toulmin, S. (1973) Wittgenstein's Vienna, New York.Google Scholar
6.Schorske, C.Fin de siècle Vienna, Politics and Culture. New YorkGoogle Scholar
7.Clair, J. (ed) (1986) Vienne, 1880–1938, L'Apocalypse joyeuse. Paris.Google Scholar
8.Dimnet, E. (1914) France herself again. London.Google Scholar
9.Praz, M. (1914) The Romantic Agony. London.Google Scholar
10.Langbehn, J. (1840) Rembrandt als Erzieher.Google Scholar
11.Meyrink, G. (1916) Das grüne Gesicht. Berlin.Google Scholar
12.Nordau, M. (1893) Entartung. Berlin.Google Scholar
13.Davidson, J. (1845) Earl Lavender. London, 73.Google Scholar
14.Wilde, O. (1965) The Picture of Dorian Gray in: Complete Works London: Springer Books, 477.Google Scholar
15.Jackson, H. (1950) Eighteen-nineties, 14.Google Scholar
16.Flaubert, G. (1917) Correspondance, 4e Série, 1869–80 Paris, 34.Google Scholar
17.Taine, H. (1875–1893) Les Origines de la France contemporaine. Paris.Google Scholar
18.Renan, E. (1871) La Réforme intellectuelle et morale de la France. Paris.Google Scholar
19. Cf. Wesseling, H. L. (1969) Soldaat en krijger, Franse opvattingen over leger en oorlog, Assen.Google Scholar
20. Cited in Chastenet, J. (1955) Histoire de la Troisième République, III. Paris, 27.Google Scholar
21.Swart, K. W. 1964 The Sense of Decadence in Nineteenth-century France. The Hague, 188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Romein, J. (1967) Op het breukvlak van twee eeuwen (Amsterdam 1967). English translation (1978) The Watershed of two Eras, Europe in 1900. Middletown, CT.Google Scholar
23.Barraclough, G. (1966) An Introduction to Contemporary History. London.Google Scholar
24.Romein, J. (1954) Aera van Europa. Leiden.Google Scholar
25.Romein, J. (1958) De eeuw van Azië. Leiden.Google Scholar