Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T06:00:09.422Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Time to Rethink the Concepts of Knowledge Dissemination and Transfer in the Educational System? A Systems Theoretical Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2012

Helle Mathiasen
Helle Mathiasen
Affiliation:
Department of Information and Media Studies, Aarhus University, Helsingforsgade 14, DK-8200 Aarhus, Denmark. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper is intended as an invitation to continue reflecting on and discussing the concepts of learning and teaching, including the concept of educational environment and the conditions for knowledge construction in that environment. The key concept is communication, which I link to different environments, including face-to-face (f2f) environments, net-mediated environments and various mixtures of these types of communication environments. Furthermore, I implicate learning resources in the concept of the educational environment. Thus, the main purpose of this paper is to contribute to developing our approach to the nexus between teaching and learning, including the concept of environment and the conditions for knowledge construction. I present a case study, which I analyse using a systems theoretical analytical framework, in order to discuss the relation between learning and the environment, including the idea of the possibility of knowledge transfer and knowledge dissemination. The specific focus is on learning resources in specific programs-on-demand (podcasts) and video-on-demand (vodcasts, from now just podcast) – and the students’ approaches to these learning resources and the environment offered. My point of departure is to contribute to scholarly discussion of learning resources and, in particular, of the use of podcasts and students’ approaches to these learning resources in concrete educational contexts. Finally, I suggest that we take the opportunity to reflect on the challenging task: how can we organize teaching and environments for learning, including the choice of learning resources, in order to provide each student with the possibility of developing the concrete educational qualifications that are required?

Type
Focus: Knowledge Management in Contemporary Europe
Information
European Review , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , 30 March 2012 , pp. 153 - 163
Copyright
Copyright © Academia Europaea 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Johnson, L. et al. (2008) Pod-casting and VOD-casting as reusable learning objects. Paper presented at The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.Google Scholar
2.Malan, D.J. (2007) Podcasting computer science E-1. In Proceedings of 38th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Mathiasen, H. (2004) Expectations of technology: When the intensive application of IT in teaching becomes a possibility. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(3), 273–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Mathiasen, H. (2007). Teaching and learning in a variety of communication forums. Paper presented at iPED Conference 2007, Coventry University Technocenter, UK.Google Scholar
5.McKenney, S. (2005) Technology for curriculum and teacher development: Software to help educators learn while designing teacher guides. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(2), 167–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Means, B. and Haertel, G.D. (Eds) (2004). Using Technology Evaluation to Enhance Student Learning (New York: Teachers College Press).Google Scholar
7.Mehrotra, C.M., Hollister, C.D. and McGahey, L. (2001) Distance Learning: Principles for Effective Design, Delivery, and Evaluation (London: Sage).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Molina, P.G. (2006) Pioneering new territory and technologies. EDUCAUSE, Review, 41(5).Google Scholar
9.Naidu, S., Barret, J. and Olson, P. (2000) Improving instructional effectiveness with computer-mediated communication. In D. Squires, G. Conole and G. Jacobs (eds) The Changing Face of Learning Technology (Cardiff, Wales: University of Wales Press), pp. 112–125.Google Scholar
10.Norris, C., Sullivan, T., Poirot, J. and Solloway, E. (2003) No access, no use, no impact: snapshot surveys of educational technology in K-12. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(1), 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Olgren, C.H. (1998) Improving learning outcomes: the effects of learning strategies and motivation. In C.C. Gibson (ed.) Distance Learners in Higher Education (Madison: Atwood Publishing), pp. 77–95.Google Scholar
12.Solomon, G. and Schrum, L. (2007) New Tools, New Schools: Getting Started with Web 2.0 (Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education).Google Scholar
13.M.H. Stenalt and D.S. Jørgensen (2007) Using E-tivities, video dialogues and informal communication to motivate university teachers online. In: Proceeding of the 13th International Conference of European University Information Systems, EUNIS 2007 (Grenoble Universities, France).Google Scholar
14.Luhmann, N. (1995) Social Systems (Stanford: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
15.Luhmann, N. (1986) Systeme Verstehen Systeme. In N. Luhmann et al. (eds) Zwischen Intransparanz und Verstehen – fragen an die Pädagogik (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag), p. 9.Google Scholar
16.Mathiasen, H. (2008) HYPERLINK “http://person.au.dk/da/pub/11805009?id=6802” Is there a nexus between learning and teaching? In C. Holtham and C. Nygaard (eds) Understanding Learning-Centred Higher Education (Denmark: Copenhagen Business School Press).Google Scholar
17.Luhmann, N. (1998) Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag).Google Scholar
18.Luhmann, N. (1985) Complexity and meaning. In The Science and Praxis of Complexity (Japan: The United Nations University).Google Scholar
19.Luhmann, N. (2002) Das Erziehungssystem der Gesellschaft (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp).Google Scholar
20.Foerster, H.v. andPörksen, B. (2006) Wahrheit ist die Erfindung eines Lügners. Gespräche für Skeptiker (Heidelberg: Carl-Auer Verlag).Google Scholar
21.Luhmann, N. (1992) What is communication. Forum, Communication Theory, 2(3), 251–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Shannon, E.C. and Weaver, W. ([1949] 1971) The Mathematical Theory of Communication (Urbana, Chicago, London: University of Illinois Press).Google Scholar
23.Mathiasen, H. (2010) Podcast Experiences – A Case-based Consecutive Research Project, EdITLib.org, Education & Information Technology Digital Library. ACCE.Google Scholar
24.Mathiasen, H. (2006) A consecutive research design inspired by system theory. The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Conference, San Francisco, USA.Google Scholar
25.Coulon, A. (1995) Ethnomethodology (Thousand Oaks: Sage).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.OECD (2006) Personalising Education (Paris: OECD/CERI).Google Scholar
27.Patton, Q.M. (1990) Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods (London: Sage).Google Scholar