Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T12:35:03.661Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Postmodernity and postcommunism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2009

Mihály Szegedy-Maszák
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Generalizing between postmodernity and postmodernism is of doubtful value. The shift from communism to postcommunism has led to a decline, or different significance, of postmodernism in Eastern Europe.

Type
Mini-Focus: Postmodernism
Information
European Review , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , February 1998 , pp. 53 - 62
Copyright
Copyright © Academia Europaea 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Polyphony (1993) Soros Center of Contemporary Arts, Budapest, 294.Google Scholar
2. See Szegedy-Maszák, Zoltán (1997) http://.c3.hu/cryptogram. Magyar Mûhely 102 (Spring 1997), 58–60.Google Scholar
3.Jameson, F. (1991) Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism (London and New York: verso).Google Scholar
4.Kosuth, J. (1991) Art after Philosophy and After: Collected Writings, 1966–1990 (Cambridge, MA: MIT), 118, 154, 70.Google Scholar
5.Biennale de Venezia, XLV, Espozitione Internazionale d'Arte Padiglinone d'Ungheria 1993, 105.Google Scholar
6.Lukács, G. (1981) Die Eigenart des Aesthetischen, vol. I (Berlin und Weimar: Aufbau), 779.Google Scholar
7.Suleiman, S. R. (1997) The politics of postmodernism after the wall. In Bertens, H. and Fokkema, D. (eds) International Postmodernism: Theory and Literary Practice (Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins), 54.Google Scholar
8.Eagleton, T. (1997) The contradictions of postmodernism. New Literary History 28, 6.Google Scholar
9.Bertens, H. (1997) The debate on postmodernism. In H. Bertens and D. Fokkema, International Postmodernism: Theory and Literary Practice (Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins), p. 11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Danto, A. C. (1987) The State of Art (New York: Prentice Hall), 192.Google Scholar
11.James, H. (1967) Hawthorne (London: Macmillan), 23.Google Scholar
12.Danto, A. C. (1997) After the End of Art: Contemporary and the Pale of History (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press), 49.Google Scholar
13.Jauß, H. R. (1994) Wege des Verstehens (München: Wilhelm Fink), 329.Google Scholar
14.Fokkema, D. (1997) The semantics of literary postmodernism. In Bertens, H. and Fokkema, D. (eds) International Postmodernism: Theory and Literary Practice (Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins), p. 28.Google Scholar
15.Ortega, J. (1997) Postmodernism in Spanish-American writing.In Bertens, H. and Fokkema, D. (eds) International Postmodernism: Theory and Literary Practice (Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins), p. 315.Google Scholar
16.Danto, A. C. (1986) The Philosophical Disenfranchisement of Art (New York: Columbia University Press), p. xv.Google Scholar
17.Jauß, H. R. (1989) Studien zum Epochenwandel der aesthetischen Moderne (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp), 276.Google Scholar
18.Danto, A. C. (1992) Beyond the Brillo Box in Post-Historical Perspective (New York: Farrar, Straus, Giroux), 123.Google Scholar
19.Hutcheon, L. (1988) A Poetics of Postmodernism: History, Theory, Fiction (New York and London: Routledge), p. 44.Google Scholar
20.Lu, S. Hsiao-peng (1997) Art, culture, and cultural criticism in post-new China. New Literary History 28, 119.Google Scholar
21.Szili, J. (1997) Barnás Ferenc: Az élősködő (A testiség eszkhatológiája). Kalligram, 09, 59–87.Google Scholar
22.Gadamer, H. G. (1986) Wahrheit und Methode (Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr), 478.Google Scholar