Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T18:37:06.946Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Organizing of Scientific Fields: The Case of Corpus Linguistics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2016

Lars Engwall  and
Tina Hedmo
Lars Engwall
Affiliation:
Department of Business Studies, Box 513, Uppsala University, Sweden. E-mail: [email protected]
Tina Hedmo
Affiliation:
Department of Business Studies, Box 513, Uppsala University, Sweden. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper focuses on the processes through which scientific fields are organized over time. It is argued that new approaches in scientific work are hampered by authority structures within national systems for research and established approaches within disciplines, but that these obstacles can be overcome by means of external funding, particularly through new funding sources, as well as the international developments of an innovation. As far as the latter are concerned, they are expected to first lead to informal collaboration among scholars. In the passage of time this informal collaboration becomes more and more formalized. In order to analyse such processes the paper presents a model with three phases labelled as creating, gathering and communicating. This model is then used in an empirical study of corpus linguistics, i.e. the systematic analysis of well-defined populations of written and/or spoken language material. It is shown in the paper how corpus linguistics was developed by scientific innovators who were initially questioned. With the passage of time they created a number of international organizations, which have eventually become more and more formalized, many of them publishing their own journals. In this way the paper demonstrates the significance of organizing for the development of scientific fields.

Type
Scientific Fields
Information
European Review , Volume 24 , Issue 4 , October 2016 , pp. 568 - 591
Copyright
© Academia Europaea 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References and Notes

1. Whitley, R. (1984) The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
2. Engwall, L., Aljets, E., Hedmo, T. and Ramuz, R. (2014) Computer corpus linguistics: An innovation in the humanities. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 42, pp. 329–363.Google Scholar
3. Kaeding, F.W. (1897-1898) Häufigkeitswörterbuch der deutschen Sprache 1-2 (Steiglitz bei Berlin: Selbstverlag des Herausgebers).Google Scholar
4. Henmon, V.A.C. (1924) A French word book based on a count of 400 000 running words Bureau of Educational Research Bulletins 3 (Madison: University of Wisconsin).Google Scholar
5. Vander Beke, G.E. (1929) French Word Book. Publications of the American and Canadian Committees on Modern Languages 15 (New York: Macmillan).Google Scholar
6. Buchanan, M.A. (1931) A Graded Spanish Word Book. Publications of the American and Canadian Committees on Modern Languages 3 (Toronto: University of Toronto Press).Google Scholar
7. Cheydleur, F.D. (1934) French Idiom List Based on a Count of 1,183,000 Running Words. Publications of the American and Canadian Committees on Modern Languages 16 (New York: Macmillan).Google Scholar
8. Morgan, B.Q. (1933) German Frequency Word Book, based on Kaeding’s Häufigkeitswörterbuch der deutschen Sprache. Arranged and edited by B.Q. Morgan. Publications of the American and Canadian Committees on Modern Languages 9 (New York: Macmillan).Google Scholar
9. See, for example, Busa, R. (1951) Sancti Thomae Aquinatis hymnorum ritualium varia specimina concordantiarum: Primo saggio di indici di parole automaticamente composti e stampati. Archivum philosophicum Aloisianum Ser, 2; 7. Milan.Google Scholar
10. See, Johansson, S. (2008) Some aspects of the development of corpus linguistics in the 1970s and 1980s. In: A. Lüdeling and M. Kytö (eds), Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook (Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter), pp. 33–53.Google Scholar
11. Quemada, B. (ed.) (1959-1993) Matériaux pour l’histoire du vocabulaire français: datations et documents lexicographiques, Part 1-30 (Besançon: Centre d'étude du vocabulaire français).Google Scholar
12. Cf. for example, Muller, C. (1967) Étude de statistique lexicale: le vocabulaire du théâtre de Pierre Corneille. Paris: Larousse (Diss. Université de Strasbourg); C. Muller (1968) Initiation à la statistique linguistique (Paris: Larousse); C. Muller (1979) Langue française et linguistique quantitative: recueil d’articles (Geneva: Slatkine). For Muller’s last Festschrift, in celebration of his centenary, see C. Delcourt and M. Hug (eds) (2009) Mélanges offerts à Charles Muller pour son centième anniversaire (22 septembre 2009) (Paris: CILF).Google Scholar
13. Juilland, A. and Chang-Rodriguez, E. (1964) Frequency Dictionary of Spanish Words. The Romance Languages and their Structures. First series, S 1 (The Hague: Mouton).Google Scholar
14. Juilland, A., Edwards, P.M.H and Juilland, I. (1965) Frequency Dictionary of Rumanian Words, The Romance Languages and their Structures. First series, R1 (The Hague: Mouton).Google Scholar
15. Juilland, A., Brodin, D. and Davidovitch, C. (1970) Frequency Dictionary of French Words. The Romance Languages and their Structures. First series, F1 (The Hague: Mouton).Google Scholar
16. Juilland, A., Traversa, V.P. and Beltramo, A. (1973) Frequency Dictionary of Italian Words. The Romance Languages and their Structures. First series, I1 (The Hague: Mouton).Google Scholar
17. Quirk, R. and Svartvik, J. (1978) A Corpus of Modern English (Lund: Lund University).Google Scholar
18. Kuçera, H. and Francis, N. (1967) Computational Analysis of Present-day American English (Providence, RI: Providence University Press).Google Scholar
19. Allén, S. (1970-1980) Nusvensk frekvensordbok baserad på tidningstext: Frequency Dictionary of Present-day Swedish based on Newspaper Material. Data linguistica 1-4 (Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International).Google Scholar
20. Berg, S. (1978) Olika lika ord: svenskt homograflexikon (On Different Words: Swedish dictionary of homographs), Data linguistica 12 (Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International).Google Scholar
21. Allén, S., Abelin, Å. and Others (1986) Svensk ordbok (Swedish Dictionary) (Solna: Esselte Studium).Google Scholar
22.Already in 1962 Allén had presented a concordance of a 17th century text. Ten years later, in 1972, he was appointed to a chair in computational linguistics, which is considered to have been the first of its kind worldwide. (Interview by Lars Engwall with Sture Allén, 17 November 2011).Google Scholar
23. Chomsky, N.A. (1957) Syntactic Structures (New York: Mouton).Google Scholar
24. Chomsky, N.A. (1965) Aspects of the Theory of Syntax (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).Google Scholar
25. Filmore, C. (1992) ‘Corpus linguistics’ or ‘computer-aided armchair linguistics’. In Directions in Corpus Linguistics. Proceedings of Nobel Symposium 82, Stockholm, 4–8 August 1991, ed. Jan Svartvik. (Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter), pp. 35–60, p. 35.Google Scholar
26. Svartvik, J. (2007) Corpus linguistics 25+ years on. In: R. Fachinetti, (ed.), Corpus Linguistics 25 Years On (Amsterdam: Editions Rodopi), pp. 11–25, p. 11.Google Scholar
27. Francis, N. (1984) Dinner speech. ICAME News 10: 5–7.Google Scholar
28.Interview by Lars Engwall with Sture Allén, 17 November 2011.Google Scholar
29.In 1997 a North American Chapter (NAACL) including members from Central and South America was created.Google Scholar
30. Liberman, M. (1989) Text on tap: the ACL/DCI, speech and natural language: Proceedings of a workshop held at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 21–23 February 1989, H89-2024 (http://acl.ldc.upenn.edu/H/H89/H89-2024.pdf).Google Scholar
31.Hays was the founding chairman of the then newly formed linguistics department at the State University of New York at Buffalo and professor of linguistics, computer science, information and library studies.Google Scholar
32.In addition COLING describes itself as follows: ‘COLING has always been distinguished by pleasant venues and atmosphere, rather than by the clinical efficiency of an airport conference hotel: COLINGs are simply nice conferences to be at. They have also striven for inclusiveness, both geographical, when the world was more harshly divided than it is now, and theoretical, in that COLING has been less prone to mood swings of theory than societies that are run in different, and more conventional, ways’ (http://nlp.shef.ac.uk/iccl/nature.html).Google Scholar
33. McEnery, T. and Hardie, A. (2012) Corpus Linguistics. Method, Theory and Practice (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
34. Leech, G. and Johansson, S. (2009) The coming of ICAME. ICAME Journal, 33, pp. 5–11.Google Scholar
35.According to Geoffrey Leech, the main reason for the formalisation of ICAME was to solve copyright problems with the LOB corpus (Interview by Lars Engwall with Geoffrey Leech, 9 May 2013).Google Scholar
36. Johansson, S. (2009) The early history of ICAME. ICAME Journal, 33, pp. 12–20.Google Scholar
37. Hockey, S. (2004) The history of humanities computing. In: S. Schreibman, R. Siemens and J. Unsworth (eds), A Companion to Digital Humanities (Oxford: Blackwell), Chapter 1.Google Scholar
38. Eliasson, S. (2010) The Nordic Association of Linguists: The preparatory phase and the first thirty years (1977–2006). In: H. Götzsche, (ed.) Memory, Mind and Language (Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing). 4–54.Google Scholar
39.An even earlier effort in Scandinavia was Svenskans beskrivning, which grew out of a conference at Stockholm University in 1963 focusing on phonetics, albeit with a light touch of structuralism. Since then conferences have been arranged approximately every 18 months with increasingly standardized proceedings. These Nordic developments were also stimulated by summer schools from the 1960s and onwards. In addition, numerous additional Nordic conferences were started during this period, such as the Nordic Conference on Computational Linguistics (NODALIDA) starting in Gothenburg in 1977. See E. Hovdhaugen, F. Karlsson, C. Henriksenl and B. Sigurd (2000) The History of Linguistics in the Nordic Countries (Helsinki: Societas Scientiarum Fennica); F. Karlsson (2008) Svenskans beskrivning 1-29. In: C. Falk, A. Nord and R. Palm (eds), Svenskans beskrivning 30 (Stockholms Universitet: Institutionen för nordiska språk).Google Scholar
40.The first President was Joe Raben at Queens College, City University of New York, who was followed by other US professors until 2004. That year a European, Lorna Hughes from the University of Wales, was elected President. However, as she stepped down at the end of 2007 she was succeeded by US scholars, first Julia Flanders from Brown, and then by Bethany Nowviskie from the University of Virginia.Google Scholar
41. Church, K.W. and Mercer, R.L. (1993) Introduction to the special issue on computational linguistics using large corpora. Computational Linguistics, 19, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
42.Since 1999, conferences have been arranged about every 18 months by the American Association of Corpus Linguists (AACL). However as pointed out to Merja Kytö by Randi Reppen, who organized the 2014 conference in Flagstaff, AACL ‘is not really an organization’ (Personal communicationo).Google Scholar
43. Brunsson, N. and Ahrne, G. (2008) Meta-organizations (Cheltenham: Edgar Elgar).Google Scholar
44. McCarty, W. (1992) HUMANIST: Lessons from a global electronic seminar. Computers and the Humanities, 26, pp. 205–222.Google Scholar
45. Meyer, C.F. (2002) English Corpus Linguistics: An Introduction (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
46. Halliday, M.A.K. (2004) Lexicology and Corpus Linguistics: An Introduction (London: Continuum).Google Scholar
47. Teubert, W. and Čermáková, A. (2007) Corpus Linguistics: A Short Introduction (London: Continuum).Google Scholar
48. Lüdeling, A. and Kytö, M. (eds) (2008-2009) Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook, Vols 1-2 (Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter).Google Scholar
49. O’Keeffe, A. and McCarthy, M. (eds) (2010) The Routledge Handbook of Corpus Linguistics (Abingdon: Routledge).Google Scholar
50. Engwall, L. (2009) Mercury meets Minerva (Stockholm: the Economic Research Institute of the Stockholm School of Economics) (Extended second edition of Mercury Meets Minerva, Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1992).Google Scholar
51.Through an initiative of the publisher De Gruyter the journal Organization Studies was launched as early as 1975 (http://www.egosnet.org/egos/about_egos/egos_history_short_overview).Google Scholar

Electronic Sources and Web-pages (accessed in May 2012)

http://aclweb.org/anthology-new/H/H92/H92-1114.pdf Google Scholar
http://digitalhumanities.org Google Scholar
http://icame.uib.no/ Google Scholar
http://icame.uib.no/archives/No_17_ICAME_Journal_index.pdf Google Scholar
http://icame.uib.no/journal.html Google Scholar
http://ijl.oxfordjournals.org/ Google Scholar
http://khnt.hit.uib.no/icame/manuals/lob/index.htm Google Scholar
http://nlp.shef.ac.uk/iccl/ Google Scholar
http://sdh-semi.org Google Scholar
http://spraakbanken.gu.se/ Google Scholar
http://www.ach.org Google Scholar
http://www.aclweb.org Google Scholar
http://www.allc.org/ Google Scholar
http://www.digitalhumanities.org/humanist/McCarty__Report_on_Humanist_2008-abbreviated.pdf Google Scholar
http://www.eamt.org Google Scholar
http://www.egosnet.org/egos/about_egos/egos_history_short_overview, 2012-05-31 Google Scholar
http://www.elsnet.org/resources/eciCorpus.html Google Scholar
http://www.euralex.org Google Scholar
http://www.iamt.org Google Scholar
http://www.ldc.upenn.edu Google Scholar
http://www.linguistlist.org Google Scholar
http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/cral/index.aspx Google Scholar
http://www.mt-archive.info/LREC-2004-Zampolli.pdf Google Scholar
http://www.uef.fi/nal Google Scholar
https://online.ldc.upenn.edu/login.html Google Scholar