Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:17:34.577Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Medicine Reading Literature: the Paradigm of Degeneration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2013

Lena Arampatzidou*
Affiliation:
Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, University Campus, TK 54124, Thessaloniki, Greece. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

This article is part of a larger project on the interaction between Natural/Life Sciences and Literature, and is a first attempt to scout the area through concentrating on Degeneration, a book that sees Literature through the eyes of Medicine. Max Nordau, the author of the book, was a turn-of-the-twentieth-century German physician who read contemporary movements in Art and Literature as Disease. He was an adversary of pre-modernist and modernist movements such as aestheticism, decadence, impressionism, and so on, and failed to recognize their avant-garde character. The article examines how Nordau reads certain features of literary texts and works of art which he cannot understand as symptoms of the malfunctioning of the nervous system of the painters and writers concerned. Moving from the body of the text to the body of the artist, Nordau reads particular artistic features as signs of bodily disease of the artists, and he does so by opposing the rationalist discourse of Medicine to the figurative language of Literature.

Type
Focus: Art
Copyright
Copyright © Academia Europaea 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

1.Nordau, M. (1993) Degeneration, G. Mosse (transl.) (Lincoln & London: University of Nebraska Press), p. 9.Google Scholar
2.Foster, M.P. (1954) The Reception of Max Nordau's Degeneration in England and America (University of Michigan: PhD diss.), p. 317. In: P.M. Baldwin (1980) Liberalism, nationalism and degeneration: the case of Max Nordau. Central European History, 13(2), p. 104.Google Scholar
3.Baldwin, P.M. (1980) Liberalism, nationalism and degeneration: the case of Max Nordau. Central European History, 13(2), p. 106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Nordau, M. (1895) Degeneration and evolution 1. A reply to my critics. The North American Review, 161(464), p. 89.Google Scholar
5.Foucault, M. (1982) The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), p. 777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Hyder, C. (ed.) (1970) Swinburne. The Critical Heritage (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul), p. xiii: ‘Carlyle, for instance, had described men of letters as having a mission comparable to that of priests’.Google Scholar

Further Reading

Baldwin, P.M. (1980) Liberalism, nationalism and degeneration: the case of Max Nordau. Central European History, 13(2), pp. 99120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foster, M.P. (1954) The Reception of Max Nordau's Degeneration in England and America (University of Michigan: PhD diss.).Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1982) The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), pp. 777795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyder, C. (ed.) (1970) Swinburne. The Critical Heritage (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
Nordau, M. (1993) Degeneration, G. Mosse (transl.) (Lincoln & London: University of Nebraska Press).Google Scholar
Nordau, M. (1895) Degeneration and evolution 1. A reply to my critics. The North American Review, 161(464), pp. 8093.Google Scholar