Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T19:55:29.465Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Luxurious Laughter. Wasteful Economy in Ben Jonson’s Comedy Volpone, or the Fox (1606)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2016

Jakob Ladegaard*
Affiliation:
School of Communication and Culture, Aarhus University, Langelandsgade 139, Building 1580/318, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

In the 16th and 17th centuries, London became an international centre of commerce. The trade in exotic luxury goods played a significant part in this process. In contemporary society, the taste for luxury and the economic, social and cultural changes it embodied were viewed with both fascination and distrust. The new shopping centres where luxury goods were on display were thus accused of corrupting public morality and damaging national trade. The public debate about luxury was in part conducted on the stage of the commercial Elizabethan theatre, especially in the new genre of so-called city comedies that portrayed, parodied and criticized social life in the expanding city. Ben Jonson was a master of this genre and his most famous comedy, Volpone or the Fox (1606), dealt with the contested issue of luxury. In contrast to many previous readings that have interpreted the play in terms derived from later liberal and Marxist economic thinking, this article analyses the theme of luxury in relation to contemporary economic and moral debates. I will argue that the play depicts the main character Volpone’s taste for luxury and the way he acquires it as both morally and economically damaging for an economy such as the English one, which at the time was built on personal debt and credit and therefore heavily reliant on credibility and reciprocal social obligations. However, this lesson is complicated by the fact that Volpone itself was in fact part of the economic relations Jonson criticized, since it was a commodity – and, in the eyes of many contemporaries, indeed a luxury commodity – on London’s thriving theatre market. I argue that Jonson is aware of this contradiction without being able to resolve it. Ultimately, then, Volpone is an ambivalent comedy intended to provoke reflection in the audience about their consumption of spectacular luxury both inside and outside the theatre.

Type
Erasmus Lecture 2014
Copyright
© Academia Europaea 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References and Notes

1.Jonson, B. (1999) The Entertainment at Britain’s Burse. In: M. Butler (ed.), Re-Presenting Ben Jonson – Text, History, Performance (London: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 132151, esp. p. 132.Google Scholar
2.All references are to B. Jonson (2001) Volpone or the Fox. In: R. Harp (ed.), Ben Jonson’s Plays and Masques (New York & London: W.W. Norton), pp. 3–110.Google Scholar
3.For a compelling interpretation of Jonson’s entertainment with a focus on luxury, see A. V. Scott (2006) Marketing luxury at the new exchange – Jonson’s Entertainment at Britain’s Burse and the rhetoric of wonder. Early Modern Literary Studies, 12(2), pp. 119. Web: http://purl.oclc.org/emls/12-2/scotluxu.htmGoogle Scholar
4.Eisaman Maus, K. (2005) Idol and gift in Volpone. English Literary Renaissance, 35(3), pp. 429453, esp. pp. 431-435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Berry, C.J. (1994) The Idea of Luxury – A Conceptual and Historical Investigation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 9798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Baer, W. C. (2007) Early retailing – London’s shopping exchanges, 1550–1700. Business History, 49(1), pp. 2951, esp. pp. 43–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.McPherson, D. C. (1990) Shakespeare, Jonson and the Myth of Venice (Newark: University of Delaware Press), pp. 9495.Google Scholar
8.Wayne, D. E. (1982) Drama and society in the age of Jonson: ‘An alternative view’. Renaissance Drama, 13, pp. 103129, esp. p. 105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Greenblatt, S. J. (1976) The false ending in ‘Volpone’. The Journal of English and Germanic Philology, 75(1-2), pp. 90104, esp. p. 96.Google Scholar
10.Muldrew, C. (2001) ’Hard food for Midas’ – cash and its social value in early modern England. Past & Present, 170, pp. 78120, esp. p. 84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Scott, A. V. (2008) Censuring indulgence – Volpone’s ‘use of riches’ and the problem of luxury. AUMLA, 110, pp. 115, esp. p. 7. Reference is to Pliny (1938-63) Natural History (trans. H. Rackham) (London: William Heineman), p. 9.53.Google Scholar
12.See also: Harris, J. G. (2004) Sick Economies – Drama, Mercantilism, and Disease in Shakespeare’s England (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press), p. 128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Donaldson, I. (2011) Ben Jonson – A Life (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 324331.Google Scholar
14.Lake, P. with Questier, M. (2002) The Antichrist’s Lewd Hat – Protestants, Papists and Players in Post-Reformation England (New Haven & London: Yale University Press), p. 591.Google Scholar