Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T14:43:19.921Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How do Public Policy-makers Perceive National Quality Infrastructure? The Case of Serbia as an EU Pre-accession Country

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2019

Jelena Ruso  and
Jovan Filipovic
Jelena Ruso
Affiliation:
University of Belgrade, Faculty of Organizational Sciences, Jove Ilića 154, Belgrade, Serbia. Email: [email protected]
Jovan Filipovic
Affiliation:
University of Belgrade, Faculty of Organizational Sciences, Jove Ilića 154, Belgrade, Serbia. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article, we develop a framework for a comparative analysis of policy-making in the EU pre- and post-accession CEE countries (CEECs) in order to create generalized knowledge in some particular areas, such as quality infrastructure (QI). In order to find how public policy-makers perceive QI, we employ a triangulation methodology. The results show that policy-makers are not fully familiar with national QI concepts and seldom rely on experts’ opinion. Moreover, QI legislation is uncritically transferred from the EU.

Type
Articles
Information
European Review , Volume 28 , Issue 2 , April 2020 , pp. 276 - 293
Copyright
© Academia Europaea 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ágh, A (1999) Europeanization of policy-making in East Central Europe: The Hungarian approach to EU accession. Journal of European Public Policy 6, 839–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akirav, O (2014) Legislators use of one-minute speeches. Global Journal of Human-Social Science Research 14, 35–44.Google Scholar
Apostolides, K (1998) Cyprus and the Enlargement of the European Union. Working Papers in Comparative and International Politics, University of Catania, JMWP No. 15.98.Google Scholar
Archibald, MM (2015) Investigator triangulation: A collaborative strategy with potential for mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 10, 228–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashbrook, JE (2010) Croatia, Euroskepticism, and the identity politics of EU enlargement. Problems of Post-communism 57, 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartlett, W and Samardžija, W (2000) The reconstruction of South East Europe, the Stability Pact and the role of the EU: an overview. MOST: Economic Policy in Transitional Economies 10, 245–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, WD and Baybeck, B (2005) Using geographic information systems to study interstate competition. American Political Science Review 99, 505–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, LE, Mitchell, G, Holden, J, Folkard, A, Wright, N, Beharry-Borg, N, Berry, G, Brierley, B, Chapman, P, Clarke, SJ, Cotton, L, Dobson, M, Dollar, E, Fletcher, M, Foster, J, Hanlon, A, Hildon, S, Hiley, P, Hillis, P, Hoseason, J, Johnston, K, Kay, P, McDonald, A, Parrott, A, Powell, A, Slack, RJ, Sleigh, A, Spray, C, Tapley, K, Underhill, R and Woulds, C (2010) Priority water research questions as determined by UK practitioners and policy makers. Science of the Total Environment 409, 256–266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bugarič, B (2015) A crisis of constitutional democracy in post-Communist Europe: ‘Lands in-between’ democracy and authoritarianism. International Journal of Constitutional Law 13, 219–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bugaric, B and Kuhelj, A (2015) Slovenia in crisis: A tale of unfinished democratization in East-Central Europe. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 48, 273–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, DP (2017) Service diversification and service quality differences in the third-party administration of US organic regulations. Public Management Review 19, 802–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castanheira, I, Robb, P, Owen, L, den Boer, H, Schmit, J, Ent, H and Calhau, MA (2007) A proposal to demonstrate a harmonized quality approach to analytical data production by EuroFIR. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 20, 725–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CEE Investment Report (2016) Mission to Outperform. Available at http://www.jll.ro/romania/en-gb/research/43/cee-investment-report-2016-mission-to-outperformGoogle Scholar
Choi, DG, Hyun, OS, Hong, JI and Kang, BG (2014) Standards as catalyst for national innovation and performance – a capability assessment framework for latecomer countries. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence 25, 969–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffey, D (2005) Measuring gubernatorial ideology: A content analysis of state of the state speeches. State Politics & Policy Quarterly 5, 88–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Czernielewska, M, Paraskevopoulos, CJ and Szlachta, J (2004) The regionalization process in Poland: An example of ‘Shallow’ Europeanization? Regional and Federal Studies 14, 461–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dąbrowski, M (2011) The impact of EU cohesion policy on the Polish sub-national actors: Shallow or deep change? In Regional Studies Association Annual International Conference, 18–20. Newcastle, UK: Newcastle University.Google Scholar
De Castella, K, McGarty, C and Musgrove, L (2009) Fear arousing content in political rhetoric about terrorism: An analysis of speeches by Australian Prime Minister Howard. Political Psychology 30, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dimitrova, AL (2010) The new member states of the EU in the aftermath of enlargement: Do new European rules remain empty shells? Journal of European Public Policy 17, 137–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolnicar, S and Grün, B (2014) Including don’t know answer options in brand image surveys improves data quality. International Journal of Market Research 56, 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elbasani, A (2013) Europeanization travels to the Western Balkans: Enlargement strategy, domestic obstacles and diverging reforms. In Elbasani, A (ed.), European Integration and Transformation in the Western Balkans: Europeanization or Business as Usual? Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Commission (1999) Regular Report on Slovakia’s Progress towards Accession. Brussels: EC.Google Scholar
European Commission (2005) The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia Analytical Report 2005. Brussels: EC.Google Scholar
European Commission. (2010) Montenegro Analytical Report 2010. Brussels: EC.Google Scholar
Falkner, G (2010) Institutional performance and compliance with EU law: Czech Republic, Hungary, Slovakia and Slovenia. Journal of Public Policy 30, 101–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fosco, GM and Bray, BC (2016) Profiles of cognitive appraisals and triangulation into interparental conflict: Implications for adolescent adjustment. Journal of Family Psychology 30, 533–542.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gallagher, T (2009) Romania and the European Union: How the Weak Vanquished the Strong. Manchester: Manchester University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giatzidis, E (2004) Bulgaria on the Road to European Union. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 4, 434–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonçalves, J, Göthner, KC, and Rovira, S (2015). Measuring the impact of quality infrastructure in Latin America: Experiences, achievements and limitations. Project document. Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean.Google Scholar
Grabbe, H (2001) How does Europeanization affect CEE governance? Conditionality, diffusion and diversity. Journal of European Public Policy 8, 1013–1031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halffman, W and Hoppe, R (2004) Science/policy boundaries: A changing division of labour in Dutch expert policy advice. In Maasse, S and Weingart, P (eds), Scientific Expertise and Political Decision Making. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Haughton, T (2007) When does the EU make a difference? Conditionality and the accession process in Central and Eastern Europe. Political Studies Review 5, 233–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haughton, T (2011) Half full but also half empty: Conditionality, compliance and the quality of democracy in Central and Eastern Europe. Political Studies Review 9, 323–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Head, BW (2013) Evidence-based policymaking – speaking truth to power? Australian Journal of Public Administration 72, 397–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Head, BW (2015) Relationships between policy academics and public servants: Learning at a distance? Australian Journal of Public Administration 74, 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Head, B, Ferguson, M, Cherney, A and Boreham, P (2014) Are policy-makers interested in social research? Exploring the sources and uses of valued information among public servants in Australia. Policy and Society 33, 89–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubo, C and Krott, M (2013) Conflict camouflaging in public administration—a case study in nature conservation policy in Lower Saxony. Forest Policy and Economics 33, 63–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kabele, J and Linek, L (2004) Decision-making of the Czech Cabinet, EU Accession and Legislative Planning between 1998 and 2004. In ECPR Joint Session of Workshops, workshop (No. 10). Sweden.Google Scholar
Kaminska, J (2010) The link between national foreign policy and the performance of a country in the European Union: The Polish Case. Journal of Contemporary European Research 6, 69–84.Google Scholar
Karaczun, Z (2005) Preparing for EU environmental policy in Poland: The case of the nitrates directive. Land Use Policy 22, 245–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karamfilova, E (2005) The Evolution of the Competition Law in Bulgaria with View to the Accession of the Country to the European Union. Master thesis. Nice: Centre International de Formation Européenne.Google Scholar
Koc, E and Boz, H (2014) Triangulation in tourism research: A bibliometric study of top three tourism journals. Tourism Management Perspectives 12, 9–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopecký, P (2005) Parliaments in Central and Eastern Europe: Changing legislative institutions. Czech Sociological Review 41, 361–373.Google Scholar
Korkut, U (2010) More reform, less action: Dilemmas of economic Europeanization in Hungary. Problems of Post-Communism 57, 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koszewska, M (2003) Rules governing marketability of goods in the Single European Market – The protective clothing market. Fibres and Textiles in Eastern Europe 11, 8–14.Google Scholar
Koutalakis, C (2010) Enabling harmonization – Business actors and the eastern enlargement of the EU. Acta Politica 45, 247–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kovač, P and Jukić, T (2017) Declarations and reality of Europeanized public administration in Eastern Europe: Journals content analysis in Slovenia and Croatia. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences 13, 127–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Král, D and Bartovic, V (2010) The Czech and the Slovak Parliaments after the Lisbon Treaty. Prague, Czech Republic: EUROPEUM Institute for European Policy.Google Scholar
Krašovec, A and Johannsen, L (2016) Recent developments in democracy in Slovenia. Problems of Post-Communism 63, 313–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kratochvíl, P and Tichý, L (2013) EU and Russian discourse on energy relations. Energy Policy 56, 391–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krizsan, A and Popa, R (2009) Stretching EU conditionality: Mechanisms of Europeanization in making domestic violence policies in Central and Eastern Europe. European Integration Online Papers 13. Available at www.researchgate.net/profile/Andrea_Krizsan/publication/228918851_Stretching_EU_Conditionality_Mechanisms_of_Europeanization_in_Making_Domestic_Violence_Policies_in_Central_and_Eastern_Europe/links/09e4151113a4e53c87000000.pdfGoogle Scholar
Láštic, E (2007) Legislative and executive power after EU accession in Slovakia: Two years evaluated. In Coombes, D and Vass, L (eds.), Post-Communist Public Administration. Bratislava: NISPAcee, pp. 67–79.Google Scholar
Lazowski, A (2001) Adaptation of the Polish Legal System to European Union Law: Selected Aspects. SEI working paper, 45, University of Sussex.Google Scholar
Malová, D and Haughton, T (2002) Making institutions in Central and Eastern Europe, and the impact of Europe. West European Politics 25, 101–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendelski, M (2015) The EU’s pathological power: The failure of external rule of law promotion in South Eastern Europe. Southeastern Europe 39, 318–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikulova, K (2013) Potemkin Europeanisation’? Dynamics of party competition in Poland and Hungary in 1998–2004. East European Politics and Societies 28, 163–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musa, A and Petak, Z (2015) Coordination for policy in transition countries: Case of Croatia. International Public Administration Review 13, 117–159.Google Scholar
Neiman, JL, Gonzalez, FJ, Wilkinson, K, Smith, KB and Hibbing, JR (2015) Speaking different languages or reading from the same script? Word usage of democratic and republican politicians. Political Communication 33, 212–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, J, Cherney, A and Head, BW (2016) Do policy makers use academic research? Reexamining the ‘two communities’ theory of research utilization. Public Administration Review 76, 24–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, K and Denza, E (1999) IV. External relations. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 48, 716–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nikolova, P (2006) Negotiating for EU membership? The Case of Bulgaria and Romania. Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy 2, 393–412.Google Scholar
O’Brennan, J and Raunio, T (2007) National Parliaments and within the Enlarged European Union: From Victims of Integration to Competitive Actors? London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Open Parliament (2017) Available at: http://www.otvoreniparlament.rs/Google Scholar
Orlović, S (2012) Comparative Analysis of Democratic Performance of the Parliaments of Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina and Montenegro. University of Belgrade, Sarajevo Open Centre and University of Montenegro.Google Scholar
Papadimitriou, D and Gateva, E (2009) Between enlargement-led Europeanisation and Balkan exceptionalism: An appraisal of Bulgaria’s and Romania’s entry into the European Union. Perspectives on European Politics and Society 10, 152–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pejović, G, Filipović, J and Tasić, L (2011) How to remove barriers to medicines trade in emerging economies: The role of medicines regulatory authority in Serbia. Accreditation and Quality Assurance 16, 253–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penev, S (2009) Improving the Process of Economic Reform Legislation in Western Balkan Countries. OECD Investment Compact for South East Europe.GTZ and Economics Institute Belgrade.Google Scholar
Perona-Garcelán, S, Úbeda-Gómez, J, León-Palacios, MG, Barros-Albarrán, MD, Escudero-Pérez, S, López-Jiménez, AM, Vallina-Fernández, O, Jiménez-García-Bóveda, R, Diez-Alegría, C, Rodríguez-Testal, JF, Ruiz-Veguilla, M, García-Montes, JM, Pérez-Álvarez, M and Hayward, M (2016) An exploration of the reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the ‘Voice and You’ (VAY): A scale for measuring the relationship with voices. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy 23, 183–188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Physikalisch Technische Bundesanstalt (PT B) (2007) Values and Rules for Global Responsibility Quality Infrastructure: A Step towards Good Governance. Braunschweig, Germany: PTB.Google Scholar
Pitman, T (2012) Selling visions for education: What do Australian politicians believe in, who are they trying to convince and how? Australian Journal of Education 56, 226–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Přibáň, J (2007) Legal Symbolism: On Law, Time and European Identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Racine, JL (2011) Harnessing Quality for Global Competitiveness in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Washington: World Bank Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risteska, M (2013) The role of the EU in promoting good governance in Macedonia: Towards efficiency and effectiveness or deliberative democracy? Nationalities Papers 41, 431–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rommetvedt, H, Zajc, D and Langhelle, O (2009) The internationalization of national parliaments: The Norwegian Storting and the Slovene Državnizbor. Politics in Central Europe 5, 55–85.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S, Caprara, G and Vecchione, M (2010) Basic personal values, core political values, and voting: A longitudinal analysis. Political Psychology 31, 421–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Šik, M (2011) Transposition of EU Legislation in New Member States: A Case Study of the Czech Republic. Doctoral dissertation, Central European University.Google Scholar
Smigic, N, Rajkovic, A, Djekic, I and Tomic, N (2015) Legislation, standards and diagnostics as a backbone of food safety assurance in Serbia. British Food Journal 117, 94–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spendzharova, AB (2003) Bringing Europe in? The impact of EU conditionality on Bulgarian and Romanian politics. Southeast European Politics 4, 141–156.Google Scholar
Spruijt, P, Knol, AB, Vasileiadou, E, Devilee, J, Lebret, E and Petersen, AC (2014) Roles of scientists as policy advisers on complex issues: A literature review. Environmental Science and Policy 40, 16–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Şurubaru, NC (2013) Challenges or challenging ‘Europeanization’ and ‘Multi-level governance’? – evidence from Bulgaria’s and Romania’s Structural Funds absorption (2007-2013) – a focus on regional actors. In ECPR General Conference. Bordeaux, France: European Consortium for Political Research.Google Scholar
Tamtik, M and Sá, CM (2012) The role of experts in the European Union’s research policy. Review of Policy Research 29, 449–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, A (2015) Environmental governance in Croatia and Macedonia: Institutional creation and evolution. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 33, 969–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tews, K (2009) From law-taking to policy-making. The environmental dimension of the EU accession process – challenges, risks and chances for the SEE countries. Environmental Policy and Governance 19, 130–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tippmann, C (2013) The national quality infrastructure. Policy Brief, World Bank.Google Scholar
Trauner, F (2009) Post-accession compliance with EU law in Bulgaria and Romania: A comparative perspective. European Integration Online Papers 13.Google Scholar
Treib, O and Falkner, G (2007) Making dead letters live: Strategies to improve the effectiveness of EU legislation in Central and Eastern Europe. In EUSA 10th Biennial International Conference. Montreal, Canada: Institute for advanced studies, Department of Political Sciences.Google Scholar
Vidačak, I and Škrabalo, M (2014) Exploring the effects of Europeanization on the openness of public administration in Croatia. Croatian and Comparative Public Administration 14, 149–187.Google Scholar
Vladeva, M (2015) Europeanization of the Western Balkans: What Drives Montenegro on This Path? Doctoral dissertation, Central European University.Google Scholar
Walsh, P (2013) Exploring the Limits of Europeanisation: Rule Compliance and Elite Resistance in Bosnia and Macedonia. Master Thesis, Freie Universität Berlin.Google Scholar
Weber, M (1922) Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Mohr: Tubingen.Google Scholar
Williams, MB (2001) Exporting the democratic deficit: Hungary’s experience with EU integration. Problems of Post-Communism 48, 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, B (2013) The Europeanisation of Hungary: Institutional adjustment and the effects of European Union integration. Journal of Politics and International Studies 10, 271.Google Scholar
Zajc, D (2005) Role of Slovenian parliament in the process of transition, legislative reconstruction and EU membership. Politička misao 42, 111–132.Google Scholar
Zhu, X (2013) Policy change and expert involvement in China. Public Administration 91, 281–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar