Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T16:39:26.403Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Explaining Change: The Online Political Marketing of the Romanian Social Democrats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2020

Marius Grad  and
Claudiu Marian
Marius Grad
Affiliation:
Department of International Studies and Contemporary History, Faculty of History and Philosophy, Babeş-Bolyai University, Mihail Kogălniceanu St., No. 1, Room 305, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Email: [email protected]
Claudiu Marian
Affiliation:
Department of International Studies and Contemporary History, Faculty of History and Philosophy, Babeş-Bolyai University, Mihail Kogălniceanu St., No. 1, Room 305, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the most recent two decades, the political campaigns conducted by the Social Democratic Party in Romania targeted specific groups of voters, with little intention to attract new voters. The reason behind their strategy is that they could secure a relatively constant support of roughly one third of the electorate and so win the popular vote in every election since 2000. However, the 2016 parliamentary elections marked a turning point in this approach and the party used almost exclusively online marketing to organize, streamline and channel its messages. This article seeks to understand why this change occurred although it did not seem to be necessary. This change is more surprising in a context in which the main political competitors were weak and disorganized. Our qualitative analysis aims to identify and explain the main elements that determined this change. It accounts for three main variables: experiential learning, the role of a new party leader and the use of new opportunities.

Type
Articles
Information
European Review , Volume 28 , Issue 5 , October 2020 , pp. 778 - 792
Copyright
© Academia Europaea 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adam, S and Maier, M (2010) Personalization of politics: a critical review and agenda for research. Annals of the International Communication Association 34(1), 213–257.10.1080/23808985.2010.11679101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adams, J and Somer-Topcu, Z (2009) Policy adjustment by parties in response to rival parties’ policy shifts: spatial theory and the dynamics of party competition in twenty-five post-war democracies. British Journal of Political Science 39(4), 825–846.10.1017/S0007123409000635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Androniciuc, A-I (2016) Using social media in political campaigns. Evidence from Romania. SEA – Practical Application of Science (10), 51–57.Google Scholar
Attewell, P and Gerstein, DR (1979) Government policy and local practice. American Sociological Review 44(2), 311–327.10.2307/2094513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ban, C (2016) Romania and right-wing populism: an eastern European outliner? Retrieved from http://www.euvisions.eu/archive/populism-eastern-european/Google Scholar
Bannon, DP (2005) Relationship marketing and the political process. Journal of Political Marketing 4(2–3), 73–90.10.1300/J199v04n02_04CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bíró-Nagy, A, Kadlót, T, Lafferton, S and Lakner, M (2016) The State of Social Democratic Parties in Central and Eastern Europe. Budapest: Policy Solutions.Google Scholar
Brants, K and Voltmer, K (2011) Political Communication in Postmodern Democracy: Challenging the Primacy of Politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.10.1057/9780230294783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, A, Ainsworth, S and Grant, D (2012) The rhetoric of institutional change. Organization Studies 33(3), 297–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Budge, I (1994) A new spatial theory of party competition: uncertainty, ideology and policy equilibria viewed comparatively and temporally. British Journal of Political Science 24(4), 443–467.10.1017/S0007123400006955CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, J, Green, J, Jenkins, H and Hartley, J (2013) YouTube: Online Video and Participatory Culture. Cambridge: Polity Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books?id=0NsWtPHNl88CGoogle Scholar
Cervi, L and Roca, N (2017) Towards an Americanization of political campaigns? The use of Facebook and Twitter for campaigning in Spain, USA and Norway. Anàlisi (56), 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiru, M and Ciobanu, I (2009) Legislative recruitment and electoral system change: the case of Romania. CEU Political Science Journal 4(2), 192–231.Google Scholar
Cohen, MD, March, JG and Olsen, JP (1972) A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly 17(1), 1–25.10.2307/2392088CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crozier, M (1979) On ne change pas la societe par decret. Paris: B. Grasset.Google Scholar
Cyert, RM and March, JG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs: NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Dacin, MT, Goodstein, J and Scott, WR (2002) Institutional theory and institutional change: introduction to the special research forum. The Academy of Management Journal 45(1), 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daft, R and Becker, S (1978) Innovation in organizations. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Elster, J (1979) Ulysses and the Sirens: Studies in Rationality and Irrationality. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Emanuele, V, Chiaramonte, A and Soare, S (2018) Does the Iron Curtain still exist? The convergence in electoral volatility between Eastern and Western Europe. Government and Opposition, online first, 1–19.Google Scholar
Ezrow, L, Vries, C De, Steenbergen, M and Edwards, E (2011) Mean voter representation and partisan constituency representation: do parties respond to the mean voter position or to their supporters? Party Politics 17(3), 275–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freedland, J (2012) How Mitt Romney’s missteps kept Obama in the presidential race. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/nov/06/romney-missteps-obama-us-electionGoogle Scholar
Gherghina, S (2013) Going for a safe vote: electoral bribes in post-Communist Romania. Debatte: Journal of Contemporary Central and Eastern Europe 21(2–3), 143–164.Google Scholar
Gherghina, S (2014) Party Organization and Electoral Volatility in Central and Eastern Europe: Enhancing Voter Loyalty. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gherghina, S and Chiru, M (2018a) Ⓘntre ideologie şi strategie: programele partidelor pentru alegerile legislative naţionale 2016. Cluj-Napoca: CA Publishing.Google Scholar
Gherghina, S and Chiru, M (2018b) Romania: an ambivalent parliamentary opposition. In De Giorgi, E and Iolnszki, G (eds), Opposition Parties in European Legislatures: Responsiveness Without Responsibility? Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 191–209.10.4324/9781315561011-11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gherghina, S and Jiglau, G (2012) Where does the mechanism collapse? Understanding the 2008 Romanian electoral system. Representation 48(4), 445–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gherghina, S and Volintiru, C (2017) A new model of clientelism: political parties, public resources, and private contributors. European Political Science Review 9(1), 115–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, D, Palmquist, B and Schickler, E (2002) Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters. London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Gregor, M and Matušková, A (2014) Electoral campaigns and marketing strategy – the case study of Karel Schwarzenberg’s campaign. Czech Journal of Social Sciences, Business and Economics 3(4), 24–31.Google Scholar
Gross, N and Giacquinta, J (1971) Implementing Organizational Innovations: A Sociological Analysis of Planned Educational Change. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gross, P (2015) (Happily) Living in sin: media and politics in Romania. Southeastern Europe 39(1), 12–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, F (1975) Organizational goals: the status of theory and research. In Livingstone, L (ed.), Managerial Accounting: The Behavioral Foundations. Ohio: Grid Publishing, pp. 198–208.Google Scholar
Harmel, R and Janda, K (1994) An integrated theory of party goals and party change. Journal of Theoretical Politics 6(3), 259–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hellstrom, T and Jacob, M (2000) Scientification of politics or politicization of science? Traditionalist science-policy discourse and its quarrels with Mode 2 epistemology. Social Epistemology 14(1), 69–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendricks, JA and Schill, D (2014) Presidential Campaigning and Social Media: An Analysis of the 2012 Campaign. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hillygus, S and Shields, T (2009) The Persuadable Voter. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, G (2016) Israeli strategists win Romanian election. The Jerusalem Post. Retrieved from https://www.jpost.com/Israel-News/Politics-And-Diplomacy/Israeli-strategists-win-Romanian-election-475699Google Scholar
Huse, E and Cummings, T (1989) Organization Development and Change. St. Paul: West Publishing.Google Scholar
Irawanto, B (2019) Making it personal: the campaign battle on social media in Indonesia’s 2019 presidential election. ISEAS Perspective (28). Retrieved from https://www.iseas.edu.sg/images/pdf/ISEAS_Perspective_2019_28.pdfGoogle Scholar
Jepperson, R (1991) Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism. In Powell, W and DiMaggio, P (eds), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 143–163.Google Scholar
Karan, K, Gimeno, J and Tandoc, E (2008) Internet and social networking sites in election campaigns: Gabriela Women’s Party in Philippines wins the 2007 elections. In Politics: Web 2.0: An International Conference. London: University of London.Google Scholar
Katz, D and Kahn, R (1978) The Social Psychology of Organizations. New Jersey: Wiley.Google Scholar
Kedrowski, KM and Moyon, KD (2017) When the party comes to town: experiential learning during a presidential nominating convention. Journal of Political Science Education 13(3), 295–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimberly, J and Quinn, R (1984) Managing Organizational Transitions. Homewood: Irwin.Google Scholar
Lees-Marshment, J (2009) Political Marketing: Principles and Applications. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203875223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lilleker, D and Jackson, N (2011) Political Campaigning, Elections and the Internet: Comparing the US, UK, France and Germany. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lindblom, CE (1959) The science of ‘muddling through’. Public Administration Review 19(2), 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lounsbury, M and Ventresca, M (2003) The new structuralism in organizational theory. Organization 10(3), 457–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahony, J and Thelen, K (2010) Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency, and Power. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
March, JG (1978) Bounded rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice. The Bell Journal of Economics 9(2), 587–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, JG (1981) Footnotes to organizational change. Administrative Science Quarterly 26(4), 563–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, JG and Olsen, JP (1984) The new institutionalism: organizational factors in political life. The American Political Science Review 78(3), 734–749.10.2307/1961840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, JG, Olsen, JP and Christensen, S (1976) Ambiguity and Choice in Organizations. Bergen: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Mares, I, Muntean, A and Petrova, T (2018) Economic intimidation in contemporary elections: evidence from Romania and Bulgaria. Government and Opposition 53(3), 486–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAllister, I (2007) The personalization of politics. In Dalton, R and Klingemann, H-D (eds), Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mihalache, D and Huiu, I (2015) Alegerile prezidenţiale din 2014 – rezultat surpriză sau strategie. Sfera Politicii 23(1), 29–39.Google Scholar
Momoc, A (2011) Candidaţii populişti şi noile tehnologii (Blog, Facebook, YouTube) în alegerile prezidenţiale din 2009. Sfera Politicii 18(8), 39–46.Google Scholar
Neagu, A (2016) Presa din Israel: Campania electorala a PSD, coordonata de consultanti israelieni. Retrieved 15 April 2019, from https://www.hotnews.ro/stiri-politic-21480311-psd-apelat-consultanti-israelieni-campania-electorala.htmlGoogle Scholar
Nelson, C and Thurber, J (1995) Campaigns and Elections American Style: The Changing Landscape of Political Campaigns. San Francisco: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Nelson, R and Yates, D (1978) Innovation and Implementation in Public Organizations. Lexington: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
North, DC (1990) A transaction cost theory of politics. Journal of Theoretical Politics 2(4), 355–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, JP and March, JG (1989) Rediscovering Institutions: The Organizational Basis of Politics. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Pande, S (2014) Just the right image. Retrieved 15 January 2019, from https://www.businesstoday.in/magazine/case-study/case-study-strategy-tactics-behind-creation-of-brand-narendra-modi/story/206321.htmlGoogle Scholar
Panebianco, A (1988) Political Parties: Organization and Power. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Patrut, M (2014) Facebook dispute concerning the presidency. Case study: Romania. In Patrut, M and Patrut, B (eds), Social Media in Politics: Case Studies on the Political Power of Social Media. Berlin: Springer, pp. 245–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeffer, J (1981) Understanding Power in Organizations. Marshfield: Pitman Publishing.Google Scholar
R.M. (2014) PSD face campanie sub sloganul ‘Mandri ca suntem romani’ cu poze din Belarus si Polonia. Retrieved 3 March 2019, from https://economie.hotnews.ro/stiri-media_publicitate-17140873-psd-face-campanie-sub-sloganul-mandri-suntem-romani-poze-din-belarus-polonia.htm?nomobile=Google Scholar
Shea, D and Burton, M (2001) Campaign Craft: The Strategies, Tactics and Art of Political Campaign Management. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Shusko, O and Lisnychuk, O (2015) The political campaign and Ukraine’s political evolution. In Kurth, H and Kempe, I (eds), The Political Campaign and Ukraine`s Political Evolution. Kyiv: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.Google Scholar
Sikk, A (2005) How unstable? Volatility and the genuinely new parties in Eastern Europe. European Journal of Political Research 44(3), 391–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sikk, A and Köker, P (2019) Party novelty and congruence: a new approach to measuring party change and volatility. Party Politics 25(6), 759–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A (2009) The internet’s role in campaign 2008. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2009/04/15/the-internets-role-in-campaign-2008/Google Scholar
Stan, L and Vancea, D (eds) (2015) Post-communist Romania at Twenty-Five: Linking Past, Present, and Future. London: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Stroud, N (2011) Niche News: The Politics of News Choice. Niche News: The Politics of News Choice. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, M and Kent, ML (2004) Congressional web sites and their potential for public dialogue. Atlantic Journal of Communication 12(2), 59–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Towner, TL and Dulio, DA (2011) The web 2.0 election: does the online medium matter? Journal of Political Marketing 10(1–2), 165–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaccari, C (2013) Social media and political communication. Rivista Italiana Di Scienza Politica 43(3), 381–410.Google Scholar
Vintila, CD and Soare, S (2018) Report on Political Participation of Mobile EU Citizens: Romania. Bucharest. Retrieved from Cadmus, European University Institute Research Repository, at: http://hdl.handle.net/1814/59406Google Scholar
Walker, JL (1969) The diffusion of innovations among the American states. The American Political Science Review 63(3), 880–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watt, E (2010) The Modernisation of Australian Political Campaigns: The Case of Maxine McKew. London: Media@ LSE.Google Scholar
Winter, SG (1975) Optimization and evolution in the theory of the firm. In Day, RH and Groves, T (eds), Adaptive Economic Models. Madison, Wisconsin: Academic Press, pp. 73–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolin, S (1961) Politics and Vision: Continuity and Innovation in Western Political Thought. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar