Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T17:02:29.601Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Counterfactual History and the First World War

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2017

R.C. Van Caenegem
R.C. Van Caenegem*
Affiliation:
Instituut voor Rechtsgeschiedenis, Universiteitsstraat 4, 9000 Gent, Belgium.
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the current article the author aims to answer four specific questions. (1) What would have happened if Austria and Serbia had not gone to war in July 1914, which implies an exercise in counterfactual history, and the study of the probable outcome if events had taken a different course? (2) What exactly was Austria’s war aim? (3) What precisely was Britain’s war aim? (4) What would have happened if Britain had stayed out of the continental war?

Type
Articles
Information
European Review , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , July 2017 , pp. 494 - 501
Copyright
© Academia Europaea 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. McMeekin, S. (2013) July 1914. Countdown to War (London: Icon Books), p. 31.Google Scholar
2. Ferguson, N. (2009 [1998]) The Pity of War (London: Penguin), p. 163.Google Scholar