Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:16:29.709Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The CEAS and the Europeanization of Turkey’s Asylum Policy after the Syrian Crisis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 July 2020

A. Asli Bilgin  and
Harun Arikan
A. Asli Bilgin
Affiliation:
Cukurova University, Saricam, Adana, Turkey. Email: [email protected]
Harun Arikan
Affiliation:
Cukurova University, Saricam, Adana, Turkey. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although the European Union (EU) has a Common European Asylum System (CEAS), the policy stance of the Member States towards the Syrian crisis caused some problems in the implementation of the CEAS. Within this context, Turkey has turned into the most important partner of the EU due to the fact that it prevents the entrance of the asylum-seekers into the territory of the Member States. Therefore, the Syrian issue has become a bargaining chip between Turkey and the EU. This article examines the Europeanization process of Turkey’s asylum policy as well as the development of the CEAS and its implementation with respect to Syrian refugees within the EU.

Type
Articles
Information
European Review , Volume 29 , Issue 6 , December 2021 , pp. 828 - 841
Copyright
© 2020 Academia Europaea

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arikan, H (2006) Turkey and the EU: An Awkward Candidate for EU Membership. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
BBC News (2016) Schengen: controversial EU free movement deal explained. Available at https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-13194723, (accessed16 July 2018).Google Scholar
Biehl, K (2009) Migration ‘Securitization’ and its everyday implications: an examination of Turkish asylum policy and practices. EUI Robert Schuman Centre Best Participant Essay Series 1, 1–15.Google Scholar
Bilgin, AA (2017) Gocmenlere yonelik deniz operasyonlarında Frontex’in mudahale yetkisinin uluslararası hukuk kapsamında değerlendirilmesi. Hacettepe Universitesi Hukuk Fakultesi Dergisi 7, 55–82.Google Scholar
Carrera, S, Blockmans, S, Gros, D and Guild, E (2015) The EU’s response to the refugee crisis taking stock and setting policy priorities. CEPS Essay No. 20/16, 1–22.Google Scholar
Chetail, V (2016) The Common European Asylum System: Bric-a-brac or system? In Chetail, V, De Bruycker, P and Maiani, F (eds), Reforming the Common European Asylum System: The New European Refugee Law. Boston: Brill Nijhoff, pp. 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Commission of the European Communities (2008) Policy plan on asylum: an integrated approach to protection across the EU, COM(2008) 360 Final, 17 June 2008. Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2008:0360:FIN:EN:PDF (accessed 13 February 2019).Google Scholar
Council of The European Union (2009) Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals or stateless persons as beneficiaries of international protection and the content of the protection granted (Recast) No. 14863/1/09 REV1. Available at http://register.consilium.europa.eu/doc/srv?cv=1&f=ST+14863+2009+REV+1&l=EN (accessed 13 February 2019).Google Scholar
Council of the EU (2009) The Stockholm Programme – An open and secure Europe serving and protecting the citizens No. 16484/1/09 REV1, Swedish Presidency. Available at http://www.statewatch.org/news/2009/nov/eu-stockholm-programme-25-nov-16484-rev1-09.pdf?cv=1 (accessed 13 February 2019).Google Scholar
Den Heijer, M, Rijpma, J and Spijkerboer, T (2016) Coercion, prohibition and great expectations: the continuing failure of the Common European Asylum System. Common Market Law Review 53, 607–642.Google Scholar
European Commission (1998) Regular Report from Commission on Turkey’s Progress towards Accession, COM (98), 491 final, Brussels, 44.Google Scholar
European Commission (2005) Regular Report from Commission on Turkey’s Progress towards Accession, COM (2005), 561 final, Brussels, 111.Google Scholar
European Commission (2014) Regular Report from Commission on Turkey’s Progress towards Accession, COM (2014), 700 final, Brussels, 64.Google Scholar
European Commission (2015) Press Releases EU–Turkey Joint Action Plan, October. Available at http://europa.eu/rapid/press/release_MEMO-15-8560_en.htm (accessed 12 February 2019).Google Scholar
European Council (2016) Statement of the EU Heads of States or Government. Press Release, 8 March 2016, Brussels.Google Scholar
European Commission (2018) Commission Staff Working Document Turkey, 2018 Report. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/neighbourhood-enlargement/sites/near/files/20180417-turkey-report.pdf (accessed 3 July 2019).Google Scholar
European Parliament (2012) Motion for a resolution on the situation in Syria (2012/2788(RSP)), B7-0438/2012, Brussels.Google Scholar
Exdaktylos, T and Radaelli, MC (2009) Research design in European studies: the case of Europeanization. Journal of Common Market Studies 47, 507–530.10.1111/j.1468-5965.2009.00820.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guild, E (2004) Seeking asylum: storm clouds between international commitments and EU legislative measures. European Law Review 29, 198–218.Google Scholar
Hatton, T (2015) Asylum policy in the EU: the case for deeper integration. Cesifo Economic Studies 605–637.10.1093/cesifo/ifv002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
İçduygu, A (2015) Syrian Refugees in Turkey: The Long Road Ahead. Washington DC, USA: Migration Policy Institute.Google Scholar
İçduygu, A and Keyman, F (2000) Globalization, security and migration: the case of Turkey. Global Governance 6, 383–398.10.1163/19426720-00603006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Icisleri Bakanligi Goc Idaresi Genel Mudurlugu (2005) National Action Plan for the adoption of EU Acquis in the field of Asylum and Migration. Available at www.goc.gov.tr/icerik3/iltica-ve-goc-ulusal-eylem-plani_327_344_699 (accessed 12 February 2019).Google Scholar
Ivanov, D (2015) Legislation on emergency relocation of asylum-seekers in the EU. European Parliamentary Research Service. Available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2015/569018/EPRS_BRI%282015%29569018_EN.pdf (accessed 16 July 2018).Google Scholar
Juss, S (2005) The decline and decay of European refugee policy. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 25, 749–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karakoulaki, M (2018) EU–Turkey deal: the burden on refugees in Greece. https://openmigration.org/en/analyses/eu-turkey-deal-the-burden-on-refugees-in-greece/ (accessed 15 February 2019).Google Scholar
Kaunert, C and Leonard, S (2012) The European Union asylum policy after the Treaty of Lisbon and the Stockholm Programme: towards supranational governance in a common area of protection? Refugee Survey Quarterly 31, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirisci, K (2000) Disaggregating Turkish citizenship and immigration practices. Middle Eastern Studies 36, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirisci, K (2007) Turkey: a country of transition from emigration to immigration. Mediterranean Politics 12, 91–97.10.1080/13629390601136871CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirisci, K (2014) Syrian Refugees and Turkey’s Challenges: Going beyond Hospitality. Washington, DC: Brooking Institute. Available at https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/syrian-Refugees-and-Turkeys-Challenges-May-14-2014.pdf (accessed 12 February 2019).Google Scholar
Peers, S (2012) EU visa lists. In Peers, S, Guild, E and Tomkin, J (eds), EU Immigration and Asylum Law: Visas and Border Controls. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, pp. 223–249.Google Scholar
Peers, S (2013) The second phase of the Common European Asylum System: a brave new world – or lipstick on a pig? Statewatch Analysis 11, 1–17.Google Scholar
Roman, E, Baird, T and Radcliffe, T (2016) Why Turkey is not a safe country? Statewatch Analysis 4, 1–26.Google Scholar
Tampere European Council (1999) Presidency Conclusions para. 14-15. Available at https://www.europarl.europa.eu/summits/tam_en.htm (accessed 06 March 2019).Google Scholar
Turkish National Programme for the Adoption of the Acquis (2001) Available at http://www.ab.gov.tr/_195_en.html (accessed 12 February 2019).Google Scholar
UNHCR, the UN Refugees Agency (2017) Global Focus: Turkey. Available at http://reporting.unhcr.org/node/2544#_ga=2.50140709.2030714074.1586112090-1450298113.1559908112 (accessed 12 February 2019).Google Scholar