Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T02:19:03.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Can there be a European law?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2009

E.-J. Mestmäcker
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the wake of the Maastricht Treaty on European Union the legitimacy of European institutions and their law-making powers are questioned in all Member States. These questions are related to the understanding of sovereignty as the final arbiter of right and wrong in the democratic nation state. The role of law in this context is analysed by relying on European thinkers of the enlightenment who have shaped our understanding of law and legal systems to this day: Jeremy Bentham, Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Immanuel Kant. An analysis of the case law of the European Court of Justice reveals the constitutionalization of European law. The chain that bound sovereignty and law together was broken when the Court ruled that the Treaty confers upon citizens the right to enforce specific Treaty obligations of Member States in their domestic Courts of law. The task for the Community is to develop standards of Community law that limit the Community's jurisdiction just as it limits the power of Member States.

Type
Research Article
Information
European Review , Volume 2 , Issue 1 , January 1994 , pp. 1 - 13
Copyright
Copyright © Academia Europaea 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Hondius, F. W. (1992) The New Architecture of Europe and Ius Commune Europaeum. In The Common Law of Europe and the Future of Legal Education, Witte, B. D. and Forder, C. (Eds.) 213–221.Google Scholar
2.Taupitz, J. (1993) Europäische Privatrechtsvereinheitlichung Heute und Morgen.Google Scholar
3.Frowein, J. A. (1991) The European Convention on Human Rights and the Public Order of Europe. In Collected Courses of the Academy of European Law 1990: The Protection of Human Rights in Europe, Vol. I, Book 2, 73–358.Google Scholar
4.Hart, H. L. A. (Ed.) (1970) Of laws in general. In The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham.Google Scholar
5.Levithan or the Matter, Form, and Power of a Commonwealth Ecclesiastical and Civil, Edition Molesworth, Vol. III, 251.Google Scholar
6.H.L.A., (1961) The Concept of Law, 6.Google Scholar
7.Bentham, J. (1970) An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, Burns, J. H. and Hart, H. L. A. (Eds.) 296.Google Scholar
8.Rousseau, J.-J. (1989) Auszug aus dem Plan eines ewigen Friedens des Herrn Abbé Saint Pierre. In Jean-Jacques Rosseau, Kulturkritische und politische Schriften, Fontius, M. (Ed.), Vol. 2, 8 (author's translation).Google Scholar
9.Gay, P. (1969) The Enlightenment, An Interpretation. The Science of Freedom. 404.Google Scholar
10.Kant, I. (1923) Zum ewigen Frieden, Ein philosophischer Entwurf. In Kant's Werke, Akademieausgabe Vol. VIII, 356/357 (author's translation).Google Scholar
11. (1914) Die Metaphysik der Sitten. In Kant's Werke, Akademieausgabe Vol. VI, §B, 230.Google Scholar
12.Burns, J. H. (1973) Bentham on Sovereignty, An Exploration. In Bentham and Legal Theory, James, N. H. (Ed.) 136.Google Scholar
13.Stolleis, M. (1992) Vom Monstrum lernen (to learn from the monster), Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung 24 April 1992.Google Scholar
14.Dahrendorf, R. (1993) Europa—Einheit und Vielfalt. In Damals, 74–79.Google Scholar
15.League of Nations Report (1927) Proceedings of the World Economic Conference,Held at Geneva,4 to 23 May, 1927, Vol. I, p. 152, Official Doc. No. C 356.M.129.1927; for a discussion of the deliberations concerning a European Union in the context of the League of Nations, see E. J. Mestmäcker (1965) Offene Märkte im System unverfälschten Wettbewerbs in der Europäischen Wirtschaftsgemeinschaft. In Wirtschaftsordnung und Rechtsordnung, Festschrift zum 70. Geburtstag von Franz Böhm, 345–391.Google Scholar
16.Tomuschat, C. (1992) Europe—a common constitutional space. In The Common Law of Europe and the Future of Legal Education. de Witte, B. and Forder, C. (Eds.) 133–147.Google Scholar
17.Frowein, J. A. (1990) The European Convention on Human Rights as the public order of Europe. In Collective Courses of the Academy of European Law, The Protection of Human Rights in Europe, Vol. I, Book 2, 273–356.Google Scholar
18. ECJ 5 February 1963—Case 26/62 (N. V. Algemene Transporten Expeditie Van Gend & Loos v. Niederländische Finanzverwaltung, E.C.R. IX (1963) page 7.Google Scholar
19. ECJ 14 December 1991, Opinion 1/91, Opinion delivered pursuant to the second subparagraph of Article 228(1) of the Treaty on the draft agreement between the Community, on the one hand, and the countries of the European Free Trade Association, on the other, relating to the creation of the European Economic Area, O.J. C 110/1 of 29 April 1992.Google Scholar
20. ECJ 31 March 1971—Case 22/70 (Commission v. Council), E.C.R. 1971, 263 no. 5/19; 26 April 1977—Opinion 1/76, E.C.R. 1977, 741.Google Scholar
21.Hamson, C. J. (1976) Methods of Interpretation—A Critical Assessment of the Results, Judicial and Academic Conference, 27–28 September 1976, 11–10.Google Scholar
22.Cappelletti, M., Seccombe, M. and Weiler, J. (1986) Integration through Law: Europe and the American Federal Experience, Vol. I: Methods, Tools and Institutions, Book I: A Political, Legal and Economic Overview, 32.Google Scholar
23.Rousseau, J.-J. (1946) The social contract or principles of political right. In Social Contract, Essays by Locke, Hume and Rousseau. With an Introduction by Sir Ernest Barker, Oxford University Press, 276–282.Google Scholar
24.Parekh, B. (Ed.) (1973) A critical examination of the declaration of rights. In Bentham's Political Thought 256–290.Google Scholar
25.Padover, S. K. (Ed.) (1971) Complete Madison, His Basic Writings.Google Scholar
26.ECJ 6 April 1976—Case 43/75 (Defrenne v. Sabena), E.C.R. 1976, 455, 472.Google Scholar
27.J. H. H. Weiler (1990–91) The Transformation of Europe, 100 Yale L.J. 2403, 2473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624, 638 (1943); also quoted by E. U. Petersmann in this context, Constitutional Functions and Constitutional Problems of International Economic Law, 1991, 401.Google Scholar
29.Engel, C. (1987) Position of public monopolies on broadcasting under the European Convention on Human Rights. In The Law and Economics of Transborder Telecommunications, A Symposium, Mestmäcker, E. J. (Ed.) 55–70.Google Scholar
30.Engel, C. (1993) Privater Rundfunk vor der Europäischen Menschenrechtskonvention [Private Broadcasting under the European Convention on Human Rights], (Law and Economics of International Telecommunications Vol. 19).Google Scholar
31.Stuart, Lord Mackenzie (1991) Proceedings of the Jacques Delors Colloquium 1991, Subsidiarity: The Challenge of Change, p. 42.Google Scholar
32.Scharpf, F. W. (1991) Kann es in Europa eine stabile föderale Balance geben? in Wildenmann [Hrsg.], Staatswerdung Europas, 423.Google Scholar
33. ECJ 20 February 1979—Case 120/78 (Rewe v. Bundesmonopolverwaltung für Branntwein, E.C.R. 649, 664.Google Scholar
34.Mestmäcker, E. J. (1988) Staat und Unternehmen im europäischen Gemeinschaftsrecht [State and Undertaking under Common Market Law], RabelsZ 52 526–586.Google Scholar
35.Ellger, R. (1992) Telecommunications in Europe: law and policy of the European Community in a key industrial sector. In Singular Europe, Economy and Polity of the European Community after 1992, Adams, W. J. (Ed.) The University of Michigan Press, 203–250.Google Scholar