Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:14:03.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Beyond an IT-driven Knowledge Society: Knowledge Management as Intertwined Sociotechnical Circulation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2012

Giuseppina Pellegrino
Giuseppina Pellegrino
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology and Political Science, University of Calabria, Via P. Bucci, 87036 Arcavacata di Rende, Italy. Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Starting from a critical review of Knowledge Management initiatives in managerial contexts, this contribution proposes an alternative approach to knowledge management as intertwined sociotechnical circulation. In most organizational settings, Knowledge Management has been driven by ICTs (Information and Communication Technologies) and has equated knowledge with information, and so faces massive failures and conflicting results. In order to overcome the influence of the managerial debate in Knowledge Management, an alternative approach is proposed. Drawing on the Mobility Paradigm, Science and Technology Studies, and Practice-based Studies, knowledge and its management are re-framed as a collective, situated, heterogeneous and contextual practice, performed through sociotechnical processes embedded in multiple infrastructures. A short agenda of outcomes and consequences of this alternative Knowledge Management is then outlined, in order to emphasize the continuity and dialectic relationship between theory and practice, conceptual and operational levels, in enabling knowledge transformation and circulation.

Type
Focus: Knowledge Management in Contemporary Europe
Information
European Review , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , 30 March 2012 , pp. 164 - 172
Copyright
Copyright © Academia Europaea 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Sheller, M. and Urry, J. (2006) The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A, 38(2), pp. 207–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Urry, J. (2007) Mobilities (Cambridge: Polity Press).Google Scholar
3.Adey, P. (2010) Mobility (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
4.Latour, B. (1989) Science in Action (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
5.Bijker, W.E. (1995) Of Bicycles, Bakelites and Bulbs (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).Google Scholar
6.Star, S.L. and Griesemer, J. (1989) Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907–1939. Social Studies of Science, 19, pp. 387–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Bowker, G. and Star, S.L. (2000) Sorting Things Out. Classification and Its Consequences (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning. Legitimate Peripheral Participation (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Gherardi, S. (2001) From organizational learning to practice-based knowing. Human Relations, 54(1), pp. 131–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Mathiasen, H. (2012) Time to rethink the concepts of knowledge dissemination and transfer in the educational system? A systems theoretical perspective. European Review, 20(2).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Nonaka, I. and Takeuchi, I. (1995) The Knowledge-creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.David, P.A. and Foray, D. (2002) An introduction to the economy of the knowledge society. International Social Science Journal, 54(171), pp. 9–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Von Krogh, G., Ichijo, K. and Nonaka, I. (2000) Enabling Knowledge Creation (Oxford: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Nonaka, I. and Nishiguchi, T. (2000) Knowledge Emergence. Social, Technical and Evolutionary Dimensions of Knowledge Creation (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
15.Polanyi, M. (1966) The Tacit Dimension (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
16.Bruner, J. (1986) Actual Minds, Possible Worlds (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Tsoukas, H. (1996) The firm as a distributed knowledge system: a constructionist approach. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter special issue), 11–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Wenger, E. (1998) Communities of Practice. Learning, Meaning and Identity (New York: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Pellegrino, G. (2005) La sfida dell'ipermediatizzazione. Tecnologie per il knowledge management tra rappresentazioni e non uso. Studi Organizzativi, 1, pp. 131–155.Google Scholar
20.Brown, J.S. and Duguid, P. (1998) Organizing knowledge. California Management Review, 40(3), pp. 90–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Villardi, B. and Pellegrino, G. (2005) Face-to-face and distant learning as emo-rational microprocesses. Understanding learning through collective learning from within. In S. Gherardi and D. Nicolini (eds) The Passion for Learning and Knowing. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Organizational Learning and Knowledge (Trento: University of Trento e-books), pp. 751–772.Google Scholar