Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:40:18.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Aggression at different levels of social complexity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2009

R. A. Hinde
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Aggression, in the sense of behaviour intended to harm others, is phenomenologically and causally different at different levels of social complexity. Aggression by one individual towards another depends largely on individual aggressiveness, although other propensities also are important. At the group level, factors relating to the special properties of groups become relevant. War is best considered as an institution, with individuals acting according to the rights and duties associated with their roles in that institution. Some factors that help maintain war as an institution are considered.

Type
Research Article
Information
European Review , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , January 1996 , pp. 49 - 59
Copyright
Copyright © Academia Europaea 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Tinklenberg, J. R. and Ochberg, F. M. (1981) Patterns of adolescent violence. In Hamburg, D. A. and Trudeau, M. B. (Eds) Biobehavioral Aspects of Aggression. Liss., New York.Google Scholar
2.Pulkkinen, L. (1987). Offensive and defensive aggression in humans. Aggressive Behavior, 13, 197–212.3.0.CO;2-E>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Lagerspetz, K. M. J. and Lagerspetz, K. Y. H. (1971) Changes in the aggressiveness of mice resulting from selective breeding, learning and social isolation. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 12, 241–248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Manning, A. (1989) The genetic bases of aggression. In Groebel, J. and Hinde, R. A. (Eds) Aggression & War. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
5.Baumrind, D. (1971) Current patterns of parental authority. Developmental Psychology Monographs, 4, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Dodge, K. A., Bates, J. R. and Pettit, G. S. (1990) Mechanisms in the cycle of violence. Science, 250, 1678–1683.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.McCord, J. (1988) Parental behavior in the cycle of aggression. Psychiatry, 51, 14–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Hinde, R. A., Tamplin, A. and Barrett, J. (1993) Home correlates of aggression in preschool. Aggressive Behaviour, 19, 85–105.3.0.CO;2-2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Pulkkinen, L. (1988) Delinquent development: theoretical and practical considerations. In Rutter, M. (Ed.) Studies of Psychosocial Risk. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
10.Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.Google Scholar
11.McCord, J. (1983) A longitudinal study of aggression and anti-social behavior. In van Dusen, K. T. and Medrick, S. A. (Eds) Prospective Studies of Crime & Deliquency, Kluwer-Nijoff, Boston.Google Scholar
12.Hartup, W. W. (1983) Peer relations. In Hetherington, E. M. (Ed.) Mussen Handbook of Child Psychology. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
13.Groebel, J. (1986) International research on television violence: synopsis and critique. In Huesmann, L. R. and Eron, L. D. (Eds) Television and the Aggressive Child. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
14.Pruitt, D. G. (1989) Aggressive behavior in interpersonal and international relations. In Stern, P. C., Axelrod, R., Jervis, R. and Radner, R. (Eds) Perspectives on Deterrence, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
15.Milgram, S. (1974) Obedience to Authority. Harper & Row, New York.Google Scholar
16.Dollard, J., Doob, L. W., Miller, N. E., Mowrer, O. H. and Sears, R. R. (1939) Frustration & Aggression. Yale University Press, New Haven.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Ulrich, R. E. (1966) Pain as a cause of aggression. American Zoologist, 6, 643–662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Zillman, D. (1979) Hostility & Aggression. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
19.Berkowitz, L. and le Page, A. (1967) Weapons as aggression—eliciting stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7, 202–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Daly, M. and Watson, M. (1988) Homicide. Aldine de Gruyter, New York.Google ScholarPubMed
21.Christensen, A. and Margolin, G., (1988) Conflict & alliance in distressed and non-distressed families. In Hinde, R. A. and Stevenson-Hinde, J. (Eds) Relationships within Families. Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
22.Patterson, G. R. and Dishion, T. J. (1988) Multilevel family process models: traits, interaction & relationships. In Hinde, R. A. and Stevenson-Hinde, J. (Eds) Relationships within Families, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
23.Engfer, A. (1986) Kindesmisshandlung: Ursachen, Auswirkungen, Hilfen. Enke, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
24.Prentice-Dunn, S. and Rogers, R. W. (1983) Deindividuation in aggression. In Geen, R. G. and Donnerstein, E. (Eds) Aggression: Theoretical & Empirical Review, 2, 155–172. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
25.Tajfel, H. (1978). Contributions to Tajfel, H. (Ed.) Differentiation Between Social Groups. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
26.Rabbie, J. (1991) Determinants of instrumental intra-group cooperation. In Hinde, R. A. and Groebel, J. (Eds) Cooperation and Prosocial Behaviour, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
27.Good, D. A. (1988) Individuals, interpersonal relations & trust. In Gambetta, D. (Ed.) Trust, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
28.Seekings, J. (1993) Heroes or Villains? Ravan Press, Johannesburg.Google Scholar
29.Straker, G., (1992) Faces in the Revolution. Ohio University Press, Athens, Ohio.Google Scholar
30.Haas, J. (1990) The Anthropology of War. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
31.Hastings, M. and Jenkins, J. (1983) The Battle for the Falklands. Pan Books, London.Google Scholar
32.Minnix, D. A. (1982) Small Groups & Foreign Policy Decision Making, University Press of America, Washington.Google Scholar
33.Tetlock, P. E., Husbands, J. L., Jervis, R., Stern, P. C. and Tilly, C. (Eds) (1989) Behavior, Society & Nuclear War. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
34.Feshbach, S. (1990) Psychology, human violence and the search for peace: issues in science and social values. Journal of Social Issues, 46, 185–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35.Prins, G. (Ed.) (1983) Defended to Death, Penguin, Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
36.Elworthy, S., Hamwee, J. and Miall, H. (1989) The assumptions of nuclear weapons decision makers. In Barnett, L. and Lee, I. (Eds) The Nuclear Mentality. Pluto, London.Google Scholar
37.Hinde, R. A. (1993) Aggression and war: individuals, groups and states. In Tetlock, P. E., Husbands, J. L., Jervis, R., Stern, P. C. and Tilly, C. (Eds) Behavior, Society and International Conflict, pp. 8–70. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
38.Hinde, R. A., (Ed.) (1991) The Institution of War. Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
39.Hinde, R. A. and Watson, H. (Eds) (1995) War: a Cruel Necessity? Tauris, London.Google Scholar