Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T07:02:27.097Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The role of technology and institutions for growth: Danish creameries in the late nineteenth century

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 July 2011

INGRID HENRIKSEN ,
MARKUS LAMPE  and
PAUL SHARP
INGRID HENRIKSEN
Affiliation:
University of Copenhagen, [email protected]
MARKUS LAMPE
Affiliation:
Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, [email protected]
PAUL SHARP
Affiliation:
Humboldt University/University of Copenhagen, [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

We consider the relative contributions of changing technology and institutions for economic growth through the investigation of a natural experiment in history: the almost simultaneous introduction of the automatic cream separator and the cooperative ownership form in the Danish dairy industry from around 1880. Using a new database of statistics from creameries and the tool of stochastic frontier analysis, we find that both institutions and technology were important for the success of the Danish dairy industry and, by implication, the growth and early development of the Danish economy.

Type
Research Article
Information
European Review of Economic History , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , December 2011 , pp. 475 - 493
Copyright
Copyright © European Historical Economics Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S. and Robinson, J. A. (2005). Institutions as a fundamental cause of long-run growth. In Aghion, P. and Durlauf, S. N. (eds.), Handbook of Economic Growth. Amsterdam: North-Holland, ch. 6, pp. 385–472.Google Scholar
Allen, Robert, C. (2009). The British Industrial Revolution in Global Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Álvarez, A. and Arías, C. (2004). Technical efficiency and farm size: a conditional analysis. Agricultural Economics 30, pp. 241–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axelsen Drejer, A. (1925–33). Mejeribruget. In Hansen, K. (ed.), Det danske landbrugs historie, vol. 4. Copenhagen: G. E. C. Gads Forlag.Google Scholar
Bailey, D., Biswas, B., Kumbhakar, S. C. and Schulthies, B. K (1989). An analysis of technical, allocative, and scale inefficiency: the case of Ecuadorian dairy farms. Western Journal of Agricultural Economics 14 (1), pp. 30–7.Google Scholar
Battese, G. E. and Coelli, T. J. (1995). A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier function for panel data. Empirical Economics 20, pp. 325–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjørn, C. (1977). Fællesmejerierne – en fase i Dansk Mejeribrugs Udvikling. Bol og by 2 (1), pp. 65–80.Google Scholar
Bjørn, C. (1982). Dansk mejeribrug 1882-1914. Aarhus: De Danske Mejeriers Fællesorganisation.Google Scholar
Brinkmann, Th. (1908). Die dänische Landwirtschaft. Jena: Gustav Fischer.Google Scholar
Burhop, C. and Lübbers, Th. (2009). Cartels, managerial incentives, and productive efficiency in German coal mining, 1881-1913. Journal of Economic History 69 (2), pp. 500–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bøggild, B. (1895). Mælkeribruget i Danmark 1894. Tidsskrift for Landøkonomi 5 (14), pp. 98–134.Google Scholar
Bøggild, B. (1896). Mælkeribruget i Danmark. Copenhagen: Det Nordiske Forlag.Google Scholar
Bøggild, B. (1899). Mælkeribruget i Danmark 1898. Tidsskrift for Landøkonomi 5 (18), pp. 133–63.Google Scholar
Bøggild, B. (1900) Andelsmælkerierne og deres Betydning for det danske Landbrugs Udvikling. Odense: Mælkeritidendes ForlagGoogle Scholar
Clark, G. (1994). Factory discipline. Journal of Economic History 54, pp. 128–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danmarks Mejeri-Drifts-Statistik (1899-2004) (edited in Odense by Udvalget for Mejeri-Statistik).Google Scholar
Ellbrecht, G. (1915–18). Danske Mejerier. Illustreret haandbog for mejeribruget i Danmark. Copenhagen: Selskabet til Udgivelse af Nationale Haandbøger.Google Scholar
Fan, Y., Li, Q. and Weersink, A. (1996). Semiparametric estimation of stochastic production frontier models. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 14 (4), pp. 460–8.Google Scholar
Fenger, R. (1873). Kan Kjødproduktionen betale sig under de nuværende Forhold i Danmark? Tidsskrift for Landøkonomi 4 (7), pp. 381–408.Google Scholar
Goldberger, A. S. (1968). The interpretation and estimation of Cobb-Douglas Functions. Econometrica, 35, pp. 464–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallam, D. and Machado, F. (1995). Efficiency analysis with panel data: a study of Portuguese dairy farms. European Review of Agricultural Economics 23, pp. 79–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henriksen, I. (1993). The transformation of Danish agriculture. In Persson, K. G. (ed.), The Economic Development of Denmark and Norway since 1870. Aldershot: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Henriksen, I. (1999). Avoiding lock-in: cooperative creameries in Denmark, 1882-1903. European Review of Economic History 3 (1), pp. 57–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henriksen, I. and Hviid, M. (2005). Diffusion of new technology and complementary best practice: a case study. European Review of Economic History 9 (3), pp. 365–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henriksen, I. and O'Rourke, K. H. (2005). Incentives, technology, and the shift to year-round dairying in late nineteenth-century Denmark. Economic History Review 58 (3), pp. 520–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henriksen, I., Hviid, M. and Sharp, P. (2010). Law and peace: contracts and the success of the Danish dairy cooperatives. Mimeo.Google Scholar
Henriksen, I., Lampe, M. and Sharp, P. (forthcoming). The strange birth of liberal Denmark: Danish trade protection and the growth of the dairy industry since the mid-nineteenth century. Economic History Review.Google Scholar
Heshmati, A. and Kumbhakar, S. C. (1994). Farm heterogeneity and technical efficiency: some results from Swedish dairy farms. Journal of Productivity Analysis 5, pp. 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornbeck, R. (2010). Barbed wire: property rights and agricultural development. Quarterly Journal of Economics 125 (2), pp. 767–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hviid, M. (2006). Incentive pay in the Danish cooperative dairies. Advances in the Economic Analysis of Participatory and Labor-Managed Firms 9, pp. 149–76.Google Scholar
Jensen, S. P. (1985). Landbrugets systemskifte 1870-1914 belyst gennem dagbøgerne og regnskaber fra en enkelt gård. Bol og By 2, pp. 56–101.Google Scholar
Jensen, S. P. (1988). ‘Planteavlen 1860-1914’ and ‘Husdyrbruget 1860-1914’. In Bjørn, C. (ed.), Det dansk landbrugs historie III, 1810-1914. Odense: Landbohistorisk Selskab.Google Scholar
Johansen, H. C. (1985). Danish Historical Statistics 1814-1980. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
Kumbhakar, S. C. and Lovell, C. A. K. (2000). Stochastic Frontier Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumbhakar, S. C., Biswas, B. and Bailey, D. (1989). A study of economic efficiency of Utah dairy farmers: a system approach. Review of Economics and Statistics 71 (4), pp. 595–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumbhakar, S. C., Ghosh, S. and McGuckin, J. T. (1991). A generalized production frontier approach for estimating determinants of inefficiency in US dairy farms. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics 9 (13), pp. 279–86.Google Scholar
Landes, D. S. (1986). What do bosses really do? Journal of Economic History 46, pp. 585–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leunig, T. (2010). Social savings. Journal of Economic Surveys 24 (5), 775–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mælkeritidende, tidsskrift for dansk mejeribrug (edited in Odense by Dansk Mejeristforening). Various dates.Google Scholar
Marglin, S. A. (1974). What do bosses do? The origins and functions of hierarchy in capitalist production. Review of Radical Political Economics 6, pp. 33–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ó Gráda, C. (1977). The beginnings of the Irish creamery system, 1880-1914. Economic History Review 30 (2), pp. 284–305.Google Scholar
O'Rourke, K. H. (2007). Culture, conflict and cooperation: Irish dairying before the Great War. Economic Journal 117, pp. 1357–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, J. (1999). Teknologisk udvikling i maskinindustrien, Burmeister & Wain 1875-1939. Copenhagen: Polyteknisk forlag.Google Scholar
Pedersen, M. C. (1885; 1981 ed. C. Bjørn). Beretning om Andelsmælkerivirksomheden i Vestjylland 1884-85. Esbjerg: Sydjysk Universitetsforlag.Google Scholar
Persson, K. G. (2010). An Economic History of Europe: Knowledge, Institutions and Growth, 600 to the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sonne, C. (1883). Mejeribruget i Danmark 1882. Tidskrift for Landøkonomi 5 (2), pp. 33–60.Google Scholar
Tauer, L. W. (2001). Efficiency and competitiveness of the small New York dairy farm. Journal of Dairy Science 84, pp. 2573–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tidsskrift for Landøkonomi (edited in Copenhagen by Det kgl. danske Landhusholdingsselskab). Various issues.Google Scholar
Van der Vleuthen, E. (1994). Smør og Damp. In Buhl, H. and Nielsen, H. (eds.), Made in Denmark. Nye studier i dansk teknologihistorie. Aarhus: Klim.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. (1980). The organization of work: a comparative institutional assessment. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1, pp. 5–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar