Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T03:26:49.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Globalization and the Great Divergence: terms of trade booms, volatility and the poor periphery, 1782–1913

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2008

JEFFREY G. WILLIAMSON
JEFFREY G. WILLIAMSON*
Affiliation:
Harvard University, Department of Economics, 350 South Hamilton Street, Unit 1002, Madison WI 53703, USA, [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

W. Arthur Lewis argued that a new international economic order emerged between 1870 and 1913, and that global terms of trade forces produced rising primary product specialization and de-industrialization in the poor periphery. More recently, modern economists argue that volatility reduces growth in the poor periphery. This article assesses these de-industrialization and volatility forces between 1782 and 1913 during the Great Divergence. First, it argues that the new economic order had been firmly established by 1870, and that the transition took place in the century before, not after. Second, evidence from 1870–1939 confirms that while terms of trade improvements raised long-run growth in the rich core, they did not do so in the poor periphery. Given that the secular terms of trade boom, and thus de-industrialization, was much bigger in the poor periphery before 1870 than after, one might plausibly infer that it might help explain the Great Divergence. Third, growth-reducing terms of trade volatility also contributed to the Great Divergence. Terms of trade volatility was much greater in the poor periphery than the core before 1870. It was still very big after 1870, certainly far bigger than in the core. Based on evidence drawn from 1870–2000, we know that such volatility lowers long-run growth in the poor periphery, and that the negative impact is big. Since terms of trade volatility in the poor periphery was even bigger before 1870, one might plausibly infer that it also helps explain the Great Divergence before 1870.

Type
Research Article
Information
European Review of Economic History , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , December 2008 , pp. 355 - 391
Copyright
Copyright © European Historical Economics Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S. and Robinson, J. (2005). The rise of Europe: Atlantic trade, institutional change and economic growth. American Economic Review 95 (June), pp. 546–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aghion, P., Angeletos, G.-M., Banerjee, A. and Manova, K. (2005). Volatility and growth: credit constraints and productivity-enhancing investments. NBER Working Paper 11349, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aghion, P., Bacchetta, P., Rancière, R. and Rogoff, K. (2006). Exchange rate volatility and productivity growth: the role of financial development. CEPR Discussion Paper no. 5629, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aizenman, J. and Martion, N. (1999). Volatility and investment: interpreting evidence from developing countries. Economica 66, pp. 157–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baptista, A. (1997). Bases cuantitativas de la economía venezolana 1830–1995. Caracas: Fundación Polar.Google Scholar
Bates, R. H., Coatsworth, J. H. and Williamson, J. G. (2007). Lost decades: post-independence performance in Latin America and Africa. Journal of Economic History 67 (December), pp. 917–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernhofen, D. M. and Brown, J. C. (2005). An empirical assessment of the comparative advantage gains from trade: evidence from Japan. American Economic Review 95 (March), pp. 208–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blattman, C., Hwang, J. and Williamson, J. G. (2007). The impact of the terms of trade on economic development in the periphery, 1870–1939: volatility and secular change. Journal of Development Economics 82 (January), pp. 156–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bleaney, M. and Greenway, D. (2001). The impact of terms of trade and real exchange rate volatility on investment and growth in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Development Economics 65, pp. 491–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, J., Braun, M., Briones, I., Diaz, J., Luders, R. and Wagner, G. (2000). Economia Chilena 1810–1995: estadisticas historicas. Santiago: Pontifica Universidad Catolica de Chile.Google Scholar
Broadberry, S. and Gupta, B. (2006). The early modern great divergence: wages, prices and economic development in Europe and Asia, 1500–1800. Economic History Review 59, 1, pp. 2–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bulmer-Thomas, V. (1994). The Economic History of Latin America Since Independence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Catão, L. and Kapur, S. (2004). Missing link: volatility and the debt intolerance paradox. International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC, unpublished (January).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, G. (2007) A Farewell to Alms: A Brief Economic History of the World, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, G., O'Rourke, K. H. and Taylor, A. M. (2008). Made in America? The new world, the old, and the industrial revolution. American Economic Review 98, 2 (May), pp. 523–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clingingsmith, D. and Williamson, J. G. (2008). Deindustrialization in 18th and 19th century India: Mughal decline, climate shocks, and British industrial ascent. Explorations in Economic History (forthcoming July).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coatsworth, J. H. and Williamson, J. G. (2004). The roots of Latin American protectionism: looking before the great depression. In Estevadeordal, A., Rodrik, D., Taylor, A. and Velasco, A. (eds.), FTAA and Beyond: Prospects for Integration in the Americas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Critz, J. M., Olmsted, A. L. and Rhode, P. W. (2000). International competition and the development of the dried fruit industry 1880–1930. In Pamuk, S. and Williamson, J. G. (eds.), The Mediterranean Response to Globalization before 1950. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Deaton, A. and Miller, R. I. (1996). International commodity prices, macroeconomic performance and politics in sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of African Economics 5, pp. 99–191, supplement.Google Scholar
Dercon, S. (2004). Insurance Against Poverty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, J. M. (1997). Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Diaz-Alejandro, C. F. (1984). Latin America in the 1930s. In Thorp, R. (ed.), Latin America in the 1930s: The Role of the Periphery in World Crisis. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobado González, R., Gómez Galvarriato, A. and Williamson, J. G. (2008). Mexican exceptionalism: globalization and de-industrialization 1750–1877. Journal of Economic History 68 (September), pp. 758–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dohan, M. (1973). Two Studies in Soviet Terms of Trade, 1918–1970. Bloomington: International Development and Research Center, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Easterly, W., Kremer, M., Pritchett, L. and Summers, L. H. (1993). Good policy or good luck? Country growth performance and temporary shocks. Journal of Monetary Economics 32, pp. 459–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterly, W. and Levine, R. (2003). Tropics, germs, and crops: how endowments influence economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics (January), pp. 3–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elbers, C., Gunning, J. W. and Kinsey, B. (2007). Growth and risk: methodology and micro evidence. The World Bank Economic Review 21, 1, pp. 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fafchamps, M. (2004). Rural Poverty, Risk and Development. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Fatás, A. and Mivhov, I. (2006). Policy volatility, institutions and economic growth. INSEAD, Singapore and Fontainebleau, France, unpublished.Google Scholar
Ferguson, N. (2004). Empire: How Britain Made the Modern World. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Findlay, R. and O'Rourke, K. H. (2007). Power and Plenty: Trade, War, and the World Economy in the Second Millennium. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flug, K., Splilimbergo, A. and Wachtenheim, A. (1999). Investment in education: do economic volatility and credit constraints matter? Journal of Development Economics 55, 2, pp. 465–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankenberg, E., Beegle, K., Sikoki, B. and Thomas, D. (1999). Health, family planning and well-being in Indonesia during an economic crisis: early results from the Indonesian family life survey. RAND Labor and Population Program Working Paper Series 99–06, Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.Google Scholar
Gerschenkron, A. (1966). Economic Backwardness in Historical Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Glazier, I., Bandera, V. and Brenner, R. (1975). Terms of trade between Italy and the United Kingdom 1815–1913. Journal of European Economic History 4, 1 (Spring), pp. 30–1.Google Scholar
Gómez Galvarriato, A. and Williamson, J. G. (2008). Was it prices, productivity or policy? The timing and pace of Latin American industrialization after 1870. NBER Working Paper 13990, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA (April).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadass, Y. and Williamson, J. G. (2003). Terms of trade shocks and economic performance 1870–1940: Prebisch and Singer revisited. Economic Development and Cultural Change 51 (April), pp. 629–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsiao, L.-L. (1974). China's Foreign Trade Statistics 1864–1949. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, J. R. (1971). Effect on prices of Japan's entry into world commerce after 1858. Journal of Political Economy 79, 3, pp. 614–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huff, G. and Caggiano, G. (2007). Globalization and labour market integration in late nineteenth- and early twentieth century Asia. Department of Economics, University of Glasgow, unpublished.Google Scholar
Hummels, D. (1999). Have international transportation costs declined? University of Chicago: Mimeo (November).Google Scholar
Issawi, C. (1988). The Fertile Crescent 1800–1914: A Documentary Economic History. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jacks, D. S. (2006). What drove 19th century commodity market integration? Explorations in Economic History 43, 3, pp. 383–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacks, D. S., Meissner, C. M. and Novy, D. (2008). Trade costs, 1870–2000. American Economic Review 98, 2 (May), pp. 529–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacks, D. S. and Pendakur, K. (2007). Global trade and the maritime transport revolution. Presented at the New Comparative Economic History: A Conference in Honor of Peter Lindert, University of California, Davis (June 1–3).Google Scholar
Jacoby, H. G. and Skoufias, E. (1997). Risk, financial markets, and human capital in a developing country. Review of Economic Studies 64 (July), pp. 311–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, R. (2000). Agricultural volatility and investments in children. American Economic Review 90 (May), pp. 399–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, W. and Shiue, C. H. (2007). Tariffs, trains, and trade: the role of institutions versus technology in the expansion of markets. University of Colorado, unpublished, (October).Google Scholar
Koren, M. and Tenreyro, S. (2007). Volatility and development. Quarterly Journal of Economics 122, 1, pp. 243–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korthals, W. L. (1994). Changing Economy in Indonesia, vol. 15: Prices (non-rice) 1814–1940. The Hague: Royal Tropical Institute.Google Scholar
Kose, M. A. and Reizman, R. (2001). Trade shocks and macroeconomic fluctuations in Africa. Journal of Development Economics 65, 1, pp. 55–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lains, P. (1995). A economia portuguesa no seculo XIX. Lisbon: Imprensa Nacional Casa da Moeda.Google Scholar
Landes, D. (1998). The Wealth and Poverty of Nations: Why Some Are So Rich and Some So Poor. London: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Lewis, W. A. (1969). Aspects of Tropical Trade, 1883–1965:The Wicksell Lectures. Stockholm: Almqvist and Wiksell.Google Scholar
Lewis, W. A. (1978a). The Evolution of the International Economic Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, W. A. (1978b). Growth and Fluctuations, 1870–1913. Boston: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Loayza, N. V., Rancière, R., Servén, L. and Ventura, J. (2007). Macroeconomic volatility and welfare in developing countries: an introduction. World Bank Economic Review 21, 3, pp. 343–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddison, A. (1995). Monitoring the World Economy 1820–1992. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Mauro, P., Sussman, N. and Yafeh, Y. (2006). Emerging Markets, Sovereign Debt, and International Financial Integration: 1870–1913 and Today. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Meissner, C. (2005). A new world order: explaining the emergence of the classical gold standard. Journal of International Economics 66, pp. 385–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendoza, E. (1997). Terms of trade uncertainty and economic growth. Journal of Development Economics 54, pp. 323–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, B. R. (1962). Abstract of British Historical Statistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, B. R. (1992). International Historical Statistics, Europe, 1750–1988. New York: Stockton Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, B. R. (1993). International Historical Statistics: The Americas, 1750–1988. New York: Stockton Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, B. R. (1998). International Historical Statistics: Africa, Asia & Oceania, 1750–1993. New York: Stockton Press.Google Scholar
Mitchener, K. J. and Weidenmier, M. (2007). Trade and empire. Unpublished (August).Google Scholar
Miyamoto, M., Sakudo, Y. and Yasuba, Y. (1965). Economic development in preindustrial Japan, 1859–1894. Journal of Economic History 25, 4, pp. 541–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulhall, M. G. (1892). The Dictionary of Statistics. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Newland, C. (1998). Exports and terms of trade in Argentina, 1811–1870. Bulletin in Latin American Research, 17, 3, pp. 409–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, D. and Weingast, B. (1989). Constitutions and commitment: the evolution of institutions governing public choice in 17th century England. Journal of Economic History (December), pp. 803–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obstfeld, M. and Taylor, A. M. (2004). Global Capital Markets: Integration, Crisis, and Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Rourke, K. H. and Williamson, J. G. (1999). Globalization and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pamuk, Ş. and Williamson, J. G. (2008). Globalization and de-industrialization in the Ottoman Empire 1790–1913 (ongoing).Google Scholar
Poelhekke, S. and Van Der Ploeg, F. (2007). Volatility, financial development and the natural resource curse. CEPR Discussion Paper 6513, Centre for Economic Policy Research, London (October).Google Scholar
Pollard, S. (1981). Peaceful Conquest: the Industrialization of Europe, 1760–1860. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Prados de la Escosura, L. (2003). El progresso económico de España. Bilbao: Fundación BBVA.Google Scholar
Prados de la Escosura, L. (2006). The economic consequences of independence in Latin America. In Bulmer-Thomas, V., Coatsworth, J. H. and Cortés Conde, R. (eds.), The Cambridge Economic History of Latin America, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Prados de la Escosura, L. (no date). Terms of trade and backwardness: testing the Prebisch doctrine for Spain and Britain during industrialization. Unpublished paper (sent to the author in 2005).Google Scholar
Prebisch, R. (1950). The Economic Development of Latin America and Its Principal Problems. Lake Success, NY: United Nations, Department of Economic Affairs. Reprinted in Economic Bulletin for Latin America 7 (1962), pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
Ramey, G. and Ramey, V. A. (1995). Cross-country evidence on the link between volatility and growth. American Economic Review 85, 5, pp. 1138–51.Google Scholar
Ravn, M. O. and Uhlig, H. (2002). On adjusting the Hodrick-Prescott filter for the frequency of observations. Review of Economics and Statistics (May), pp. 371–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenzweig, M. R. and Wolpin, K. I. (1993). Credit market constraints, consumption smoothing, and the accumulation of durable production assets in low income countries: investments in bullocks in India. Journal of Political Economy 101, 2, pp. 223–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, T. (2000). The Economic History of India 1857–1947. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Roy, T. (2002). Economic history and modern India: redefining the link. Journal of Economic Perspectives 16 (Summer), pp. 109–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sachs, J. D. (2001). Tropical underdevelopment. NBER Working Paper 8119, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saito, T. and Kiong, L. K. (1999). Statistics on the Burmese Economy. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Sauerbeck, A. (1886). Prices of commodities and precious metals. Journal of the Statistical Society of London 49 (3) (September), appendix C.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauerbeck, A. (1893). Prices of commodities during the last seven years. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 56 (2) (June).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauerbeck, A. (1909). Prices of commodities in 1908. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 72 (1) (March).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauerbeck, A. (1917). Wholesale prices of commodities in 1916. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 80 (2).Google Scholar
Sauerbeck, A. (1930). Wholesale prices of commodities in 1929. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 93 (2).Google Scholar
Sauerbeck, A. (1951). Wholesale prices in 1950. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 114 (3).Google Scholar
Seyf, A. (1984). Commercialization of agriculture: production and trade of opium in Persia, 1850–1906. International Journal of Middle East Studies 16 (May), pp. 233–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shah Mohammed, S. and Williamson, J. G. (2004). Freight rates and productivity gains in British tramp shipping 1869–1950. Explorations in Economic History 41 (April), pp. 172–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, H. W. (1950). The distribution of gains between investing and borrowing countries. American Economic Review 40 (1950), pp. 473–85.Google Scholar
Sundhaussen, H. (1989). Historische Statistik Serbiens, 1834–1914: mit Europaischen Vergleichsdaten. Munich: R. Oldenbourg.Google Scholar
Thomas, D., Beegle, K., Frankenberg, E., Sikoki, B., Strauss, J. and Teruel, G. (2004). Education in a crisis. Journal of Development Economics 74 (June), pp. 53–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tignor, R. L. (2006). W. Arthur Lewis and the Birth of Development Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, J. G. (2005). Globalization and the Poor Periphery before 1950. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, J. G. (2006a). Explaining world tariffs 1870–1938: Stolper-Samuelson, strategic tariffs and state revenues. In Findlay, R., Henriksson, R., Lindgren, H. and Lundahl, M. (eds.), Eli F. Heckscher, International Trade, and Economic History. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, J. G. (2006b). Globalization, de-industrialization and underdevelopment in the third world before the modern era. Journal of Iberian and Latin American History (Revista de Historia Económica) 24, 1 (Spring), pp. 9–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, J. G. (2007). Lost decades: dealing with independence and globalization in 19th century Latin America. Inaugural Lecture, Third International Congress in Economic History, Cuernavaca, Mexico (October 29–31).Google Scholar
Williamson, J. G. and Yousef, T. (2008). Globalization, policy and competitiveness: de-industrialization in Egypt 1790–1913 (ongoing).Google Scholar
Yamazawa, I. and Yamamoto, Y. (1979). Foreign Trade and Balance of Payments, Volume 14 of Estimates of Long-Term Economic Statistics of Japan Since 1868. Tokyo: Toyo Keizai Shinposha.Google Scholar
Yasuba, Y. (1996). Did Japan ever suffer from a shortage of natural resources before World War II? Journal of Economic History 56, 3, pp. 543–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar