Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-2h6rp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-01T16:03:42.691Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

W01.01 - Publication trends in high impact factor journals 1994-2004

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

B. Schrank
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Medical University and General Hospital, Vienna, Austria
M. Amering
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Medical University and General Hospital, Vienna, Austria

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Aims:

To describe the characteristics of psychiatric research and their changes within one decade by analysing the publications in three high impact general psychiatric journals.

Methods:

All articles published in the “American Journal of Psychiatry“, “British Journal of Psychiatry” and “Archives of General Psychiatry” in 1994 and 2004 were considered for analysis. The publications were classified as “research” or “non-research” articles and further categorised according to a range of variables including “methodology”, “research area”, “subject matter”; “number of participants” and “statement on funding”. Data were analysed descriptively.

Results:

In 2004 the overall percentage of non-research articles was 6,8% higher than in 1994. The use of different research methods remained fairly stable, with the exception of case-control studies, which accounted for a slightly higher percentage of all publications in 2004 compared to 1994. Further relevant developments included the tremendous increase in published studies involving neuro imaging techniques from 1994 to 2004. An increase in publications was also found for genetic and cross-cultural studies, while the number publications in most other research areas remained relatively stable. Moreover, the percentage of papers reporting funding also increased significantly from 1994 to 2004.

Conclusions:

The systematic analysis of journal content can be used to assess the state of psychiatric knowledge and practice. Highlighting advancements and changes over time it may reflect research trends and policies.

Type
Workshop: Scientific reading and writing in psychiatry
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2008
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.