Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T12:29:41.598Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Using causal interventionist models to examine the relationship between social anxiety and paranoia: A 3-month follow-up cross-cultural survey conducted in thailand and the united kingdom

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 August 2021

W. Aunjitsakul*
Affiliation:
Institute Of Health And Well-being, Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences College, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
H. Mcleod
Affiliation:
Institute Of Health And Well-being, Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences College, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
A. Gumley
Affiliation:
Institute Of Health And Well-being, Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences College, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

The continuum of social threat ranges from anxiety to paranoia. Examining the factors that predict and mediate the relationship between social anxiety and persecutory paranoia will help with the development of interventionist-causal theories that can guide the development of new treatments.

Objectives

To investigate mediators between social anxiety and persecutory paranoia in a prospective cross-cultural analogue sample.

Methods

A 3-month follow-up online survey included participants aged ≥18-years-old in Thailand and the UK. Recruitment was via advertisements on websites and social media. Participants completed questionnaires at baseline (T1) and 3-month follow-up (T2) measuring social anxiety, paranoia, depression. Mediators were: stigma; internal and external shame; social rank; self-esteem; and safety behaviours. We used linear regression to examine predictors of paranoia and mediation analysis to test indirect effects. Estimating the indirect effects was calculated by 10,000 bootstrapping bias-corrected 95% confidence intervals.

Results

At follow-up, 186 (70.4%female; mean age 34.9±9.1) Thai and 236 (81.4%female; 35.7±12.7) UK respondents completed the survey. Regarding change scores (T2-T1), higher paranoia was significantly predicted by higher social anxiety and external shame controlling for age, gender, depression. A simple mediation model controlling for depression showed significant indirect effects for external shame (ab=0.06, 95%CI=0.018 to 0.105) and safety behaviours (ab=0.06, 95%CI=0.002 to 0.127). A multiple mediation model found external shame was a significant mediator (ab=0.06, 95%CI=0.020 to 0.110).

Conclusions

These cross-cultural data suggest that external shame may mediate the prospective relationship between social anxiety and paranoia. These data suggest the potential for treatment of persecutory fears and social anxiety in psychosis by targeting shame-related cognitions.

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.