Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T07:39:22.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) of the prefrontal cortex in therapy-resistant depression: A double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

U. Palm
Affiliation:
Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilian-University, Munich, Germany
C. Schiller
Affiliation:
Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilian-University, Munich, Germany
Z. Fintescu
Affiliation:
Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilian-University, Munich, Germany
M. Obermeier
Affiliation:
Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilian-University, Munich, Germany
D. Keeser
Affiliation:
Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilian-University, Munich, Germany
E. Reisinger
Affiliation:
Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilian-University, Munich, Germany
O. Pogarell
Affiliation:
Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilian-University, Munich, Germany
M. Nitsche
Affiliation:
Neurophysiology, Georg-August-University, Gôttingen, Germany
H.-J. Möller
Affiliation:
Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilian-University, Munich, Germany
F. Padberg
Affiliation:
Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilian-University, Munich, Germany

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Background

TDCS for modulating neurophysiology is known since the 1960s. tDCS trials in patients with depression showed promising results.

Methods

22 patients with therapy resistant major depression (DSM-IV criteria) were included in a four week cross-over trial, 10 received 1 mA tDCS, 12 received 2 mA tDCS, 2 dropped out. Patients received add-on tDCS under a stable antidepressant treatment over 3 weeks and were randomized to active or sham tDCS treatment. The sham condition was evaluated in 10 healthy volunteers and was indistinguishable.Both, active (1 mA resp. 2 mA) and placebo tDCS were applied for 20 min per day and for two weeks and then switched to the other condition. The anode was positioned over F3 and the cathode over the contralateral supraorbital region. For placebo tDCS a novel sham device (neuroConn, llmenau, Germany) was used which is indistinguishable for the applying person. Severity of depression was assessed by HAMD, BDI, CGI and CORE scales and raters were blind to treatment conditions.

Results

Mean HAMD decreased by 25% in the whole population after four weeks of tDCS. Active tDCS performed significantly better (p = 0.0492) than the control treatment. However this positive association was restricted to the first study phase as there was also a significant (p = 0.0271) influence of the study phase in the cross-over design and an almost significant (p = 0.0864) interaction between treatment and study phase.

Conclusion

Though active tDCS was not superior to sham treatment, we observed hangover effects in weeks 3 and 4 depending on the first condition.

Type
P02-555
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2011
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.