Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T10:38:08.201Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A study of the personality trait-focused digital mental health intervention

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2024

S. Jeong
Affiliation:
1Psychiatry, Seoul National University Hospital
H. Kim
Affiliation:
1Psychiatry, Seoul National University Hospital
S. K. Lho
Affiliation:
240FY inc
S. Mun
Affiliation:
240FY inc
I. Hwang
Affiliation:
240FY inc
S. Kim
Affiliation:
240FY inc
H. Lim
Affiliation:
240FY inc
H. Kim
Affiliation:
1Psychiatry, Seoul National University Hospital
W. Moon
Affiliation:
240FY inc
M.-S. Shin*
Affiliation:
1Psychiatry, Seoul National University Hospital 3Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea, Republic Of
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Mental healthcare services that address a variety of primary complaints which are highly related to maladaptive personality traits among the general population are important to prevent developing psychiatric disorders.

Objectives

This study aimed to examine the effectiveness of a digital mental health service (named “Mindling”) that focuses on maladaptive personality traits in the general population.

Methods

Participants were recruited through a South Korean community website and screened for adults between the ages of 18 and 60 in terms of personality traits such as perfectionism, low self-esteem, social isolation, or anxiety. Participants were allocated to four intervention programs (Riggy, Pleaser, Shelly, and Jumpy) based on their screening results and were randomly assigned to digital treatment and waitlist groups. Each intervention program was conducted online for 10 weeks. The primary outcomes were all measured by self-report questionnaires; in addition to stress levels, each program included measures of perfectionism (Riggy), low self-esteem (Pleaser), loneliness (Shelly), and anxiety (Jumpy). The secondary outcomes included self-efficacy, depression, and other psychological states. All participants completed pre-treatment (baseline), intervention (week 5), and post-treatment (week 10) assessments, and the treatment group completed a separate follow-up assessment (week 14).

Results

In the treatment group, 70.05% of the participants completed the full course of the digital intervention. The mean scores for each primary outcome measure and some secondary outcome measures were significantly different between baseline and post-treatment in the treatment group for the Total, Riggy, Pleaser, Shelly, and Jumpy programs, but these differences were not observed in the waitlist group. In addition, mean differences between the treatment and waitlist groups at post-treatment assessment were significant for all primary outcome measures and some secondary outcome measures. Specifically, the levels of stress (Total program), perfectionism (Riggy), loneliness (Shelly), and anxiety (Jumpy) were significantly lower in the treatment group, while self-esteem (Pleaser) was higher. In addition, the mean differences between post-treatment and follow-up assessment data were not statistically significant for all primary outcome measures and nearly all secondary outcome measures.

Conclusions

This study validated the effectiveness of the digital intervention program targeting maladaptive personality traits and suggested its sustainable effects.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.