Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T07:46:58.597Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Structural gender inequalities and symptoms of postpartum depression in 40 countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2022

P.A. Martinez Diaz*
Affiliation:
Université de Sherbrooke, Faculté De Médecine Et Des Sciences De La Santé, Longueuil, Canada Centre de recherche Charles-Le Moyne sur les innovations en santé, -, Longueuil, Canada
J. Nazif-Munoz
Affiliation:
Université de Sherbrooke, Faculté De Médecine Et Des Sciences De La Santé, Longueuil, Canada Centre de recherche Charles-Le Moyne sur les innovations en santé, -, Longueuil, Canada
I. Magaña
Affiliation:
Universidad de Santiago de Chile, Escuela De Psicología, Santiago, Chile
G. Rojas
Affiliation:
Hospital Clínico Universidad de Chile, Departamento De Psiquiatría Y Salud Mental, Santiago, Chile
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

The extent to which structural gender inequality contributes to macro-level differences in postpartum depression (PPD) remains largely unknown.

Objectives

To examine the association of structural gender inequalities with national-level prevalence estimates of PPD symptoms.

Methods

Meta-analytically derived national-level estimates for the prevalence of PPD symptoms – based on the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) – were combined with economic (e.g., income inequality), health (e.g., infant mortality rate), sociodemographic (e.g., urban population), and structural gender inequality variables (e.g., abortion policies) for 40 countries (276 primary studies). Data came from a prior meta-analysis on PPD prevalence and international agencies (e.g., UNICEF). Meta-regression techniques and traditional p-value based stepwise procedures, complemented with a Bayesian model averaging approach, were used for a robust selection of variables associated with national-level PPD symptom prevalence. Sensitivity analyses excluded primary studies with small sample sizes or countries lacking evidence for psychometric properties of the EPDS.

Results

Income inequality (β = 0.04, 95% CI = 0.02 to 0.07) and abortion policies (β = 0.02, 95% CI = 0.00 to 0.03) were the only variables included in the final, adjusted model, accounting for 60.7% of the variance in PPD symptoms across countries. Gradual liberalizations of abortion policies were associated with a 2% decrease in national-level PPD symptom prevalence. Results were robust to sensitivity analyses.

Conclusions

Structural gender inequalities might be social determinants of PPD, as the liberalization of abortion policies seem to impact women’s perinatal mental health on a population level. More research on structural gender inequality is needed to guide policy and practice.

Disclosure

No significant relationships.

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.