Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T03:06:07.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The role of augmentation treatment with second-generation antipsychotics in major depression disorder–current evidence in the literature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2020

F. Coutinho
Affiliation:
Centro Hospitalar de São João, Clinic of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Porto, Portugal
M. Marinho
Affiliation:
Centro Hospitalar de São João, Clinic of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Porto, Portugal
C. Hipólito-Reis
Affiliation:
Centro Hospitalar de São João, Clinic of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Porto, Portugal

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a chronic mental illness with a considerable lifetime prevalence in adult men and women. Only a third of MDD patients remit following adequate antidepressant treatment, while most suffer from significant core depressive or residual symptoms during their clinical course. Augmentation treatment with second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) has been one of the suggested approaches to overcome this shortage of efficacy of antidepressant therapy.

Objectives

To review the role of SGAs as an augmentation strategy to antidepressant therapy in MDD.

Methods

A search of the MEDLINE/Pubmed database was conducted for articles from 2010 to 2015, using the MeSH terms “antypsichotics”, “depression” and “treatment”.

Results

There is a general consensus in the literature that antidepressant augmentation treatment with SGAs is more effective than placebo in the management of patients with MDD who failed to respond adequately to antidepressant therapy alone. The majority of studies found no significant differences between the different studied drugs (namely, aripiprazole, quetiapine, olanzapine and risperidone). On the other hand, discontinuation rates due to adverse effects are also higher with SGAs versus placebo. However, it remains unclear if augmentation with SGAs is more effective than other therapeutic strategies, such as combination or switching to other antidepressant or augmentation with other psychotropics.

Conclusions

There is strong evidence that SGAs augmentation is an effective and generally safe therapeutic approach to patients with MDD who respond poorly to antidepressants. Nevertheless, more studies are needed to understand the efficacy of this treatment comparing other therapeutic approaches.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their declaration of competing interest.

Type
EW190
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2016
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.