Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T08:33:33.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Rethinking marital enmeshment: distinguishing intrusiveness from closeness-caregiving among French couples

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

L Fanjoux-Cohen ,
A Mouly-Bandini ,
PD Werner  and
R-J Green
L Fanjoux-Cohen
Affiliation:
32 Boulevard Rodocunachi, 13008
A Mouly-Bandini
Affiliation:
MCU-PH, Service Pr Monties, Hôpital La Timone, Marseille, France
PD Werner*
Affiliation:
California School of Professional Psychology, 1005 Atlantic Avenue, Alameda, California94501, USA
R-J Green*
Affiliation:
California School of Professional Psychology, 1005 Atlantic Avenue, Alameda, California94501, USA
*
*Correspondence and reprints.
*Correspondence and reprints.
Get access

Summary

Authors recently have suggested that family enrneshment is not synonymous with high levels of closeness or cohesion. A model proposed by Green and Werner clarifies the cohesion-enmeshment domain by distinguishing between closeness-caregiving and intrusiveness as separate relationship processes. This paper examines the cross-cultural applicability of this perspective through a study of 61 married couples in France. The French version of the California Inventory for Family Assessment (CIFA), a self-report measure designed to assess clinically relevant marital dimensions, was employed. In general, spouses' reports of their marital process demonstrated high internal consistency reliabilities. Factor analysis showed meaningful factor structures distinguishing closeness-caregiving and intrusiveness, as predicted, as well as openness of communication. Significant correlations were obtained between CIFA scales and scores on the Marital Adjustment Test. These results are similar for French and American couples. Research implications for studying relationships among French-speaking couples are underlined.

Keywords

family assessmentself-report questionnairefamily structure
Type
Original article
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , 1998 , pp. 46 - 51
Copyright
Copyright © Elsevier, Paris 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bowen, MFamily Therapy in clinical practice New York: Jason Aronson, 1978Google Scholar
Browne, TLDyadic relations and symptom severity among Vietnam combat veterans and their female partners Unpublished doctoral dissertation Alameda: California School of Professional Psychology, 1995Google Scholar
Green, RG, Harris, RN, Forte, JA, Robinson, M. Evaluating FACES III and the circumplex model: 2,440 families Fam Process 1991; 30: 55–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, R-JAn overview of major contributions to family therapyGreen, R-J, Framo, JLFamily therapy: major contributions New York: International Universities Press, 1981 1–35Google Scholar
Green, R-J, Werner, PD. Intrusiveness and closeness-caregiving: Rethinking the concept of family “enmeshment.” Fam Process 1996; 35: 115–136CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewinsohn, MAModernization and marital relations in Taiwan Chinese individuals: A comparison of native Taiwan Chinese and Taiwan Chinese in America Unpublished doctoral dissertation Alameda: California School of Professional Psychology, 1993Google Scholar
Lewinsohn, MA, Werner, PD. Factors in Chinese marital process: Relationship to marital adjustment Fam Process 1997; 36: 43–61CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Locke, HJ, Wallace, KM. Short marital adjustment and prediction tests: their reliability and validity Marital Fam Living 1959; 21: 251–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minuchin, SFamilies and Family Therapy Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1974Google Scholar
O–Connor, MPerceived quality of relationship to mother, selfconcept, and resiliency to alcoholism of adult daughter of alcoholic fathers 1992 California School of Professional Psychology Unpublished doctoral dissertation AlamedaGoogle Scholar
Olson, DH, Russel, CS, Sprenkle, DH. Circumplex model of marital and family systems: theoretical update Fam Process 1983; 22: 69–83CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Werner, PD, Green, R-JA new measure of marital and family functioning Presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association San Francisco, CA 1991Google Scholar
Werner, PD, Green, R-JPreliminary manual: California Inventory for Family Assessment—Research edition Alameda: California School of Professional Psychology, 1993Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.