Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T08:39:32.684Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The results of Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in patients under forensic observation of their mental states in violent and non-violent subgroups

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2024

N. Kőszegi*
Affiliation:
1Department of Paediatrics
A. Lisincki
Affiliation:
2Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
B. Baran
Affiliation:
2Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
É. Jekkel
Affiliation:
2Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Previous studies showed, that reduced executive function can be associated with antisocial and aggressive behavior. For the measurement of executive functions numerous standardized neuropsychological tests are available.

Objectives

We thought to compare the results of an executive function examination with Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) of patients observed at the Semmelweis University’s Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy to normative data from published database. We also performed a subgroup analysis between the violent and non-violent groups of the patients.

Methods

After data clearance our dataset consisted of 20 patients, who were divided into two groups based on whether the crime they committed before their admission was violent according to the Cornell scale.The analyzed parameters were the number of perseverative errors, the percentage of perseverative errors, and the number of completed categories. For comparison, the data bank from the 1993 edition of the WCST manual as normative data was used. The deviation from the healthy average for all three parameters was compared between the violent and non-violent groups using a two-sample T-test.

Results

There was significant difference between the patient and normal populations in all the 3 analyzed WCST parameters: the mean difference was 9,37+2,764, (p=0,0008) in the number of perseverative errors, 14,04+2,21 (p<0,0001) in the percentage of perseverative errors and -2,39+0,34 (p<0,0001) in the number of completed categories (Table 1).Table 1:

The difference between the average scores of healthy individuals grouped by age (from the 1993 WCST manual) and the scores of the patients.

Observed parameterAverage difference(Patient-normal)SDConfidence interval (95%)P value
number of completed categories-2,390,343-3,064 ─ 1,716<0,0001
number of perseverative errors9,372,7643,936 ─ 14,8040,0008
percentage of perseverative errors14,042,2129,692─18,388<0,0001

On the other hand, there were no significant differences between the violent and non-violent subgroups in the average deviations (from the normative data) of the number of perseverative errors, the percentage of perseverative errors and the number of completed categories (with p-values of 0.092, 0.34 and 0.59, respectively).

Conclusions

As a limitation, it is important to note that due to the low sample size, and our sample’s heterogeneity in terms of psychiatric diagnosis, drawing reliable conclusions is not possible. However, our results were in line with previous similar research in the forensic psychiatric population (though not under forensic mental state observation) regarding the significant deviations in two examined WCST parameters when compared to normative data. Additionally our study did not find significant difference between the violent and non-violent subgroups of the patients.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.