Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T14:43:12.785Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Reducing psychiatric discharges to homelessness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

C. Forchuk
Affiliation:
Research/School of Nursing, Lawson Health Research Institute/University of Western Ontario, London
R. Vann
Affiliation:
Regional Mental Health Care, London, Canada
E. Wilura
Affiliation:
Canadian Mental Health Association, London, Canada
J. Hoch
Affiliation:
Centre for Research on Inner City Health, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada
M. Jeng
Affiliation:
City of London, London, Canada
S. Kingston-MacClure
Affiliation:
London Health Sciences Centre, London, Canada
E. Jensen
Affiliation:
School of Nursing, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In London, Ontario, discharges from psychiatric wards to shelters or NFA occurred 194 times per year. This discovery led to the creation of a pilot project that provided immediate access to a housing advocate and changed normal policies related to housing and start-up fees for a select group of income support recipients. The intervention was successful; seven participants who received this additional assistance were still housed six months later, whereas 6 of 7 who received usual care were still homeless. The goal of the current study was to determine the strengths and areas for improvement of a method to prevent discharge from hospital to NFA and suggest improvements in preparation for wider implementation.

Phase 2: intervention to all acute psychiatric patients within a general hospital.

Phase 3: intervention to all patients within a specialized tertiary care psychiatric hospital. Intervention included on-ward access to a housing advocate and income support staff which was facilitated through computer linkages to housing and income databases.

Findings revealed the success of the intervention across both acute and tertiary sites. All hypotheses were supported: the rate of discharge to homelessness decreased; those accessing the service were poor; and the cost savings from the program exceeded the cost of implementation. Advantages of the approach included: accessibility and convenience of services on site, positive influence on overall treatment plan and feelings of independence and support. Results reveal the positive influence a cross-sectoral approach has on preventing discharge from psychiatric wards to the streets and shelters.

Type
P03-547
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2011
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.