Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T04:14:16.242Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Quality Improvement Programme on Implementing Co-Production in Care Programme Approach in an In-Patient Rehabilitation Psychiatric Unit to Enhance Patient Engagement and Positive Step-Down Discharges

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2024

H. Tahseen*
Affiliation:
1Adult Psychiatry, Cygnet Healthcare, Mold 2School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
A. Hassoulas
Affiliation:
2School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
K. Umla-Runge
Affiliation:
2School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

This quality improvement (QI) programme was proposed to integrate co-production principles into rehabilitation psychiatry, focusing on enhancing patient-centred care and promoting positive step-down discharges within the mental health system. The backdrop of the QI programme was the essential role of rehabilitation psychiatry in aiding the recovery and reintegration of individuals with mental health challenges, and sub-optimal audit results about patient’s attendance and positive step-down discharges at an in-patient psychiatric unit.

Objectives

The QI programme aimed to implement and explore Co-production, a transformative approach involving patients and healthcare professionals as equal partners.

  • - To promote co-production in psychiatric in-patient service

  • - To improve patient experience in the CPA meetings

  • - To reduce anxiety associated with the CPA meetings and discharge planning

  • - To assess staff’s limitations and barriers in promoting co-production.

Methods

The QI programme was divided into phases, including diagnostic, problem-solving, and evaluation. It employed diagnostic tools such as the fishbone cause and effect diagram and the 5-Why Technique for root cause analysis. The project’s aim was aligned with the Model of Improvement, guided by the three fundamental questions. Change ideas were developed using driver’s diagram and were then evaluated through PDSA cycles. Quantitative analysis utilized paired t-tests to assess the significance of changes, and qualitative analysis focused on patient perspectives gathered through the co-produced CPA questionnaire. Emerging themes from the questionnaire responses were integrated into the project’s trajectory through narrative synthesis. Predictions were formulated to measure project success: 50% patient attendance in the next CPA meetings, 70% positive step-down discharges, and improved Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) scores.

Results

The iterative Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycles demonstrated the evolving impact of interventions on patient engagement and discharge outcomes. Implementation of patient information leaflets, staff training, and a CPA agenda template led to increased attendance and positive step-down discharges. Analysis of HAM-A scores revealed a substantial decline in anxiety levels for almost all participants, suggesting the effectiveness of the interventions. Discharge outcomes were influenced by patient engagement and tailored interventions. Patient responses revealed themes such as challenges during transitions to community care, empowerment from shared decision-making, and diverse experiences in communication with healthcare professionals.

Conclusions

The CPA agenda template improved patient experiences by enhancing communication and patient-centeredness.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.