Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T18:51:17.115Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

PW01-55 - Stress And Burnout In Train Engine Drivers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2020

K. Garber
Affiliation:
Faculty of Education, Free University Bolzano, Brixen, Italy Institut für Verhaltensmedizin und Prävention, UMIT - The Private University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Innsbruck, Austria
K. Kuntner
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychology, Leopold-Franzens-University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
S. Giacomuzzi
Affiliation:
Institut für Verhaltensmedizin und Prävention, UMIT - The Private University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall in Tirol, Innsbruck, Austria Institute of Psychology, Leopold-Franzens-University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria Department for Psychiatry und Psychotherapy, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objectives

The job of an engine driver appeared ideal for research studies because of its extremely high responsibility coupled with a high level of permanent concentration.

Methods

The main elements of the study focused on applying the EQ-5D (Quality of Life Questionnaire), SVF 78 (Stress Processing Questionnaire) and FBL-R (Freiburg Complaint List; revised version).

Results

It turned out hat exactly fifty percent of all train drivers regret having chosen their job and judged their professional strain very high (p< 0.001). The SVF 78 reveals the following: persons of the First Group achieved much higher values in the scales regarding “escape” (p=0.029), “mental preoccupation after work” (p=0.003), “resignation” (p=0,011) and in the total amount of negative strategies (p=0.004), while Group 2 presents only higher values in the scale concerning the “playing down” (p=0.039) effect.

There were also a wide-ranging differences between the two groups, especially in the scales about “general state of health” (p< 0.001), “cardiovascular complaints” (p< 0.001), “pain” (p< 0.001), “sensory perception” (p< 0.001), “emotional reactivity” (p=0.001) and “total sum of complaints” (p< 0.001). The EQ-5D showed that train drivers who are content about the choice of their job judge their quality of life much higher than those regretting their choice (p< 0.001).

Conclusions

The results make clear that the dissatisfaction about the chosen job has negative effects on both the physical and psychological well-being.

Type
Others
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2009
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.