Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T07:25:19.412Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

PW01-40 - Reward Learning and Processing In Euthymic Bipolar Patients: Insights From Behavioural and Neuroimaging Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 April 2020

M. Wessa
Affiliation:
Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, Central Institute of Mental Health, Mannheim, Germany
A.V. King
Affiliation:
Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, Central Institute of Mental Health, Mannheim, Germany
A. Bongers
Affiliation:
Mediri GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany
M.G. Hennerici
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
A. Gass
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany Neurology/Neuroradiology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
J. Linke
Affiliation:
Institute of Cognitive and Clinical Neuroscience, Central Institute of Mental Health, Mannheim, Germany

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Dysregulation of motivation and altered processing of reward represent important diagnostic criteria of bipolar disorder and have been proposed as a trait marker of the disorder. Until now, only few studies investigated the processing of reward and learning through reward and punishment in euthymic bipolar patients (BP).

Objectives/aims

Two studies were conducted to investigate mechanisms of reward learning and processing in euthymic BP and healthy individuals (HC).

Methods

In the first study, 23 euthymic BP, 15 remitted patients with Major depression (MD) and 16 HC participated in an associative learning task, assessing the efficiency of contingency learning as well as the preference to learn through positive or negative feedback. In the second study, a probabilistic reversal learning task was conducted during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Here, the neural correlates of reward and punishment were assessed in 22 euthymic BP and 21 HC.

Results

We observed no group differences for the efficiency of contingency learning. However, euthymic BP with a manic episode prior to remission learned better from positive feedback whereas euthymic BP with a depressed episode prior to remission and remitted MD patients learned better from negative feedback. HC did not show such preferences in learning. In addition, bipolar patients exhibited increased orbitofrontal and parahippocampal activity in response to reward but no differences in response to punishment.

Conclusions

Interestingly, the last episode seems to differentially affect emotional and learning processes during euthymia. On a neural level, euthymic BP seem to be more sensitive to reward than healthy individuals.

Type
Affective disorders / Unipolar depression / Bipolar disorder
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2010
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.