Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-8bljj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T23:54:18.800Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Psychophatology Differences Between Pregnant Women who Conceived Naturally and Through Assisted Reproduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

M.I. Ramos-Fuentes
Affiliation:
Terapeutica Medico Quirurgica, Area de Psiquiatria, Fac. Medicina, Universidad de Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain
M.J. Cardoso-Moreno
Affiliation:
Terapeutica Medico Quirurgica, Area de Psiquiatria, Fac. Medicina, Universidad de Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain
F.J. Vaz-Leal
Affiliation:
Terapeutica Medico Quirurgica, Area de Psiquiatria, Fac. Medicina, Universidad de Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain
N. Fernandez-Sanchez
Affiliation:
Terapeutica Medico Quirurgica, Area de Psiquiatria, Fac. Medicina, Universidad de Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain
L. Rodriguez-Santos
Affiliation:
Terapeutica Medico Quirurgica, Area de Psiquiatria, Fac. Medicina, Universidad de Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain
A. Bejar
Affiliation:
Terapeutica Medico Quirurgica, Area de Psiquiatria, Fac. Medicina, Universidad de Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain
N. Berjano
Affiliation:
Terapeutica Medico Quirurgica, Area de Psiquiatria, Fac. Medicina, Universidad de Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain
J.A. Dominguez
Affiliation:
Terapeutica Medico Quirurgica, Area de Psiquiatria, Fac. Medicina, Universidad de Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain
E. González
Affiliation:
Terapeutica Medico Quirurgica, Area de Psiquiatria, Fac. Medicina, Universidad de Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective:

In the past few decades, new and more efficient techniques to help solve fertility problems have become widely available throughout the developed world. The aim of this study was to determine whether there were differences on psychopathology factors between women who had conceived after in vitro fertilization (IVF) and women who had conceived naturally.

Methods:

The sample was composed of 41 pregnant women of whom 28 women had conceived through assisted reproductive technology (IVF) and 13 had conceived naturally. Women were evaluated by week 20 of pregnancy at the Infanta Cristina University Hospital Obstetrics and Gynecology Service, in Badajoz. Women consented to complete the Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90-R).

Results:

IVF women were characterized by higher scores on Anxiety Scale (t = 3.90; p = 0.045) and lower scores on Hostility Scale (t = 4.35; p = 0.041) than women who had conceived naturally. There were no differences in the others scales.

Conclusions:

IVF women appear to present a temperamental profile characterized by a tendency to anxiety. Further research is needed to firstly, confirm these preliminary findings, and secondly, to longitudinally explore its impact on pregnancy outcome and mother-infant attachment.

Type
P01-135
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association 2009
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.