Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T03:34:52.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Psychometric properties of the French version of the Composite Scale of Morningness in adults

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2020

H. Caci ,
L. Nadalet ,
P. Staccini ,
M. Myquel  and
P. Boyer
H. Caci
Affiliation:
Service Universitaire de Psychiatrie de l'Enfant et de l'Adolescent, Fondation Lenval, 57, avenue de la Californie, 06200Nice
L. Nadalet
Affiliation:
Service Universitaire de Psychiatrie de l'Enfant et de l'Adolescent, Fondation Lenval, 57, avenue de la Californie, 06200Nice
P. Staccini
Affiliation:
Service d'Information Médicale, Hôpital Saint-Roch, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice, 5, rue Pierre-Devoluy, 06000Nice
M. Myquel
Affiliation:
Service Universitaire de Psychiatrie de l'Enfant et de l'Adolescent, Fondation Lenval, 57, avenue de la Californie, 06200Nice
P. Boyer
Affiliation:
CNRS UMR 7593, Hôpital de la Salpêtrière, Pavillon de Clérambault, 47, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013Paris, France
Get access

Summary

The objective of this study was to provide a reliable instrument to measure morningness for upcoming studies in French samples, using the Composite Scale of Morningness (CSM), which has been translated into French. Nursing students (n = 356) completed the questionnaire between February and March 1997. The total score obtained was independent of age and gender, and normally distributed. The reliability was high (Cronbach's α = 0.85), and factorial analysis confirmed the unidimensionality of the scale. Evening-type subjects are thought to score under 31, and morning-type subjects are thought to score above 44. As an external validation, morningness was associated, on weekdays and weekends, with early rising times and bedtimes and early peak times of physical and mental performance. In conclusion, we found that the English and the French versions of the Composite Scale of Morningness gave identical results. The scale is reliable and can be used for French-speaking adult samples. Nevertheless, normative data and other external validity criteria are needed.

Keywords

chronobiologychronotypecircadian rhythmsmorningness–eveningnessquestionnairetranscultural validation
Type
Original article
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 14 , Issue 5 , September 1999 , pp. 284 - 290
Copyright
Copyright © 1999 Éditions scientifiques et médicales Elsevier SAS.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carskadon, MAVieira, CAcebo, C. Association between puberty and delayed phase preference. Sleep 1993; 16: 258–262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cortina, JM. What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. J. Appl Psychol 1993; 78: 98–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folkard, SMonk, TLobban, M. Towards a predictive test of adjustment to shift work. Ergonomics 1979; 22: 79–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Freeman, GLHovland, CI. Diurnal variations in performance and related physiological processes. Psychol Bull 1934; 31: 777–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwood, KM. Long-term stability and psychometric properties of the composite scale of morningness. Ergonomics 1994; 37: 377–383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horne, JAÖstberg, O. A self-assessment questionnaire to determine morningness–eveningness in human circadian rhythms. Int. J. Chronobiol. 1976; 4: 97–110.Google ScholarPubMed
Kerkhof, G. Inter-individual differences in the human circadian system: a review. Biol Psychol 1985; 20: 83–112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kerkhof, G. Individual differences in circadian rhythms.In: Folkard, SMonk, T eds. Hours of work: temporal factors in work scheduling. Chicester, England: Wiley; 1985.Google Scholar
Kleitman, N. Sleep and wakefulness Chigaco: University Press; 1939.Google Scholar
Moog, R. Morning–evening types and shifwork: a questionnaire study.In: Reinberg, AVieux, NAndlauer, P eds. Night and shift work: biological and social aspects. Oxford, England: Pergamon Press 1981.Google Scholar
Moret, LMesbah, MChwalow, JLellouch, J. Validation interne d'une échelle de mesure: relation entre analyse en composantes principales, coefficient alpha de Cronbach et coefficient de corrélation intra-classe. Rev Épidém Santé Pub 1993; 41: 179–186.Google Scholar
Nunnally, JC. Psychometric theory 2nd edition. New York: McGraw-Hill 1978.Google Scholar
Siegel, SCastellan, NJ. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences 2nd edtion. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1988.Google Scholar
Smith, CSReilly, CMidkiff, K. Evaluation of three circadian rhythm questionnaires with suggestions for an improved measure of morningness. J Appl Psychol 1989; 74: 728–738.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
StataCorp. Stata statistical software: release 5.0, College Station. Texas: Stata Press; 1997.Google Scholar
Torsvall, LAkerstedt, T. A diurnal type scale. Scand J Work Environm Health 1980; 6: 283–290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wuth, O. Klinik und Therapie der Schlafstorungen. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 1931; 61: 833–837.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.