Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T13:20:02.178Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Psychological interventions for adolescent psychosis: A pilot controlled trial in routine care

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2020

S. Browning ,
R. Corrigall ,
P. Garety ,
R. Emsley  and
S. Jolley
S. Browning
Affiliation:
Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services Clinical Academic Group, South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Mapother House, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AF, United Kingdom
R. Corrigall
Affiliation:
Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services Clinical Academic Group, South London & Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, Mapother House, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AF, United Kingdom
P. Garety
Affiliation:
King's College, PO77 Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, 16, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AF, United Kingdom
R. Emsley
Affiliation:
Centre for Biostatistics, Institute of Population Health, The University of Manchester, 4.304 Jean McFarlane Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom
S. Jolley*
Affiliation:
King's College, PO77 Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, 16, De Crespigny Park, Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AF, United Kingdom
*
*Corresponding author. Tel.: +20 7848 5028; fax: +20 7848 5006. E-mail address: [email protected] (S. Jolley).
Get access

Abstract

Purpose

Evidence for the recommendation to deliver Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) and Family Interventions (FI) to under-18s with psychosis derives from adult research, and no previous study has focused exclusively on an adolescent population. We evaluated adaptations of these therapies for adolescent inpatients with psychosis (CBTpA and FIpA), delivered as an adjunct to inpatient standard care (SC).

Subjects and methods

Thirty adolescent inpatients with psychotic symptoms on admission were sequentially allocated to receive CBTpA + SC (n = 10); FIpA + SC (n = 10) or SC alone (n = 10). Psychotic symptoms and functioning were measured at admission and discharge.

Results

Group comparisons did not reach conventional significance, but effect sizes in this pilot study showed a promising impact of CBTpA compared to SC alone, in reducing symptoms (ES: d = 0.6), with smaller effect sizes for functioning (d = 0.2) and for FIpA (symptoms, d = 0.1 and functioning, d = 0.4). There was no advantage of either additional treatment in reducing length of stay, but self-report satisfaction ratings were higher for both psychological therapies.

Discussion and conclusions

The study is the first to focus on an exclusively adolescent population, using appropriately adapted therapy protocols. Findings suggest that the interventions are feasible, acceptable and helpful for adolescents with psychosis. Larger randomised controlled trials are now needed.

Keywords

SchizophreniaCognitive Behavioural TherapyFamily InterventionInpatient
Type
Original article
Information
European Psychiatry , Volume 28 , Issue 7 , September 2013 , pp. 423 - 426
Copyright
Copyright © European Psychiatric Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bird, V, Premkumar, P, Kendall, T, Whittington, C, Mitchell, J, Kuipers, EEarly intervention services, cognitive-behavioural therapy and family intervention in early psychosis: systematic review Br J Psychiatry 2010;197:350–356CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dixon, LB, Dickerson, F, Bellack, AS, Bennett, M, Dickinson, D, Goldberg, RW, et al.Schizophrenia Patient Outcomes Research Team (PORT). The 2009 schizophrenia PORT psychosocial treatment recommendations and summary statements Schizophr Bull 2010;36:48–70CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fowler, DR, Garety, PA, Kuipers, ECognitive behaviour therapy for psychosis: theory and practice. Chichester: Wiley; 1995.Google Scholar
Glick, ID, Clarkin, JF, Haas, GL, Spencer, J.H. Jr.Clinical significance of inpatient family intervention: conclusions from a clinical trial Hosp Community Psychiatr 1993;44:869–873Google ScholarPubMed
Haddock, G, Lewis, S, Bentall, R, Dunn, G, Drake, R, Tarrier, NInfluence of age on outcome of psychological treatments in first episode psychosis Br J Psychiatry 2006;188:250–254CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuipers, E, Garety, PA, Fowler, D, Dunn, G, Bebbington, P, Freeman, D, et al.The London-East Anglia randomised controlled trial of cognitive-behaviour therapy for psychosis. I: effects of the treatment phase Br J Psychiatry 1997;171:319–327CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuipers, E, Leff, J, Lam, DFamily work for schizophrenia: a practical guide. London: Gaskell Press; 2002.Google Scholar
Newton, E, Larkin, M, Melhuish, R, Wykes, TMore than just a place to talk: young people's experiences of group psychological therapy as an early intervention for auditory hallucinations Psychol Psychother 2007;80:127–149CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Newton, E, Landau, S, Smith, P, Monks, P, Shergill, S, Wykes, TEarly psychological intervention for auditory hallucinations: an exploratory study of young people's voices groups J Nerv Ment Dis 2005;193:58–61CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NICE. Schizophrenia core interventions in the treatment and management of schizophrenia in primary and secondary care (update & review). London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2009/2011.Google Scholar
NICE. Psychosis and schizophrenia in children and young people: full guideline. Draft for consultation. Downloaded 28/10/12. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/index.jsp?action=download&o=60475.Google Scholar
Overall, J, Gorham, EThe Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale Psychol Rep 1962;10:799–812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffer, D, Gould, MS, Brasic, J, Ambrosini, P, Fisher, P, Bird, H, et al.A children's global assessment scale (CGAS) Arch Gen Psychiatry 1983;40:1228–1231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SPSS Version 20. 2011. IBM SPSS Statistics.Google Scholar
Steinhausen, HGlobal assessment of child psychopathology J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1987;26:203–206CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Health Organization. The ICD–10 classification of mental and behavioural disorders: clinical description and diagnostic guidelines. Geneva: WHO; 1992.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.