Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T10:01:58.465Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Psychiatry Trainees’ Perspectives on Psychotherapy Training in Residencies Worldwide

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 August 2024

R. M. Salgado*
Affiliation:
1Centro Hospitalar do Tâmega e Sousa, Penafiel 2Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
O. von Doellinger
Affiliation:
1Centro Hospitalar do Tâmega e Sousa, Penafiel
*
*Corresponding author.

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction

Incorporating psychotherapy into the curricula of psychiatry residency programs has been proven difficult, even in countries where psychotherapy training is a requirement for psychiatry residents to become psychiatrists. There is a risk that future psychiatrists lacking psychotherapy skills will be restricted in managing the wide scope of disorders and personalities they will face in clinical practice. It is important to assess what psychiatry trainees around the globe have to say about psychotherapy training as part of their residency curricula.

Objectives

The primary purpose of the article was to assess psychiatry trainees’ perspectives on psychotherapy training in residency programs worldwide.

Methods

The authors performed a narrative review, resulting 19 original research studies, published between 2001 and 2021, evaluating psychiatry residents’ perspectives by the application of a questionnaire.

Results

Nineteen articles were included in this review. Most of the studies were developed across European countries (47.4%) and in the USA (36.8%). Psychiatry residents are interested in and value psychotherapy training, and some consider it should be an obligatory competency for psychiatrists, as it already occurs in some countries worldwide. Even though, most psychiatry trainees feel dissatisfaction with the existing training in residency curricula, pointing out concerns related to the quality of resources such as courses of psychotherapy and supervision of cases, time within the residency period, and financial constraints. In terms of personal psychotherapy, we found contrasting views of its importance in psychotherapy training for psychiatry residents. A crucial finding was that psychiatry residents tend to lose interest in psychotherapy during the years of the residency, and dissatisfaction with the quality of the psychotherapy curricula, lack of support, and low self-perceived competence in psychotherapy by trainees were factors associated with reduced interest in psychotherapy training.

Conclusions

At a time when psychotherapy is increasingly becoming acknowledged to play a central role in the treatment of most psychiatric disorders, current training is failing to provide these competencies to psychiatry trainees. Serious reflection must be given to both the extent of the guidelines and the practical opportunities for psychotherapy training so future psychiatrists can be qualified to provide an accurate biopsychosocial model of psychiatric care. The authors postulate that maintaining residents’ interest in psychotherapy requires improvements in the residency curricula and departmental leadership must support trainees’ goals of becoming comprehensively trained psychiatrists.

Disclosure of Interest

None Declared

Type
Abstract
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.