No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Psychiatric premises for abortion in Poland - ethical, legal and clinical issues
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 August 2024
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Introduction
After judgment of the Constitutional Tribunal of 22.10.2020, there are two premises for abortion: when pregnancy was caused by rape or pregnancy is the threat for health and life of a mother. Then some people indicated that the latter should be interpreted more broadly. So far, jurisprudence has interpreted health threats only in relation to physical health, currently – cases classified as mental health threats are included.
Objectives
The aim of this paper is first to analyze different aspects of this phenomenon: clinical, philosophical, including ethical and legal. The second goal is to point out the best actions for psychiatrists.
Methods
The methodology of this paper corresponds to the pastoral paradigm: diagnosis, reflection, action. At first, the arguments of opponents and proponents of the concept of psychiatric premises for abortion were extracted. Then they were assessed from a logical and essential point of view. Finally, some conclusions and guides were included to enable psychiatrists to act appropriately, including ethical, clinical and legal aspects.
Results
Statements and letters from various institutions and societies were analyzed, including the Presidium of the Supreme Medical Council, Polish Pediatrics Society, the Expert Team on Bioethics of the Polish Bishops’ Conference, the Bioethics Committee of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Patient’s Rights Ombudsman, Commissioner for Human Rights. The key arguments for psychiatric premises are presented in the Table 1.Table 1.
| Argument | Description |
| Etiological | the only cause of mental disorders during pregnancy is the pregnancy itself or fetal diseases |
| Therapeutical | abortion is a method of treating mental disorders during pregnancy |
| Prognostic | possible long- and short-term complications after the abortion procedure do not pose a significant threat to the woman’s life and health |
| Consultation-Liaison | the task of the consultant psychiatrist is to indicate what actions other doctors should take |
| Ethical | the value of the fetus’s life is negligible compared to values such as the mother’s mental state or well-being |
| Political | such conduct is beneficial to state policy and the good of society |
| Legal | such procedures are legal |
According to opponents, using the premise of mental health risks to terminate a pregnancy would be an example of the psychiatrization of life and the abuse of psychiatry for political purposes. There would be a danger of associating psychiatry as a tool for performing abortions, which would perpetuate the phenomenon of stigmatization – of both doctors and patients. Each of the arguments for this has been negated.
Conclusions
This problem illustrates an attempt to replace the paradigm of traditional personalistic ethics with utilitarianism. The concept of psychiatric premises for abortion is contrary to the principles of double effect and proportionality. It is also against the Polish Code of Medical Ethics: art. 39 and art. 54.
Disclosure of Interest
None Declared
- Type
- Abstract
- Information
- European Psychiatry , Volume 67 , Special Issue S1: Abstracts of the 32nd European Congress of Psychiatry , April 2024 , pp. S576 - S577
- Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of European Psychiatric Association
You have
Access
Open access
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.